Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1430930
This article is part of the Research Topic Marine Plankton: Biological and Chemical Interactions View all 4 articles

Nearshore Microbial Communities of the Pacific Northwest Coasts of Canada and the U.S. Authors

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • 2 Island Research, Greenbank WA, United States
  • 3 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Unidad de Genética, Madrid, Spain
  • 4 College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States
  • 5 Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Seattle, Washington, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    A survey of marine pelagic coastal microbial communities was conducted over a large geographic latitude range, from Cape Mendocino in northern California USA to Queen Charlotte Sound in British Columbia Canada, during the spring to summer transition. DNA metabarcoding and flow cytometry were used to characterize microbial communities. Physical and chemical oceanography indicated moderate conditions during the survey with no widespread upwelling, marine heat wave, or other extreme conditions. However, four locations displayed features approaching acidified conditions: Heceta Head, Newport, Copalis Beach, and Cape Flattery. Although bacterial and archaeal communities at the Juan de Fuca canyon and northward had high similarity, those south of the Juan de Fuca canyon were well differentiated from each other. In contrast, eukaryotic microbial communities exhibited stronger geographic differentiation than bacterial and archaeal communities across the extent of the survey. Seawater parameters that were best predictors of bacterial and archaeal community structure were temperature, pH, and dissolved inorganic nutrients (nitrate, phosphate, silicate), while those that were best predictors of eukaryotic microbial community structure were salinity, dissolved oxygen, total alkalinity, and dissolved inorganic nutrients (nitrite, silicate). Although five bacterial and archaeal indicators for potentially corrosive waters were identified (Colwellia, Nitrosopumilus, Nitrosopelagicus, Sup05 cluster, Sva0996 marine group), no eukaryotic microbial indicators were found. Potentially pathogenic taxa detected in the survey included four disease-causing bacteria for mammals, finfish, and/or shellfish (Coxiella, Flavobacterium, Francisella, Tenacibaculum), sixteen genera of microalgae capable of producing biotoxins, and fifteen parasitic species. This study demonstrates the value of coordinating microbial sampling and analysis with broad-scale oceanographic surveys to generate insights into community structures of these important pelagic trophic levels.

    Keywords: nearshore microbial communities, Bacteria and Archaea, eukaryotic phytoplankton, 16S and 18S rRNA metabarcoding, Northeastern Pacific Ocean

    Received: 11 Jun 2024; Accepted: 15 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Rhodes, Adams, Gallego Simon, Kavanaugh, Alin and Feely. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Linda D. Rhodes, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, WA 98112, Washington, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.