Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Conservation and Sustainability
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1427595

Intraspecific variation in resilience traits of eelgrass across intertidal stress gradients and oyster aquaculture methods

Provisionally accepted
Jennifer L. Ruesink Jennifer L. Ruesink 1*Katie Houle Katie Houle 2Kristy Kroeker Kristy Kroeker 3Brett R. Dumbauld Brett R. Dumbauld 4Fiona C. Boardman Fiona C. Boardman 1Nathaniel S. Lewis Nathaniel S. Lewis 5Brooke A. McIntyre Brooke A. McIntyre 6Andrew D. Suhrbier Andrew D. Suhrbier 2Bobbi Hudson Bobbi Hudson 2
  • 1 University of Washington, Seattle, United States
  • 2 Pacific Shellfish Institute, Olympia, Washington, United States
  • 3 University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States
  • 4 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, District of Columbia, United States
  • 5 Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States
  • 6 Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Species persist through resistance and recovery traits induced by natural stressors. Whether human activities exacerbate or moderate the effects of natural stressors is an open question. Because eelgrass (Zostera marina) creates coastal habitat, its response to natural stressors and human activities is of particular management importance. In this study, traits of intertidal eelgrass were examined across cumulative stressors of emersion and oyster culture, including two culture types: oysters grown directly on sediment (ground culture) or supported by gear above the sediment (off-bottom culture). Summer eelgrass was larger above-and below-ground and branched less than in spring, while density and cover were similar seasonally but declined at higher elevation and in ground culture. Eelgrass traits were divided into those related to resistance (larger above-ground size and below-ground storage) and recovery (increased flowering, branching, and rhizome extension). Resistance traits responded additively to intertidal elevation and oyster culture, with above-and below-ground size reduced in all conditions except that rhizome mass was maintained in ground culture. Smaller above-ground size may confer resistance to emersion stress, as a departure from expectations for other stressors. For resilience traits, flowering increased and internode length declined at higher elevation, whereas these traits did not change in ground culture, and off-bottom culture was associated with shorter internodes (additive cumulative stressor) and tended to moderate the enhanced flowering at higher elevations (non-additive, P=0.058). Transitory disturbance in ground culture may reduce eelgrass density with few effects on resilience, whereas offbottom culture involves longer-term gear placement and trait responses by eelgrass.

    Keywords: Zostera marina, stressors, disturbance, perturbation, Tidal elevation, eelgrass, Resistance, Recovery

    Received: 04 May 2024; Accepted: 07 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ruesink, Houle, Kroeker, Dumbauld, Boardman, Lewis, McIntyre, Suhrbier and Hudson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jennifer L. Ruesink, University of Washington, Seattle, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.