AUTHOR=Genin Amatzia , Rickel Svetlana , Zarubin Margarita , Kiflawi Moshe TITLE=Effects of flow speed and prey density on the rate and efficiency of prey capture in zooplanktivorous coral-reef fishes JOURNAL=Frontiers in Marine Science VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2024.1330477 DOI=10.3389/fmars.2024.1330477 ISSN=2296-7745 ABSTRACT=

Holling’s classical functional response model describes the mechanistic foundations of the relationships between predation rate and prey density. As such, the model is pertinent to predators that actively search for prey, but not to stationary predators in which additional factors, such as flow speed, determine the rates of prey encounter. The main objective of this study was to measure the rates and corresponding efficiencies of zooplanktivory among different common species of coral-reef fishes under a wide range of prey densities and current speeds. All our experiments were carried out in a flume with different combinations of flow speeds (3-28.5 cm/s) and prey densities (210 - 1050 prey m-3). Nauplii of Artemia salina were used as prey. Despite major differences in the taxonomic origin of the studied species, their morphologies, and the types of shelters they use, the foraging performances of the fish, their predation rates, and the way those rates were affected by prey density and flow speed were surprisingly similar. Under a fixed prey density, capture rates did not change much as function of flow speed. Under conditions of equal prey flux, predation rates were always higher under conditions of high density and weaker flow than under lower density and faster flow. A sharp decline in capture efficiency with increasing flow speed was explained by a corresponding narrowing of the fish’s body orientation relative to the flow. In other words, with increasing flow speed, the fish gradually became more-narrowly oriented head-on onto the flow, exhibiting a decrease in the frequency of body turns (“maneuverability”). These trends, especially the reduced maneuverability under strong currents, can explain our findings that predation rates did not increase when the flow, hence prey flux, increased. Inter-specific differences in predation rates and efficiencies, however small, agree well with observed differences in the type of habitats the different species occupy.