AUTHOR=Niu Fuqiang , Xie Jiarui , Zhang Xuexin , Xue Ruichao , Chen Benqing , Liu Zhenwen , Yang Yanming 

TITLE=Assessing differences in acoustic characteristics from impact and vibratory pile installation and their potential effects on the large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea)

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Marine Science

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1106980

DOI=10.3389/fmars.2023.1106980

ISSN=2296-7745

ABSTRACT=<p>Underwater noise from anthropogenic activities can have negative behavioral and physical effects on marine life, including physical changes, injuries, and death. Impact pile driving and vibratory pile driving are generally used for the construction of ocean-based foundations. Based on the field data under the same marine engineering and marine environment, this paper addresses the characteristics of underwater noise from impact and vibratory pile driving, their differences, and the effects of noise on populations of the large yellow croaker (<italic>Pseudosciaena crocea</italic>). The impact pile driving pulse had a median peak-to-peak sound pressure source level (SPL<sub>pp</sub>) of 244.7 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m and a median sound exposure source level (SEL<sub>ss</sub>) of 208.1 dB re 1 μPa<sup>2</sup>s at 1 m by linear regression. The waveform of vibratory pile driving appears to be continuous with a low SPL<sub>pp</sub>, but the cumulative SEL (SEL<sub>cum</sub>) in 1 min is very high, reaching 207.5 dB re 1 μPa<sup>2</sup>s at 1 m. The range of behavioral response for adult large yellow croaker (20–23 cm) is predicted to be 4,798 m for impact pile driving and 1,779 m for vibratory pile driving. The study provides evidence of the comparative potential effects of vibratory and impact pile driving on the large yellow croaker and reference for the conservation of croaker.</p>