AUTHOR=Guyondet Thomas , Filgueira Ramón , Pearce Christopher M. , Tremblay Réjean , Comeau Luc A. TITLE=Nutrient-Loading Mitigation by Shellfish Aquaculture in Semi-Enclosed Estuaries JOURNAL=Frontiers in Marine Science VOLUME=9 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.909926 DOI=10.3389/fmars.2022.909926 ISSN=2296-7745 ABSTRACT=

Bivalve aquaculture may provide a variety of ecosystem services including nitrogen extraction from estuaries, which are often subject to excess nutrient loading from various land activities, causing eutrophication. This nitrogen extraction may be affected by a combination of various non-linear interactions between the cultured organisms and the receiving ecosystem. The present study used a coupled hydro-biogeochemical model to examine the interactive effects of various factors on the degree of estuarine nutrient mitigation by farmed bivalves. These factors included bay geomorphology (leaky, restricted and choked systems), river size (small and large rivers leading to moderate (105.9 Mt N yr-1) and high (529.6 Mt N yr-1) nutrient discharges), bivalve species (blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) and eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica)), farmed bivalve area (0, 10, 25 and 40% of estuarine surface area) and climate change (water temperature, sea level and precipitation reflecting either present or future (Horizon 2050) conditions). Model outputs indicated that bivalve culture was associated with the retention of nitrogen within estuaries, but that this alteration of nitrogen exchange between estuaries and the open ocean was not uniform across all tested variables and it depended on the nature of their interaction with the bivalves as well as their own dynamics. When nitrogen extraction resulting from harvest was factored in, however, bivalve culture was shown to provide a net nitrogen removal in the majority of the tested model scenarios. Mussels provided more nutrient mitigation than oysters, open systems were more resilient to change than closed ones, and mitigation potential was shown to generally increase with increasing bivalve biomass. Under projected future temperature conditions, nutrient mitigation from mussel farms was predicted to increase, while interactions with the oyster reproductive cycle led to both reduced harvested biomass and nutrient mitigation potential. This study presents the first quantification of the effects of various biological, physical, geomorphological and hydrodynamical processes on nutrient mitigation by bivalve aquaculture and will be critical in addressing questions related to eutrophication mitigation by bivalves and prediction of possible nutrient trading credits.