AUTHOR=Stephenson Fabrice , Rowden Ashley A. , Brough Tom , Petersen Grady , Bulmer Richard H. , Leathwick John R. , Lohrer Andrew M. , Ellis Joanne I. , Bowden David A. , Geange Shane W. , Funnell Greig A. , Freeman Debbie J. , Tunley Karen , Tellier Pierre , Clark Dana E. , Lundquist Carolyn J. , Greenfield Barry L. , Tuck Ian D. , Mouton Theophile L. , Neill Kate F. , Mackay Kevin A. , Pinkerton Matt H. , Anderson Owen F. , Gorman Richard M. , Mills Sadie , Watson Stephanie , Nelson Wendy A. , Hewitt Judi E. TITLE=Development of a Seafloor Community Classification for the New Zealand Region Using a Gradient Forest Approach JOURNAL=Frontiers in Marine Science VOLUME=8 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.792712 DOI=10.3389/fmars.2021.792712 ISSN=2296-7745 ABSTRACT=

To support ongoing marine spatial planning in New Zealand, a numerical environmental classification using Gradient Forest models was developed using a broad suite of biotic and high-resolution environmental predictor variables. Gradient Forest modeling uses species distribution data to control the selection, weighting and transformation of environmental predictors to maximise their correlation with species compositional turnover. A total of 630,997 records (39,766 unique locations) of 1,716 taxa living on or near the seafloor were used to inform the transformation of 20 gridded environmental variables to represent spatial patterns of compositional turnover in four biotic groups and the overall seafloor community. Compositional turnover of the overall community was classified using a hierarchical procedure to define groups at different levels of classification detail. The 75-group level classification was assessed as representing the highest number of groups that captured the majority of the variation across the New Zealand marine environment. We refer to this classification as the New Zealand “Seafloor Community Classification” (SCC). Associated uncertainty estimates of compositional turnover for each of the biotic groups and overall community were also produced, and an added measure of uncertainty – coverage of the environmental space – was developed to further highlight geographic areas where predictions may be less certain owing to low sampling effort. Environmental differences among the deep-water New Zealand SCC groups were relatively muted, but greater environmental differences were evident among groups at intermediate depths in line with well-defined oceanographic patterns observed in New Zealand’s oceans. Environmental differences became even more pronounced at shallow depths, where variation in more localised environmental conditions such as productivity, seafloor topography, seabed disturbance and tidal currents were important differentiating factors. Environmental similarities in New Zealand SCC groups were mirrored by their biological compositions. The New Zealand SCC is a significant advance on previous numerical classifications and includes a substantially wider range of biological and environmental data than has been attempted previously. The classification is critically appraised and considerations for use in spatial management are discussed.