Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Mar. Sci., 04 March 2021
Sec. Aquatic Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Marine N2 Fixation: Recent Discoveries and Future Challenges View all 14 articles

Editorial: Marine N2 Fixation: Recent Discoveries and Future Challenges

  • 1GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Marine Biogeochemistry, Kiel, Germany
  • 2National Research Council CNR, Institute of Marine Sciences ISMAR, Rome, Italy
  • 3Sorbonne Université, CNRS, LOMIC, Banyuls-sur-mer, France
  • 4Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Universidade de Vigo, Campus as Lagoas-Marcosende, Pontevedra, Spain

Marine N2 fixation is one of the most critical processes in the ocean, controlling the bioavailability of nitrogen (N), an essential building block for the maintenance of biological activity (Falkowski, 1997). Technological advances in the field of genomics (Zehr et al., 1998) unveiled the existence of a wide variety of both N2 fixers and N2 fixation strategies, challenging our knowledge of the factors controlling this important process. Temperature, N deficiency, as well as iron (Fe) and phosphorus availability have been traditionally thought to be the main factors controlling diazotrophs's distribution. These factors now appear insufficient to describe the variety of physiologies associated with the diversity of N2 fixers, and to explain the wider range of marine habitats occupied by these unique organisms (Zehr and Capone, 2020). At the same time, methodological limitations associated with the N2 fixation rate measurement (Mohr et al., 2010) have cast some doubt on the robustness of historical data, further increasing the uncertainty of global N2 fixation rates (Großkopf, 2012). These findings imply that we still have much to learn about the factors that control the magnitude and temporal and spatial variability of this important process, and its role in regulating ocean biogeochemistry. This Research Topic stems from two international workshops on the “Environmental Controls of Marine N2 Fixation” aiming to connect the scientific community working on N2 fixation. It gathers contributions from different expertise focusing on novel aspects of the physiology, ecology and biogeochemical role of diazotrophs, spanning from cellular to global scales with the aim of contributing to a more coherent understanding of the triggers and function of N2 fixation in the marine environment.

Current independent estimates of global marine N2 fixation from direct measurements, geochemical fingerprints on oceanic nutrient content and model simulations reviewed by Landolfi et al. in this Research Topic, range from about 100–200 TgNy−1. Large uncertainties still remain from the lack of a comprehensive understanding of the environmental controls and ecological interactions of marine N2 fixers. The application of molecular techniques allowed the detection of nifH genes in regions that extend far beyond the geographical domain of N2 fixation originally associated to warm tropical oligotrophic waters. Using molecular fingerprinting Fernandez-Mendez et al. report on the detection of nifH genes in the Arctic Ocean, and the existence of a large genetic diversity that appears distinct from surrounding oceanic regions. This wider distribution is further supported by year-round measurable N2 fixation rates in N-rich temperate waters of the upwelling system of the Iberian peninsula, that appear populated by genetically diverse diazotrophs as reported by the study of Moreira-Coello et al., challenging the traditional low-N paradigm. Oceanic environments are populated by diverse N2 fixing organisms, including non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs. Albeit expressing low fixation rates non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs thrive both in photic and aphotic regions as reviewed by Moisander et al., potentially making a large contribution to global rates of N2 fixation. In their perspectives Benavides, Bonnet et al. speculate that extrapolating the sparse low aphotic N2 fixation rates for the whole mesopelagic NO3-rich zone, would lead to a significant increase of the oceanic N inputs, largely compensating for the N loss via denitrification, and call for the consolidation of these extrapolations with future aphotic N2 fixation rate measurement studies.

Several contributions address the control of diazotroph's biogeography by resource availability. While desert dust is considered a primary source of iron (Fe) to the ocean, its low solubility (<12%, Jickells et al., 2005) prompts phytoplankton adaptive strategies to access this micronutrient in bioavailable forms. In controlled laboratory experiments, Polyviou et al. report on the substrate specific physiological and transcriptomic responses of Trichodesmium for Fe acquisition from complex matrices. Direct vicinity between cell and dust particles may enhance Fe bioavailability to Trichodesmium, suggesting that modes of Fe-supply may be important for the niche determination of this important diazotroph. Benavides, Martias et al. discuss the role of dissolved organic matter as a possible complementary source of energy and nutrients for both cyanobacterial and non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs.

Gradoville et al. used high-throughput 16S rRNA and nifH gene sequencing and metagenomics to describe the microbiome associated with Trichodesmium colonies in the North Pacific subtropical gyre. They find that colony morphology appears to be tied to different epibiont communities, uncovering the links between physiological characteristics and ecological functions. The fate and mortality pathways of diazotrophs and their effect on biogeochemistry is just starting to be explored. In this collection, Kuznecova et al. provide new insight on the role of virus-host interaction. They investigate how viral infections affect the growth, N2 fixation ability and gene expression of a bloom-forming heterocytous cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon flos-aquae.

Accurate rate measurements are key for assessing the global significance of N2 fixation. In a combination of dedicated laboratory experiments and a literature meta-analysis Wannike et al. constrain the errors associated with the 15N2 methods, that may lead to underestimate N2 fixation rates measurements. They find that the errors associated with the lack of equilibration of 15N2 are highly dependent on incubation time and experimental conditions. By comparing the retentive characteristics of filters for N2 fixation rates measurements, in different settings from coastal waters to the Baltic Sea and Pacific Ocean, Bombar et al. warn on the potential underestimation of N2 fixation by the use of borosilicate glass fiber filters (GF/F, Whatman) with a nominal pore size of 0.7 μm that are inadequate to capture small cells. Caputo et al. conducted a comparative analysis of two symbiotic N2-fixing cyanobacteria, the diazotrophs-diatoms associations (DDA) and diazotroph-prymnesiophyte known as UCYN-A, both providing fixed forms of N to the host. They warn on the pre-filtration step during qPCR nifH surveys that lead to systematic underestimation of large and chain-forming DDAs.

In summary, the contributions included in this Research Topic focused on novel aspects of the physiology and ecology of marine diazotrophs, addressing methodological limits and current gaps in our knowledge that make future predictions a challenge. These papers contribute toward a more comprehensive understanding of the controls of this key process, which is core for improving future predictions of marine N2 fixers under a fast-evolving climate.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Papers featured in this Special Issue have been leveraged from two workshops on the Environmental Controls of Marine N2 Fixation: Present Knowledge and Future Challenges that brought together a multidisciplinary group of marine N2 fixation experts, from genomics to global biogeochemistry, to consolidate current knowledge and define key uncertainties in current understanding of marine N2 fixation. We acknowledge the funding support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) project SFB754 and Euromarine 2015 Workshop grant.

References

Falkowski, P. G. (1997). Evolution of the nitrogen cycle and its influence on the biological sequestration of CO2 in the ocean. Nature 387, 272–275. doi: 10.1038/387272a0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Großkopf, T. (2012). Direct and indirect costs of dinitrogen fixation in Crocosphaera watsonii WH8501 and possible implications for the nitrogen cycle. Front. Microbiol. 3:236. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jickells, T. D., An, Z. S., Andersen, K. K., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., et al. (2005). Global iron connections between desert dust, ocean biogeochemistry, and climate. Science 308, 67–71. doi: 10.1126/science.1105959

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohr, W., Großkopf, T., Wallace, D. W. R., and LaRoche, J. (2010). Methodological underestimation of oceanic nitrogen fixation rates. PLoS ONE 5:e12583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zehr, J. P., and Capone, D. G. (2020). Changing perspectives in marine nitrogen fixation. Science 368:eaay9514. doi: 10.1126/science.aay9514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zehr, J. P., Mellon, M. T., and Zani, S. (1998). New nitrogen-fixing microorganisms detected in oligotrophic oceans by amplification of nitrogenase (nifH) genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3444–3450. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.9.3444-3450.1998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: N2 fixation, marine N inventory, environmental controls, aphotic N2 fixation, diversity, modeling

Citation: Landolfi A, Rabouille S and Mouriño-Carballido B (2021) Editorial: Marine N2 Fixation: Recent Discoveries and Future Challenges. Front. Mar. Sci. 8:664195. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.664195

Received: 04 February 2021; Accepted: 11 February 2021;
Published: 04 March 2021.

Edited and reviewed by: Lasse Riemann, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Copyright © 2021 Landolfi, Rabouille and Mouriño-Carballido. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Angela Landolfi, angela.landolfi@cnr.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.