AUTHOR=Everett Jason D. , Baird Mark E. , Buchanan Pearse , Bulman Cathy , Davies Claire , Downie Ryan , Griffiths Chris , Heneghan Ryan , Kloser Rudy J. , Laiolo Leonardo , Lara-Lopez Ana , Lozano-Montes Hector , Matear Richard J. , McEnnulty Felicity , Robson Barbara , Rochester Wayne , Skerratt Jenny , Smith James A. , Strzelecki Joanna , Suthers Iain M. , Swadling Kerrie M. , van Ruth Paul , Richardson Anthony J. TITLE=Modeling What We Sample and Sampling What We Model: Challenges for Zooplankton Model Assessment JOURNAL=Frontiers in Marine Science VOLUME=4 YEAR=2017 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2017.00077 DOI=10.3389/fmars.2017.00077 ISSN=2296-7745 ABSTRACT=

Zooplankton are the intermediate trophic level between phytoplankton and fish, and are an important component of carbon and nutrient cycles, accounting for a large proportion of the energy transfer to pelagic fishes and the deep ocean. Given zooplankton's importance, models need to adequately represent zooplankton dynamics. A major obstacle, though, is the lack of model assessment. Here we try and stimulate the assessment of zooplankton in models by filling three gaps. The first is that many zooplankton observationalists are unfamiliar with the biogeochemical, ecosystem, size-based and individual-based models that have zooplankton functional groups, so we describe their primary uses and how each typically represents zooplankton. The second gap is that many modelers are unaware of the zooplankton data that are available, and are unaccustomed to the different zooplankton sampling systems, so we describe the main sampling platforms and discuss their strengths and weaknesses for model assessment. Filling these gaps in our understanding of models and observations provides the necessary context to address the last gap—a blueprint for model assessment of zooplankton. We detail two ways that zooplankton biomass/abundance observations can be used to assess models: data wrangling that transforms observations to be more similar to model output; and observation models that transform model outputs to be more like observations. We hope that this review will encourage greater assessment of zooplankton in models and ultimately improve the representation of their dynamics.