Lowri Wilkie
Zoe Fisher
Andrew H. Kemp- 1School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
- 2Regional Neuropsychology and Community Brain Injury Service, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom
- 3Health and Wellbeing Academy, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
Introduction
The construct of wellbeing has been difficult to define and has avoided straightforward solutions (Bache et al., 2016). This also makes the topic a fascinating one to reflect on and study. Here we introduce the complex construct of wellbeing, then discuss how the vagus nerve might support the experience of it, before reflecting on some complexities and opportunities arising from a focus on vagal function as target for “inner development” and transformation of the self.
What is Wellbeing?
While illbeing and wellbeing are partly related, they are also distinct (Westerhof, 2010; Fisher et al., 2020; Hunter, 2020). This claim is supported by findings that people living with chronic conditions including mental illness (Goodman et al., 2018), heart disease (Magán et al., 2021) or acquired brain injury (Wilkie et al., 2021) have tremendous capacity to improve the determinants of wellbeing (see also Kemp et al., 2022). The field of positive psychology initiated its study on “human flourishing” using a concept of wellbeing defined purely by positive experiences. While these early foundations oriented psychology away from a skewed focus on dysfunction and illbeing, later “waves” of positive psychology and the more heterogeneous discipline of wellbeing science are expanding the focus to existential positive psychology (Wong, 2019; Wong et al., 2021), collective (social) (Atkinson et al., 2020; Waters et al., 2021) and planetary wellbeing (Antó et al., 2021; Community et al., 2021) (Lomas et al., 2020; see also Lomas, 2022). These developments reveal the need to redefine “wellbeing” in a more holistic and transdisciplinary manner.
Wellbeing as “Connection” SUPPORTED by Healthy Vagal Function
We have captured a role for the vagus in wellbeing in the development of our “GENIAL” model (Genomics–Environment–vagus Nerve–social Interaction–Allostatic regulation–Longevity), an evidence-based framework that integrates multi- and interdisciplinary findings from wellbeing science (Kemp et al., 2017; Fisher et al., 2020; Mead et al., 2021; Kemp and Fisher, 2022). The vagus nerve is the tenth cranial nerve that connects many different organs including heart, gut, liver and lungs and the primary nerve supporting the parasympathetic nervous system. This nerve is an ideal candidate for supporting wellbeing, given its regulatory role over the sympathetic nervous system (Porges, 2011; Deuchars et al., 2018), hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis (Porges, 2011; Keller et al., 2021), immune system (Tracey, 2002; Pavlov and Tracey, 2012) and gut-brain axis (Forsythe et al., 2014; Fülling et al., 2019). Critically, heart rate variability (or HRV) reflects an index of the functioning of the vagus nerve (Paso et al., 2013), and can be used as a target for tracking the impact of wellbeing-related interventions including for example, a healthy lifestyle (Jandackova et al., 2019), HRV biofeedback (Lehrer et al., 2020), mind-body techniques (Zou et al., 2018), compassion focused therapy (Bello et al., 2020), loving kindness meditation (Kok et al., 2013) and nature-based wellbeing interventions (Richardson et al., 2016).
We have argued that “wellbeing” needs to take into account the self, other people and the planet (Fisher et al., 2020; Kemp and Fisher, 2022; Kemp et al., 2022). Furthermore, if we were pressed to define “wellbeing” in a single word, we would suggest the word “connection”, which encapsulates (1) self-connection, (2) social-connection and (3) nature-connection. We further suggest that “connection” may be supported and promoted by functioning of the vagus. This suggestion is supported by Porges” polyvagal theory (Porges, 2011, 2021), which characterizes the (myelinated) vagus as the foundation for the social engagement system, facilitating the experience of safety outside of awareness (neuroception). Higher levels of vagally-mediated HRV will therefore facilitate the experience of safety and increase capacity for connection and wellbeing, and we note above that HRV may provide a specific target for improving wellbeing-related outcomes. We now review key concepts relating to self-connection, social-connection and nature-connection, highlighting a role for vagal function in each.
Connection to Self and the Promotion of Individual Wellbeing
“Self-connection” is rooted in the awareness of oneself, and the acceptance and alignment of behavior based on that awareness (e.g., Klussman, 2021). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), for example, utilizes mindfulness, acceptance, awareness and value-based action (i.e., behavioral alignment) to bring about a more connected (transcendent) self (Edwards et al., 2019; Hayes, 2019). We further suggest that self-connected individuals will display stronger mind-body integration, indexed through higher levels of vagal function. Eighty percent of vagal nerve fibers are afferent in nature, which carry information from the viscera to the brain (Goehler et al., 2000; Saper, 2002) and provide a mechanism by which health behaviors can impact on psychological experience. One example is how the vagus uses interoception to differentiate between healthy and pathogenic bacteria in the gut, then relays this information to the brain, modulating stress and inflammation (Bonaz et al., 2018; Breit et al., 2018; Fülling et al., 2019). Vagal function is also associated with various other relevant constructs to self-connection including positive emotion (Kok et al., 2013), meaning in life (Dang et al., 2021), compassion (Bello et al., 2020), emotional regulation (Mather and Thayer, 2018), self-rated health (Jarczok et al., 2015) and psychological flexibility (Kashdan and Rottenberg, 2010; Pinna and Edwards, 2020).
Connection to Others and Promotion of Collective Wellbeing
Self-connection may also facilitate collective wellbeing, which is defined as a group of individuals who independently and interdependently feel good and function well (Allison et al., 2021). For example, social relational emotions including compassion, gratitude and awe support an individual's capacity to connect with others and are powerful determinants of prosocial behavior (Bartlett and DeSteno, 2005; Grant and Gino, 2010; Lindsay and Creswell, 2014; Stellar et al., 2017). Moreover, vagal function has been shown to increase perceived connectedness, subsequently increasing positive emotions, and further increasing vagal function in an upward spiral relationship (Geisler et al., 2013; Kok et al., 2013). According to polyvagal theory (Porges, 2011, 2021), the myelinated vagus in combination with other cranial nerves provides a “vagal brake” over the phylogenetically older sympathetic nervous system and unmyelinated vagus facilitating social engagement and interaction, and this process is outside of awareness. Acute augmentation of oxytocin—a neuropeptide that plays a regulatory role in human social behavior—has been shown to increase HRV at rest without a change in mood (Kemp et al., 2012), a finding interpreted as facilitating the capacity for social engagement. Further insights on the role of HRV in social-connection are revealed in research on cardiac synchrony in romantic couples (Coutinho et al., 2021). Negative (antiphase) synchrony of HRV was reported regardless of whether discussion was positive or negative, and these findings were interpreted to reflect a “physiological dance of co-regulation”, in which partner A decreased their ability to self-regulate arousal (decreased HRV) while partner B increased their own ability (increased HRV). Social-connection has been described as a basic psychological need that is critical for individual wellbeing (Baumeister and Leary, 1995; Deci and Ryan, 2014) and may also lay the foundations for connecting to non-human others (i.e. nature) (Petersen et al., 2019), a topic we turn to next.
Connection to Nature and Promotion of Planetary Wellbeing
Social relational emotions (such as awe) may directly contribute to the experience of wellbeing when in nature (Anderson et al., 2018; Petersen et al., 2019). As with social connectedness, nature-connection may also reflect a basic psychological need (Baxter and Pelletier, 2019). A recently published pragmatic-controlled trial of “forest bathing” (McEwan et al., 2021) reported improvements in positive emotions, nature connection and compassion, but interestingly, only 57% of participants displayed an increase in HRV. The authors attributed HRV decreases to the experience of biophobia, consistent with the evolutionary model of wellbeing (Richardson et al., 2016), which highlights how the natural environment may also trigger “primed” emotional responses associated with anxiety in some people. Despite this variability across participants, findings from meta-analysis (Richardson et al., 2016) have shown that natural environments promote greater vagal function relative to urban environments. Feelings of belonging, togetherness and connection not only support capacity for nature-connection but may also provide a basis for caring about climate-related matters (Stoknes, 2015; Pihkala, 2022), providing systems-informed opportunities for connecting wellbeing with major societal challenges such as the climate emergency.
The Relationship Between Vagal Function and Wellbeing
We suggest here that vagal function may provide an upstream mediator of pathways to wellbeing, rather than a direct proxy of it. While there is a significant body of evidence linking vagal function to aspects of wellbeing, there is less support for a direct link. Several large studies have now reported no direct associations with wellbeing (Sloan et al., 2017; Tegegne et al., 2018; Behnke et al., 2022). There are several potential explanations for these contradictory findings including definitional issues and methodological considerations.
Wellbeing is a complex construct and it is possible therefore that vagal function is associated with some aspects of wellbeing (e.g., physical health, social connection) more than others. For example, a study on over 8 million fitbit users (Natarajan et al., 2020) reported that young people who took 12,000–13,000 steps a day displayed 21.2% (males) and 22.9% (females) greater high frequency HRV than those who took 5,000–6,000 steps. However, it is important not to overlook the bidirectional relationships between mental and physical health, and the key role of HRV in this regard (Kemp and Quintana, 2013). There are also methodological considerations when conducting HRV research, including adequate control of potential confounding, especially when certain variables cannot be randomly allocated to groups (Miller and Chapman, 2001). This situation can lead to statistical anomalies including Simpon's paradox, which refers to the diminution or enhancement of an association between two variables (e.g. HRV and wellbeing) when a third confounding variable is “corrected” or “controlled” (e.g., age, sex, psychopathology) (Miller and Chapman, 2001; Tu et al., 2008). Novel analytical methods such as propensity score weighting using generalized boosted modeling may help to overcome the limitations of traditional analysis (e.g., Kemp et al., 2014), but are yet to be applied to associations between HRV and wellbeing. Finally, there is a need to move beyond simplistic models and toward more sophisticated models that better reflect the complexity and inter-relationships between various proposed mechanisms and their moderators, highlighting a need for future work involving causal path modeling to further explore putative relationships. A related point is the potential for low coherence between physiological responses and subjective report, which may reflect denial or poor interoceptive capacities (Vella-Brodrick et al., 2022). In summary, we suggest that HRV may provide an upstream mediator of wellbeing, rather than a surrogate measure of it.
Discussion and Conclusions
The science of wellbeing has given rise to new opportunities including interventions designed to improve wellbeing in people living with chronic conditions (e.g., Tulip et al., 2020; Wilkie et al., 2021; Gibbs et al., 2022), for whom interventions have typically focused on reducing illbeing. Wellbeing in chronic conditions may be promoted through efforts to tackle wellbeing at multiple levels of scale for system-wide change, consistent with a systems-informed positive psychology (Kern et al., 2020). For instance, we found that a group-based surf therapy intervention for people with acquired brain injury involving a partnership across academia, healthcare and community-based organizations may facilitate a cascade of mechanisms supporting positive change (Wilkie et al., 2021; Gibbs et al., 2022). This provides a concrete example of how our GENIAL model has been applied, taking into consideration individual, community, environment and behavior change while tackling entrenched socio-structural barriers (e.g., financial constraints, disciplinary silos) (see also Kemp and Fisher, 2022). As well as focus on the individual and groups, our partnerships enable us to bridge the gap between statutory services and local community resources capable of facilitating the determinants of wellbeing at a higher level of scale.
As the impacts of modern living on the natural environment continue to worsen (Ripple et al., 2021), wellbeing interventions that align with “sustainable wellbeing”—the promotion of wellbeing that does not come at a cost to other people or the natural environment (O'Brien, 2016)—are needed. Research shows that spending time in the natural environment—an activity that that has been shown to improve vagal function—supports individual as well as collective wellbeing (Waters et al., 2021) while also promoting pro-environmental behaviors (Martin et al., 2020). The therapist of the future will need to embrace emerging frameworks such as the power threat meaning framework (Johnstone and Boyle, 2018), that support non-anthologizing understandings of different reactions to societal challenges including climate breakdown (Morgan et al., 2022), which is expected to have devastating impacts on health and wellbeing (Fritze et al., 2008; Ellis and Albrecht, 2017; Kelman et al., 2021). Vagal function may provide an appropriate target for objectively measuring the impacts of a wide range of interventions to support connections to self, others and nature, laying the foundations for transformation of the self and progress on the “inner development goals” which are now seen as essential for making progress on the “sustainable development goals” (Wamsler and Brink, 2018; Woiwode et al., 2021) [see also: https://www.innerdevelopmentgoals.org/].
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Allison, L., Waters, L., and Kern, M. L. (2021). Flourishing classrooms: applying a systems-informed approach to positive education. Contemporary School Psychol. 25, 395–405. doi: 10.1007/s40688-019-00267-8
Anderson, C. L., Monroy, M., and Keltner, D. (2018). Awe in nature heals: evidence from military veterans, at-risk youth, and college students. Emotion. 18, 1195–1202. doi: 10.1037/emo0000442
Antó, J. M., Martí, J. L., Casals, J., Bou-Habib, P., Casal, P., Fleurbaey, M., et al. (2021). The Planetary wellbeing initiative: pursuing the sustainable development goals in higher education. Sustainability. 13, 3372. doi: 10.3390/su13063372
Atkinson, S., Bagnall, A.-M., Corcoran, R., South, J., and Curtis, S. (2020). Being well together: individual subjective and community wellbeing. J. Happiness Stud. 21, 1903–1921. doi: 10.1007/s10902-019-00146-2
Bache, I., Reardon, L., and Anand, P. (2016). Wellbeing as a wicked problem: navigating the arguments for the role of government. J. Happiness Stud. 17, 893–912. doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9623-y
Bartlett, M. Y., and DeSteno, D. (2005). Gratitude and prosocial behavior. Psychol. Sci. 17, 319–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01705.x
Baumeister, R. F., and Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Baxter, D. E., and Pelletier, L. G. (2019). Is nature relatedness a basic human psychological need? A critical examination of the extant literature. Can. Psychol. 60, 21–34. doi: 10.1037/cap0000145
Behnke, M., Kreibig, S. D., Kaczmarek, L. D., Assink, M., and Gross, J. J. (2022). Autonomic nervous system activity during positive emotions: a meta-analytic review. Emot. Rev. 14, 132–160. doi: 10.1177/17540739211073084
Bello, M. D., Carnevali, L., Petrocchi, N., Thayer, J. F., Gilbert, P., and Ottaviani, C. (2020). The compassionate vagus: a meta-analysis on the connection between compassion and heart rate variability. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 116, 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.06.016
Bonaz, B., Bazin, T., and Pellissier, S. (2018). The vagus nerve at the interface of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Front. Neurosci. 12, 49. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00049
Breit, S., Kupferberg, A., Rogler, G., and Hasler, G. (2018). Vagus nerve as modulator of the brain–gut axis in psychiatric and inflammatory disorders. Front. Psychiatry. 9, 44. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044
Community, J. W., Kortetmäki, T., Puurtinen, M., Salo, M., Aro, R., Baumeister, S., et al. (2021). Planetary well-being. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 8, 258. doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00899-3
Coutinho, J., Pereira, A., Oliveira-Silva, P., Meier, D., Lourenço, V., and Tschacher, W. (2021). When our hearts beat together: Cardiac synchrony as an entry point to understand dyadic co-regulation in couples. Psychophysiology. 58, e13739. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13739
Dang, K., Kirk, M. A., Monette, G., Katz, J., and Ritvo, P. (2021). Meaning in life and vagally-mediated heart rate variability: Evidence of a quadratic relationship at baseline and vagal reactivity differences. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 165, 101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.03.001
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2014). Human Motivation and Interpersonal Relationships, Theory, Research, and Applications. 53–73. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_3
Deuchars, S. A., Lall, V. K., Clancy, J., Mahadi, M., Murray, A., Peers, L., et al. (2018). Mechanisms underpinning sympathetic nervous activity and its modulation using transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. Exp. Physiol. 103, 326–331. doi: 10.1113/EP086433
Edwards, D. J., Rainey, E., Boukouvala, V., Wells, Y., Bennett, P., Tree, J., et al. (2019). Novel ACT-based eHealth psychoeducational intervention for students with mental distress: a study protocol for a mixed-methodology pilot trial. BMJ Open. 9, e029411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029411
Ellis, N. R., and Albrecht, G. A. (2017). Climate change threats to family farmers' sense of place and mental wellbeing: a case study from the Western Australian Wheatbelt. Soc. Sci. Med. 175, 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.009
Fisher, Z., Galloghly, E., Boglo, E., Gracey, F., and Kemp, A. (2020). “Emotion, Wellbeing and the Neurological Disorders,” in Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Forsythe, P., Bienenstock, J., and Kunze, W. A. (2014). Microbial Endocrinology: The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Health and Disease. New York: Springer. 115–133. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0897-4_5
Fritze, J. G., Blashki, G. A., Burke, S., and Wiseman, J. (2008). Hope, despair and transformation: climate change and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing. Int. J. Ment. Health Syst. 2, 13–13. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-2-13
Fülling, C., Dinan, T. G., and Cryan, J. F. (2019). Gut microbe to brain signaling: what happens in vagus. Neuron. 101, 998–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.02.008
Geisler, F. C. M., Kubiak, T., Siewert, K., and Weber, H. (2013). Cardiac vagal tone is associated with social engagement and self-regulation. Biol. Psychol. 93, 279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.013
Gibbs, K., Wilkie, L., Jarman, J., Barker-Smith, A., Kemp, A. H., and Fisher, Z. (2022). Riding the wave into wellbeing: A qualitative evaluation of surf therapy for individuals living with acquired brain injury. PLoS ONE. 17, e0266388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266388
Goehler, L. E., Gaykema, R. P. A., Hansen, M. K., Anderson, K., Maier, S. F., and Watkins, L. R. (2000). Vagal immune-to-brain communication: a visceral chemosensory pathway. Autonomic Neurosci. 85, 49–59. doi: 10.1016/S1566-0702(00)00219-8
Goodman, F. R., Doorley, J. D., and Kashdan, T. B. (2018). “Well-being and Psychopathology: A Deep Exploration into Positive Emotions, Meaning and Purpose in Life, and Social Relationships,” in Handbook of Well-Being, Diener, E., Oishi, S., and Tay, L. (Eds.). Salt Lake City: DEF Publishers.
Grant, A. M., and Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98, 946–955. doi: 10.1037/a0017935
Hunter, R. (2020). A clinician and service user's perspective on managing ms: pleasure, purpose, practice. Front. Psychol. 11, 709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00709
Jandackova, V. K., Scholes, S., Britton, A., and Steptoe, A. (2019). healthy lifestyle and cardiac vagal modulation over 10 years: whitehall II cohort study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 8, e012420. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012420
Jarczok, M. N., Kleber, M. E., Koenig, J., Loerbroks, A., Herr, R. M., Hoffmann, K., et al. (2015). Investigating the associations of self-rated health: heart rate variability is more strongly associated than inflammatory and other frequently used biomarkers in a cross sectional occupational sample. PLoS ONE. 10, e0117196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117196
Johnstone, L., and Boyle, M. (2018). The Power Threat Meaning Framework: Towards the identification of patterns in emotional distress, unusual experiences and troubled or troubling behaviour, as an alternative to functional psychiatric diagnosis. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
Kashdan, T. B., and Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30, 865–878. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
Keller, B. N., Snyder, A. E., Coker, C. R., Aguilar, E. A., O'Brien, M. K., Bingaman, S. S., et al. (2021). The vagus nerve is critical for regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to acute stress. BioRxiv. 2021.06.03.446790. doi: 10.1101/2021.06.03.446790
Kelman, I., Ayeb-Karlsson, S., Rose-Clarke, K., Prost, A., Ronneberg, E., Wheeler, N., et al. (2021). A review of mental health and wellbeing under climate change in small island developing states (SIDS). Environm. Res. Lett. 16, 033007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe57d
Kemp, A. H., Arias, J. A., and Fisher, Z. (2017). “Social Ties, Health and Wellbeing: A Literature Review and Model”, in Neuroscience and Social Science, The Missing Link. Springer International Publishing. 397–427. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68421-5_17
Kemp, A. H., Brunoni, A. R., Santos, I. S., Nunes, M. A., Dantas, E. M., Figueiredo, R. C., et al. (2014). Effects of depression, anxiety, comorbidity, and antidepressants on resting-state heart rate and its variability: an ELSA-Brasil cohort baseline study. Am. J. Psychiatry. 171, 1328 1334. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13121605
Kemp, A. H., and Fisher, Z. (2022). Wellbeing, whole health and societal transformation: theoretical insights and practical applications. Glob. Adv. Health Med. 11, 21649561211073076. doi: 10.1177/21649561211073077
Kemp, A. H., and Quintana, D. S. (2013). The relationship between mental and physical health: Insights from the study of heart rate variability. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 89, 288–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.018
Kemp, A. H., Quintana, D. S., Kuhnert, R. -L., Griffiths, K., Hickie, I. B., and Guastella, A. J. (2012). Oxytocin increases heart rate variability in humans at rest: Implications for social approach-related motivation and capacity for social engagement. PLoS ONE. 7:e44014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044014
Kemp, A. H., Tree, J., Gracey, F., and Fisher, Z. (2022). Editorial: improving wellbeing in patients with chronic conditions: theory, evidence, and opportunities. Front. Psychol. 13, 868810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.868810
Kern, M. L., Williams, P., Spong, C., Colla, R., Sharma, K., Downie, A., et al. (2020). Systems informed positive psychology. J. Posit. Psychol. 15, 705–715. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2019.1639799
Klussman, K. (2021). Connection: How to Find the Life You're Looking for in the Life You Have. Louisville, KY: Sounds True.
Kok, B., Coffey, K., Cohn, M., Catalino, L., Vacharkulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S., et al. (2013). How positive emotions build physical health: perceived positive social connections account for the upward spiral between positive emotions and vagal tone. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1123–1132. doi: 10.1177/0956797612470827
Lehrer, P., Kaur, K., Sharma, A., Shah, K., Huseby, R., Bhavsar, J., et al. (2020). Heart rate variability biofeedback improves emotional and physical health and performance: a systematic review and meta analysis. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback. 45, 109–129. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z
Lindsay, E. K., and Creswell, J. D. (2014). Helping the self help others: self-affirmation increases self-compassion and pro-social behaviors. Front. Psychol. 5, 421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00421
Lomas, T. (2022). Making waves in the great ocean: a historical perspective on the emergence and evolution of wellbeing scholarship. J. Posit. Psychol. 17, 257–270. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2021.2016900
Lomas, T., Waters, L., Williams, P., Oades, L. G., and Kern, M. L. (2020). Third wave positive psychology: broadening towards complexity. J. Posit. Psychol. 1–15. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2020.1805501
Magán, I., Jurado-Barba, R., Casado, L., Barnum, H., Jeon, A., Hernandez, A. V., et al. (2021). Efficacy of psychological interventions on clinical outcomes of coronary artery disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Psychosom. Res. 153, 110710. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110710
Martin, L., White, M. P., Hunt, A., Richardson, M., Pahl, S., and Burt, J. (2020). Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. J. Environ. Psychol., 68, 101389. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389
Mather, M., and Thayer, J. F. (2018). How heart rate variability affects emotion regulation brain networks. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 19, 98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.12.017
McEwan, K., Giles, D., Clarke, F. J., Kotera, Y., Evans, G., Terebenina, O., et al. (2021). A pragmatic controlled trial of forest bathing compared with compassionate mind training in the UK: impacts on self-reported wellbeing and heart rate variability. Sustainability. 13, 1380. doi: 10.3390/su13031380
Mead, J., Fisher, Z., and Kemp, A. H. (2021). Moving beyond disciplinary silos towards a transdisciplinary model of wellbeing: an invited review. Front. Psychol. 12, 642093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642093
Miller, G. A., and Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 110, 4048. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.40
Morgan, G., Barnwell, G., Johnstone, L., Shukla, K., and Mitchell, A. (2022). The power threat meaning framework and the climate and ecological crises. Psychol. Society. 63, 83–109. Available online at: https://www.pins.org.za/pins/pins63/PINS-Issue-63_Article_Morgan_Barnwell_Johnstone_Shukla_Mitchell.pdf
Natarajan, A., Pantelopoulos, A., Emir-Farinas, H., and Natarajan, P. (2020). Heart rate variability with photoplethysmography in 8 million individuals: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet Digital Health. 2, e650–e657. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30246-6
O'Brien, C. (2016). Education for Sustainable Happiness and Well-Being. Abingdon:Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315630946
Paso, G. A. R., del Langewitz, W., Mulder, L. J. M., Roon, A., and Duschek, S. (2013). The utility of low frequency heart rate variability as an index of sympathetic cardiac tone: A review with emphasis on a reanalysis of previous studies. Psychophysiology. 50, 477–487. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12027
Pavlov, V., and Tracey, K. (2012). The vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex-linking immunity and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinology. 8, 743754. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.189
Petersen, E., Fiske, A. P., and Schubert, T. W. (2019). The role of social relational emotions for human-nature connectedness. Front. Psychol. 10, 2759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02759
Pihkala, P. (2022). Toward a taxonomy of climate emotions. Front. Climate. 3, 738154. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2021.738154
Pinna, T., and Edwards, D. J. (2020). A systematic review of associations between interoception, vagal tone, and emotional regulation: potential applications for mental health, wellbeing, psychological flexibility, and chronic conditions. Front. Psychol. 11, 1792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01792
Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation (1st ed.). London: W. W. Norton and Company.
Porges, S. W. (2021). Polyvagal theory: a biobehavioral journey to sociality. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinol. 7, 100069. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100069
Richardson, M., McEwan, K., Maratos, F., and Sheffield, D. (2016). Joy and calm: how an evolutionary functional model of affect regulation informs positive emotions in nature. Evol. Psychol. 2, 308–320. doi: 10.1007/s40806-016-0065-5
Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Gregg, J. W., Lenton, T. M., Palomo, I., et al. (2021). World scientists' warning of a climate emergency 2021. BioScience. 71, 894–898. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab079
Saper, C. B. (2002). The central autonomic nervous system: conscious visceral perception and autonomic pattern generation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 433–469. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.032502.111311
Sloan, R. P., Schwarz, E., McKinley, P. S., Weinstein, M., Love, G., Ryff, C., et al. (2017). Vagally-mediated heart rate variability and indices of well-being: Results of a nationally representative study. Health Psychol. 36, 73. doi: 10.1037/hea0000397
Stellar, J. E., Gordon, A. M., Piff, P. K., Cordaro, D., Anderson, C. L., Bai, Y., et al. (2017). Self-transcendent emotions and their social functions: compassion, gratitude, and awe bind us to others through prosociality. Emotion Rev. 9, 200–207. doi: 10.1177/1754073916684557
Stoknes, P. S. (2015). What We Think About When We Try Not to Think About Global Warming: Toward a New Psychology of Climate Action. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Tegegne, B. S., Man, T., Roon, A. M., van Riese, H., and Snieder, H. (2018). Determinants of heart rate variability in the general population: the Lifelines Cohort Study. Heart Rhythm. 15, 1552–1558. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.006
Tu, Y.-K., Gunnell, D., and Gilthorpe, M. S. (2008). Simpson's paradox, lord's paradox, and suppression effects are the same phenomenon – the reversal paradox. Emerg. Themes Epidemiol., 5, 2. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-5-2
Tulip, C., Fisher, Z., Bankhead, H., Wilkie, L., Pridmore, J., Gracey, F., et al. (2020). Building wellbeing in people with chronic conditions: a qualitative evaluation of an 8-week positive psychotherapy intervention for people living with an acquired brain injury. Front. Psychol. 11:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00066
Vella-Brodrick, D. A., Gill, A., and Patrick, K. (2022). Seeing is believing: making wellbeing more tangible. Front. Psychol. 13, 809108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809108
Wamsler, C., and Brink, E. (2018). Mindsets for sustainability: exploring the link between mindfulness and sustainable climate adaptation. Ecol. Econ. 151, 55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.029
Waters, L., Cameron, K., Nelson-Coffey, S. K., Crone, D. L., Kern, M. L., Lomas, T., et al. (2021). Collective wellbeing and posttraumatic growth during COVID-19: how positive psychology can help families, schools, workplaces and marginalized communities. J. Posit. Psychol. 1–29. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2021.1940251
Westerhof, C. L. M. K. G. J. (2010). Mental illness and mental health: the two continua model across the lifespan. J. Adult Dev. 17, 110–119. doi: 10.1007/s10804-009-9082-y
Wilkie, L., Arroyo, P., Conibeer, H., Kemp, A. H., and Fisher, Z. (2021). The impact of psycho-social interventions on the wellbeing of individuals with acquired brain injury during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol. 12, 648286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648286
Woiwode, C., Schäpke, N., Bina, O., Veciana, S., Kunze, I., Parodi, O., et al. (2021). Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection. Sustainabil. Sci. 16, 841–858. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00882-y
Wong, P. P. T. P. (2019). Second wave positive psychology's (PP 2.0) contribution to counselling psychology. Couns. Psychol. Q. 32:3–4, 275–284. doi: 10.1080/09515070.2019.1671320
Wong, P. T. P., Mayer, C.-H., and Arslan, G. (2021). Editorial: COVID-19 and existential positive psychology (PP2.0): the new science of self-transcendence. Front. Psychol. 12, 800308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800308
Zou, L., Sasaki, J. E., Wei, G.-X., Huang, T., Yeung, A. S., Neto, O. B., et al. (2018). Effects of mind–body exercises (Tai Chi/Yoga) on heart rate variability parameters and perceived stress: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Clin. Med. 7, 404. doi: 10.3390/jcm7110404
Keywords: heart rate variability, vagal function, emotion, self-connection, social-connection, nature-connection, climate psychology
Citation: Wilkie L, Fisher Z and Kemp AH (2022) The Complex Construct of Wellbeing and the Role of Vagal Function. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 16:925664. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.925664
Received: 21 April 2022; Accepted: 21 June 2022;
Published: 07 July 2022.
Edited by:
Adrián Ezequiel Yoris, Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva, ArgentinaReviewed by:
Ahsan H. Khandoker, Khalifa University, United Arab EmiratesPhyllis Kravet Stein, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
Richard Gevirtz, Alliant International University, United States
Copyright © 2022 Wilkie, Fisher and Kemp. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Andrew H. Kemp, YS5oLmtlbXAmI3gwMDA0MDtzd2Fuc2VhLmFjLnVr