Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Insect Sci.
Sec. Insect Economics
Volume 4 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/finsc.2024.1500542
This article is part of the Research Topic Pest Management by Small-Holder Farmers View all 5 articles

Pesticidal plant extracts effect against major lepidopteran insect pests and their natural enemies in rice Oryza sativa L

Provisionally accepted
Atanu Seni Atanu Seni 1,2*Rini Pal Rini Pal 1,3Sanjukta Mohapatra Sanjukta Mohapatra 1,4Dipankar Mandal Dipankar Mandal 1,3Sushil Kumar Bansude Sushil Kumar Bansude 1,5Pinki Seth Pinki Seth 1,6Sarita Barla Sarita Barla 1,7Jubuli Sahu Jubuli Sahu 1,7
  • 1 Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India
  • 2 Scientist (Entomology), Sambalpur,Odisha,India, India
  • 3 Scientist (Plant Pathology), Sambalpur,Odisha,India, India
  • 4 Senior Scientist (Agronomy), Sambalpur,Odisha,India, India
  • 5 Scientist (Agril. Engineering), Sambalpur,Odisha,India, India
  • 6 Scientist (Soil Science), Sambalpur,Odisha,India, India
  • 7 Scientist (Agronomy), Sambalpur,Odisha,India, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Extracts of plants have been used to manage various insect pests, but little information is available about how effective they are to reduce crop damage, or how they affect crop yield and beneficial insects in rice.Extracts from Azadirachta indica leaves, Lantana camara leaves, Nerium oleander leaves, Aegle marmelos leaves, Allium sativum cloves, Citrus limon fruits known to have insecticidal properties, were compared with two checks viz. Azadirachtin 1 EC and standard insecticide, Acephate 95 SG for their efficacy against yellow stem borer (YSB), Scirpophaga incertulas (Walk.), and rice leaf folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guence) and natural enemies in cultivated rice in Sambalpur, Odisha, India. Untreated rice plants served as control. Adjuvant, Tween 20 @ 1% was added with all the botanical extracts except commercial formulation. Plant damage, insect population numbers and yield were monitored during two consecutive wet seasons from 2022 to 2023. Mean rice yield was significantly higher in the A. indica and Acephate 95 SG treatments i.e. 4.68 t/ha and 4.66 t/ha, respectively compared to the control (2.27 t/ha) and were significantly at par with each other. The L. camara and A. indica treatment was effective against both the major lepidopteran rice insect pests. The highest cost-benefit ratio of (1: 4.65) was obtained from Acephate treatment and was closely followed by A. indica treatment (1: 3.74).All the studied botanicals had less impact on natural enemies than synthetic chemicals. Among these botanicals, the maximum mean population of predators like spiders, carabid beetle and parasitoids like Tetrastichus schoenobii, Telenomus dignus and Trichogramma japonicum were observed in A. indica and A. marmelos treatments. Although all the studied botanicals were effective against both the major insect pests in rice, A. indica, A. marmelos, A. sativum and L. camara treatments showed the most promising against rice insect pest management so, they may be incorporated into integrated pest management of rice.

    Keywords: botanicals, Economics, insecticide, IPM, parasitoids, predators, yield

    Received: 23 Sep 2024; Accepted: 09 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Seni, Pal, Mohapatra, Mandal, Bansude, Seth, Barla and Sahu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Atanu Seni, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.