Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Insect Sci., 03 April 2023
Sec. Insect Health and Pathology
This article is part of the Research Topic Obstacles, Advantages and Recent Progress in Honey Bee Virus Research View all 5 articles

Editorial: Obstacles, advantages, and recent progress in honey bee virus research

  • College of Animal Science (College of Bee Science), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Exploring the unknown and conquering obstacles are always important for insect pathogen studies. The opportunities for exploiting new technologies and materials will always be tempting to researchers in this field. In this Research Topic, many scientists utilized new materials and methods to identify evidence that may lead to a further understanding of bee pathogens. Among the pathogens of interest, deformed wing virus (DWV) and its subtypes were the major viral pathogens addressed in this Research Topic. DWV is proposed to be a quasi-species (1), loosely consisting of subtypes that were previously considered as separated virus species. Subtype A was the original DWV, and subtype B was Varroa destructor virus-1 (VDV-1), named since the first identification was in Varroa mites (2). DWV subtypes A and B largely overlap in distribution and can co-infect the same hosts although the factors involved with these co-infections are not yet fully revealed. In addition to subtypes A and B, DWV quasi-species may contain subtype C and Kakugo virus, but these two subtypes have not been formally recognized. Kakugo virus was identified in the central neuron system of unusually aggressive bees in Japan (3). Kakugo virus shares 98% genome similarity with DWV-A but seems to enhance aggressive behaviors that have not been identified in DWV-A infections. These DWV subtypes have different regional distributions. Kakugo virus might have a limited distribution in East Asia and be better adapted to environments with both domestic European and Asian honey bees based on my preliminary survey. However, this preliminary observation was not fully supported by Zhang et al. as seen in their article published on this Research Topic. They analyzed four different genome fragments from DWV variants identified in European and Asian honey bees, wasps, and stingless bee taxa that were poorly addressed in previous studies. Another interesting research direction of the DWV quasi-species is how these subtypes compete within the same host and if Varroa mite has a specific role in the subtype competitions. Bai et al. in this Research Topic used long-read sequencing, also known as third-generation sequencing, to identify associations between DWV variants and Varroa mite haplotypes. They showed that DWV variants associated with mites tend to be regionally distributed. Penn et al. investigated the factors that could affect DWV subtypes within the same bee species, Apis mellifera, under different treatments. Interestingly, they found that creating a wound on the bees alone could significantly alter the infection dynamics between DWV-A and - B, and infection intensities were distributed differently in tissues.

Identifying novel anti-pathogenic molecules in honey bees is always an interesting challenge. Insects have a vast diversity, including in their responses to pathogens. Some common immune responses of insects, such as melanization cascade that involve phenol-oxidase and cellular immune responses that use phagocytosis, have been listed in textbooks. These responses were revealed in the earlier days by studying bacterial and fungal pathogens that can be visible under microscopes, leading to intuitive identifications of pathogens and host immune responses. In addition, the in-vitro cultures and consequent isolation of bacteria and fungi were well-developed and have been applied to studying the anti-microbial activities of insects. In contrast, these research tools were unavailable for virus-related immune responses, slowing research progress. However, antiviral responses in bees are critical in studies addressing virus diseases and their impacts on population decline. Moreover, insect antiviral immune responses are difficult to predict using gene sequences because of the high diversity in both hosts and viruses. Although the honey bee genome is relatively well-annotated, research outcomes from Drosophila or Anopheles insects may not be able to find a direct link in bees using sequence similarities. De novo studies are still required in many scenarios. In this Research Topic, McMenamin et al. identified a novel protein Bap1 involved in honey bee antiviral responses using transcriptomic methods and the Sindbis virus as a surrogate virus for in vivo infection studies. Bap1 is not universally present in insects; however, the most closely related orthology was discovered in cockroaches, which is intriguing since they are also susceptible to DWV infection (4) despite not being more closely related to the virus's usual insect hosts.

In summary, research articles on this Research Topic reported the findings of DWV subtypes and a novel antiviral protein Bap1. More novel antiviral proteins could soon be identified with the protocols for Bap1 identification, and the availability of laboratory-synthesized viral clones with fluorescence labels (5, 6). In addition, the emergence and evolution of DWV subtypes are yet to be fully understood. Whether subtype competition leads to stable levels is not yet known. It will be intriguing to find DWV subtype replacement events or the evolution of novel subtypes in the future.

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Mordecai GJ, Wilfert L, Martin SJ, Jones IM, Schroeder DC. Diversity in a honey bee pathogen: first report of a third master variant of the deformed wing virus quasispecies. ISME J (2016) 10:1264–73. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ongus JR, Peters D, Bonmatin J-M, Bengsch E, Vlak JM, van Oers MM. Complete sequence of a picorna-like virus of the genus iflavirus replicating in the mite varroa destructor. J Gen Virol (2004) 85:3747–55. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80470-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Fujiyuki T, Matsuzaka E, Nakaoka T, Takeuchi H, Wakamoto A, Ohka S, et al. Distribution of kakugo virus and its effects on the gene expression profile in the brain of the worker honeybee apis mellifera l. J Virol (2009) 83:11560–68. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00519-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Vršanský P, Vršanská L, Beňo M, Bao T, Lei X, Ren X, et al. Pathogenic DWV infection symptoms in a Cretaceous cockroach. Palaeontographica Abteilung -Stuttgart (2019) 314(1-3):1–10. doi: 10.1127/pala/2019/0084

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Jin L, Mehmood S, Zhang G, Song Y, Su S, Huang S, et al. Visualizing sacbrood virus of honey bees via transformation and coupling with enhanced green fluorescent protein. Viruses (2020) 12:224. doi: 10.3390/v12020224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ryabov EV, Christmon K, Heerman MC, Posada-Florez F, Harrison RL, Chen Y, et al. Development of a honey bee RNA virus vector based on the genome of a deformed wing virus. Viruses (2020) 12:374. doi: 10.3390/v12040374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: deformed wing virus, antiviral protein, quasi-species, honeybee, virus subtype

Citation: Huang W-F (2023) Editorial: Obstacles, advantages, and recent progress in honey bee virus research. Front. Insect Sci. 3:878344. doi: 10.3389/finsc.2023.878344

Received: 17 February 2022; Accepted: 21 March 2023;
Published: 03 April 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Jay Daniel Evans, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States

Copyright © 2023 Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Wei-Fone Huang, d2ZodWFuZy5mYWZ1QG91dGxvb2suY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.