
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Alloimmunity and Transplantation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1581599
This article is part of the Research Topic Methods in Alloimmunity and Transplantation: 2025 View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Vascularized composite allotransplantation is successful in reconstruction of major defects of the upper extremity and face. Both rejection and vascular damage seriously endanger the outcome. The role of adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) in suppressing acute rejection of composite allotransplants and their short term protective effects on vessels remains widely unexplored. Methods: Systemic and local donor-derived ASCs (CD45-CD29+CD90+) versus FK-506 administration was evaluated for reversal of acute rejection and vascular alterations in fully mismatched rat hind-limb transplants. Results: ASC administration upon grade II rejection significantly delayed, but didn’t suppress progression to grade III rejection (7.6±1.0 days systemic, 7.1±1.1 days local vs. no cell therapy 2.9±1 days; p<0.01, n=38 animals). Pro-inflammatory cytokine blood levels significantly increased in controls from grade II to grade III rejection, while ASC significantly lowered levels for G-CSF, MIP-1α, MIP-3α, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-18, and Rantes (p<0.05). Local and systemic PKH-26-labelled ASCs homed to the allograft and reversed intragraft vascular alterations in arterioles of rejecting skin and muscle, similarly to FK-506 treated controls (p<0.01). Conclusions: Although systemic and local ASC therapy reduces progression of acute rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation, it is not able to revert rejection without additional immunosuppressive therapy. However, graft vasculitis during acute rejection is significantly reduced after cytotherapy.
Keywords: hand transplantation, face transplantation, Immunomodulation, rejection therapy, transplant vasculitis, vasculopathy
Received: 22 Feb 2025; Accepted: 01 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Schweizer, Kamat, Klein, Kollar, Waldner, Stoelzl, Lehner, Salemi, Bode, Eberli, Taddeo and Plock. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Riccardo Schweizer, Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.