SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1578069

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Therapeutic Approaches for Complex Cancers: Exploring New Strategies in Glioblastoma, Urogenital, and Bladder CancersView all 10 articles

Elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcomes in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Wenfeng  HuWenfeng Hu1Jinze  LiangJinze Liang1Huaichun  HuHuaichun Hu2Jie  FanJie Fan3Jin  LuoJin Luo3Xinwen  WangXinwen Wang3Peng  ZhouPeng Zhou1Xiaoyi  ZhangXiaoyi Zhang1Jie  ZhouJie Zhou3*
  • 1Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
  • 2XinGuo Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ganzhou, China
  • 3Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction:The prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains controversial despite numerous investigations.This study aimed to systematically evaluate the prognostic value of PLR in NMIBC.Materials and methods: An extensive systematic search was executed utilizing four major electronic databases:Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The prognostic significance of PLR was assessed using pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs.Forest plots were used to present data visualization and statistical summaries, illustrating the effects of individual studies and the reliability of the pooled results.Funnel plot analysis and Egger's test were employed to evaluate the potential presence of publication bias.Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the pooled findings. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. Results:Eleven retrospective studies encomprising 3,566 patients met the inclusion criteria. Elevated PLR notably correlated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=2.132, 95% CI: 1.146-3.967, p=0.017) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.732, 95% CI: 1.174-2.554, p=0.006). No statistically meaningful correlation emerged in cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR=1.218, 95% CI: 0.800-1.854, p=0.358) or overall survival (OS) (HR=1.350, 95% CI: 0.611-2.983, p=0.459). Publication bias was detected in RFS analyses (Egger's test, P=0.010). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled results were robust. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression identified geographic differences and patient characteristics as key sources of heterogeneity in RFS outcomes. Subgroup analysis indicated that geographic differences and sample size were potential sources of heterogeneity in PFS results.Discussion:This study comprehensively analyzed 11 studies and 3,566 NMIBC cases and found that elevated PLR was significantly associated with poorer RFS and PFS, suggesting that PLR can be used as a prognostic biomarker for the management of NMIBC. The prognostic value of PLR may be related to immune regulation and inflammatory response in the tumor microenvironment; nevertheless, further studies are needed to elucidate its mechanism and establish its clinical application.Conclusions:This study demonstrates that elevated PLR serves as an independent predictor of poor PFS and RFS in NMIBC patients. As a cost-effective biomarker, PLR shows promise in risk stratification and treatment planning. However, large-scale prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized cut-off values.

Keywords: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, prognosis, biomarker, Meta-analysis, Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Received: 17 Feb 2025; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hu, Liang, Hu, Fan, Luo, Wang, Zhou, Zhang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jie Zhou, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430061, Hubei Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.