SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. T Cell Biology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1577360

This article is part of the Research TopicEvolving Therapeutic Landscape of Bispecific Antibodies and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell TherapiesView all articles

Efficacy and safety of CD19 combined with CD22 or CD20 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for hematological malignancies

Provisionally accepted
Xiaoshuang  YuanXiaoshuang Yuan1Feiqing  WangFeiqing Wang2*Peng  ZhaoPeng Zhao1Bo  YangBo Yang2Xu  YangXu Yang2Ting  TianTing Tian1Bingbing  LiBingbing Li2Guangyang  LiuGuangyang Liu2Sanbin  WangSanbin Wang3Dongxin  TangDongxin Tang2Zhixu  HeZhixu He4Li  YanjuLi Yanju1Yang  LiuYang Liu2
  • 1Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
  • 3The 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China
  • 4Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: CD19 combined with CD22 or CD20 therapy is a promising immunotherapy approach for the treatment of hematological malignancies.Dual-targeted CD19/CD22 CAR T and CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy are currently being evaluated in clinical trials, and the extent of improvement using CD19 in combination with dual-targeted therapy has not yet been determined. To compare the differences between the two in the treatment of hematological tumors, this study summarized the available evidence. To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of CD19-combined CD22 and CD19-combined CD20 CAR T-cell therapy.Methods: Data from 13 clinical studies that included 628 patients with hematological malignancies were extracted and analyzed based on a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary efficacy outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, overall survival (OS) rate and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative response rate. The safety outcomes were cytokine release syndrome (CRS) rate and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) rate.Results: For CD19 combined with CD22 CAR T-cell therapy, the ORR was 83.7%;

Keywords: car-t, hematological malignancies, Chimeric Antigen Receptor, Immunotherapy, cancer therapy

Received: 15 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yuan, Wang, Zhao, Yang, Yang, Tian, Li, Liu, Wang, Tang, He, Yanju and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Feiqing Wang, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more