
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. T Cell Biology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1577360
This article is part of the Research TopicEvolving Therapeutic Landscape of Bispecific Antibodies and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell TherapiesView all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: CD19 combined with CD22 or CD20 therapy is a promising immunotherapy approach for the treatment of hematological malignancies.Dual-targeted CD19/CD22 CAR T and CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy are currently being evaluated in clinical trials, and the extent of improvement using CD19 in combination with dual-targeted therapy has not yet been determined. To compare the differences between the two in the treatment of hematological tumors, this study summarized the available evidence. To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of CD19-combined CD22 and CD19-combined CD20 CAR T-cell therapy.Methods: Data from 13 clinical studies that included 628 patients with hematological malignancies were extracted and analyzed based on a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary efficacy outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, overall survival (OS) rate and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative response rate. The safety outcomes were cytokine release syndrome (CRS) rate and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) rate.Results: For CD19 combined with CD22 CAR T-cell therapy, the ORR was 83.7%;
Keywords: car-t, hematological malignancies, Chimeric Antigen Receptor, Immunotherapy, cancer therapy
Received: 15 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yuan, Wang, Zhao, Yang, Yang, Tian, Li, Liu, Wang, Tang, He, Yanju and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Feiqing Wang, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.