ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Primary Immunodeficiencies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1576235

Real-world Evidence of the Effectiveness and Utilization of Subcutaneous C1INH Long-term Prophylaxis in Patients With HAE in Spain and Germany

Provisionally accepted
Marcus  MaurerMarcus Maurer1Stefan  CimbollekStefan Cimbollek2Maebh  KellyMaebh Kelly3Kyle  RodneyKyle Rodney4John  ElliottJohn Elliott4Eduardo  LoboguerreroEduardo Loboguerrero4Markus  MagerlMarkus Magerl1*
  • 1Angioedema Center of Reference and Excellence (ACARE), Institute of Allergology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 2Allergy Department, Angioedema Reference Center (CSUR), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
  • 3CSL Behring, Haywards Heath, United Kingdom
  • 4Adivo Associates, San Francisco, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) types 1/2 are rare genetic disorders leading to C1 inhibitor (C1INH) deficiency/dysfunction. Guidelines recommend long-term prophylaxis (LTP) to prevent HAE attacks. Subcutaneous (SC) C1INH replacement therapy is approved for LTP in patients with HAE (age indication varies between countries). There is little real-world data on the outcomes of patients who switch to C1INH SC in Europe, particularly those who switch from C1INH IV. This retrospective patient chart analysis captured real-world evidence of the effectiveness of C1INH SC LTP in patients with HAE in Germany (n=69) and Spain (n=37). The primary endpoint was change in annualized attack rate (AAR) in patients who used C1INH IV LTP during a 6-month baseline period and switched to C1INH SC LTP for ≥6 months. Switching to C1INH SC LTP from C1INH IV LTP was associated with a 73.2% reduction in AAR (n=48; P<0.001) compared to baseline. Emergency Room (ER) visits and rescue medication use were also significantly reduced after switching to C1INH SC LTP from C1INH IV LTP. A similar reduction in AAR (68.9%), ER visits (49.8%), and rescue medication use (61.9%) was observed in the overall population (n=105), regardless of treatment at baseline. Similar changes from baseline were seen in patients from Germany and Spain.

Keywords: hereditary angioedema, prophylaxis, C1INH, Real-world evidence, Long-term, Subcutaneous, switch

Received: 25 Feb 2025; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Maurer, Cimbollek, Kelly, Rodney, Elliott, Loboguerrero and Magerl. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Markus Magerl, Angioedema Center of Reference and Excellence (ACARE), Institute of Allergology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more