
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1570502
This article is part of the Research Topic Formation of Immunological Niches in Tumor Microenvironments: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential View all 20 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background and objective: This study aims to explore the relationship between melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) expression levels and clinical pathological parameters of melanoma, as well as its potential as a prognostic biomarker.: This retrospective study included 99 melanoma patients in our hospital from June 2017 to July 2023. MC1R expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry assays. Histochemistry score (H-score) determined the level of MC1R immunohistochemistry expression in melanoma. The relationships among MC1R expression, clinical pathological parameters in melanoma patients were assessed using Chi-square and Fisher's precision probability tests. Kaplan-Meier assay and log-rank test were utilized to estimate survival curves. Potential independent factors among the enrolled patients were investigated using COX regression analysis. Results: According to median value of H-score, 38 cases with low MC1R expression and 61 cases with high MC1R expression in melanoma tumor tissues were observed. Patients with high MC1R expression in melanoma tissues exhibited a worse prognosis compared to patients with low MC1R expression. The survival time difference was statistically significant [MC1R expression in melanoma tumor tissue (MC1RT): median DFS, 12.83 vs. 17.53 months, χ2=5.395, P=0.0202; median OS, 16.47 vs. 21.77 months, χ2=5.082, P=0.0243. MC1R expression in normal adjacent to melanoma tissue (MC1RN): median DFS, 12.03 vs. 14.29 months, χ2=6.864, P=0.0088; median OS, 16.73 vs. 21.77 months, χ2=5.649, P=0.0175]. Multivariate COX regression model analysis indicated that MC1RN, MC1RT, sex, ESR, tumor site, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy were potential prognostic factors for the DFS. Furthermore, MC1RN, MC1RT, sex, tumor site, TLN, PLN, and immunotherapy were potential prognostic factors for the OS. Calibration curve indicated the predicted probabilities of nomogram models were in accordance with the actual probabilities, and the prediction accuracy was relatively high at one year and three years following surgery. The decision clinical curve revealed that the nomogram models had better predictive performance for DFS and OS than the MC1RT or MC1RN thresholds. Conclusions: Low MC1R expression in melanoma tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissue might be beneficial for the prognosis of melanoma patients. MC1R was a predictive factor for the prognosis of melanoma patients. Nomogram models based on MC1R demonstrated good prediction ability.
Keywords: Melanoma, Mc1r, Tumor site, Immunotherapy, Prognosis TBIL, Total bilirubin, DBIL, direct bilirubin, TBA, Total bile acids, BUN, blood urea nitrogen
Received: 03 Feb 2025; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xiang, Li, Wang and Su. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tian Xiang, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
Dan-Ke Su, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.