
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1567116
This article is part of the Research TopicTowards the Rapid and Systematic Assessment of Vaccine TechnologiesView all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines highlighted the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in modern vaccinology, accelerating timelines from years to months.Nevertheless, the specific roles and effectiveness of AI in accelerating and enhancing vaccine research, development, distribution, and acceptance remain dispersed across various reviews, underscoring the need for a unified synthesis.We conducted an umbrella review to consolidate evidence on AI's contributions to vaccine discovery, optimization, clinical testing, supply-chain logistics, and public acceptance. Five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEE Xplore) were systematically searched up to January 2025 for systematic, scoping, narrative, and rapid reviews, as well as meta-analyses explicitly focusing on AI in vaccine contexts. Data extraction encompassed AI techniques, vaccine platforms, disease targets, regulatory issues, and ethical considerations. Quality assessments were performed using the ROBIS and AMSTAR 2 tools to evaluate risk of bias and methodological rigor.Twenty-seven reviews met the inclusion criteria, covering a spectrum of AI methods-machine learning, deep learning, generative models, and natural language processing-applied to mRNA, peptide-based, viral vector, and protein subunit vaccines targeting COVID-19, influenza, HIV, dengue, cancer, and other pathogens. AI-driven approaches shortened research timelines, particularly in epitope prediction and adaptive clinical trial designs, and showed promise in enhancing vaccine efficacy and safety through multi-omic data integration. Nonetheless, major concerns regarding data heterogeneity, algorithmic bias, regulatory uncertainty, and cold-chain logistics persist. Emerging AI-driven communication strategies and sentiment analysis tools offer potential for mitigating vaccine hesitancy, although long-term effectiveness on sustained public trust remains to be established.AI is poised to reshape vaccine development by expediting discovery, optimizing manufacturing, and improving public engagement. Realizing these benefits, however, demands robust regulatory frameworks, equitable data-sharing consortia, and ethical oversight to mitigate biases and safeguard privacy. Strategic investment in infrastructure, multidisciplinary collaboration, and transparent governance will be critical for translating AI-driven innovations into global immunization success and pandemic preparedness.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, machine learning, vaccine development, epitope prediction, Regulatory frameworks, public acceptance, Pandemic preparedness
Received: 26 Jan 2025; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 ElArab, May Alkhunaizi, Alhashem, Al Khatib, Bubsheet and Hassanein. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rabie Adel ElArab, Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsaa, Saudi Arabia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.