
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566878
This article is part of the Research Topic Harnessing Big Data for Precision Medicine: Revolutionizing Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies View all 32 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Typhoid vaccination is a key strategy for controlling typhoid disease, but vaccine safety remains a major challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of typhoid vaccines by analyzing adverse events (AEs) obtained from major pharmacovigilance databases, including Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).We analyzed the VAERS from January 2000 through December 2024 to identify typhoid vaccine safety signals and age variations. Using disproportionality (PRR, ROR) and regression models, we assessed how demographic factors influence adverse event occurrence.Results: A total of 8,393 AEs were analyzed. The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 15.2%, consistent across age groups. The onset of most AES is within a day of vaccination, and the onset is faster in younger people. The ratio of reports reveals signals of serious aes, such as "chills" and "myalgia," while non-serious events such as "diarrhea" and "hives" are reported at higher rates.This study provides a comprehensive assessment of typhoid vaccine safety, highlighting both common and rare AEs. The identification of severe reactions underscores the need for continued pharmacovigilance. These findings provide valuable information for vaccine safety monitoring and the development of tailored vaccination strategies, especially in high-risk populations.
Keywords: typhoid vaccine, adverse events, Pharmacovigilance, Signal detection, Proportional reporting ratio
Received: 26 Jan 2025; Accepted: 05 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Niu, Xie, Weng, Li, Wu, She, Dai and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yingbo Dai, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong Province, China
ruoyun Xie, Department of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, Fuzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.