ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566394

This article is part of the Research TopicNanomaterials Mediated Immunomodulation in Cancer: Current Perspective from Bench to ClinicView all articles

Immunomodulatory Effects of Intratumoral Cowpea Mosaic Virus and Calreticulin Nanoparticles in Canine Tumors: Early Results

Provisionally accepted
Akansha  SinghAkansha Singh1Jessica  Fernanda Affonso De OliveiraJessica Fernanda Affonso De Oliveira2Jessica  SchraderJessica Schrader3Deepan  KishoreDeepan Kishore3Vidhya  ChandrasekarVidhya Chandrasekar1Steven  FieringSteven Fiering4Nicole  SteinmetzNicole Steinmetz5Ashish  RanjanAshish Ranjan1*
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
  • 2Department of Nanoengineering, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
  • 3Neel Veterinary Hospital, Oklahoma City, United States
  • 4Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
  • 5Center for Nano Immuno Engineering, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Intratumoral immunotherapy delivers immune-modifying therapeutic agents directly into the tumor microenvironment (TME), stimulating both local and systemic immune responses. In this pilot study, we evaluated the immunomodulatory effects of cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV), which primarily activates innate immunity, and calreticulin nanoparticle (CRT-NP), which enhance immunostimulatory signals of immunogenic cell death in canine cancers. The study focused on their potential to induce local and systemic antitumor immune responses and achieve tumor control.Method: CPMV was obtained through the mechanical inoculation of Vigna unguiculata, while CRT-NP was generated using cationic liposomes loaded with a CRT-expressing plasmid. Nine canine patients with oral melanoma, soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), and mammary gland carcinoma received CPMV or CRT-NP via intratumoral route. CPMV and CRT-NP was administered weekly at three-five intratumoral locations. To evaluate antitumor immune responses, biopsies and blood samples were obtained prior to treatment and during follow-up visits, extending up to one week after the final treatment. Endpoints included serum cytokine analysis, tumor transcriptomics via NanoString, immune cell profiling in blood and tumor biopsies, and efficacy assessment using RECIST criteria. Result: CPMV exhibited an icosahedral shape (~30 nm), while CRT-NP were spherical (~300 nm). CPMV induced stable disease (SD) in two of three melanoma and STS patients, with partial response (PR) in the rest. CRT-NP induced SD in two of three patients, with one STS patient achieving partial remission. Post-treatment NanoString and flow cytometry analyses revealed a shift in the tumor microenvironment toward a more immunostimulatory state, marked by increased neutrophils and CD8+ T cells. CPMV, in particular, upregulated genes involved in antigen processing and immune activation while enhancing IFN+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations. CRT-NP reduced Tregs in the TME. Further, serum cytokine levels, such as MCP-1, GM-CSF, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7 and IL-18, correlated with tumor growth independent of various treatments. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CPMV and CRT-NP, which activate distinct immunologic pathways, safely modulate the TME contributing to disease stabilization in spontaneous canine cancers. These results support the need for larger-scale trials to address current limitations, differentiate tumor-agnostic versus treatment-specific effects, and evaluate long-term clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS).

Keywords: Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) nanoparticles, Calreticulin nanoparticle, Intratumoral immunotherapy, Melanoma, Sarcoma, Immunomodulation

Received: 24 Jan 2025; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Singh, Affonso De Oliveira, Schrader, Kishore, Chandrasekar, Fiering, Steinmetz and Ranjan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ashish Ranjan, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more