data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566195
This article is part of the Research Topic Harnessing Big Data for Precision Medicine: Revolutionizing Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies View all 27 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To develop a simple and practical model to predict the prognostic survival of non-smoking patients with lung adenocarcinoma by combining general pathological information with laboratory hematologic indicators. Methods: Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the variable indicators. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed based on the selected variables to compare survival outcomes between the high-and low-risk groups of non-smoking patients with lung adenocarcinoma and to validate the model's performance. Subsequently, a nomogram model was established to systematically evaluate the impact of selected variables on prognosis. Results: Data of non-smoking patients with lung adenocarcinoma from four hospitals were retrospectively collected. We enrolled 1,172 patients, this includes 372 external validation data. Multivariate analysis identified six significant variables (P < 0.05): tumor TNM stage, tumor size, white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte percentage, and hemoglobin level. We combined these six variables to build a model. The C-index of the training set is 0.811 (0.780-0.842), this value is 0.786 (0.737-0.835) in,test set and 0.810 (0.772-0.847) in validation set. The area under the curve (AUC) results of the predicted 3-years overall survival (OS) of the three data sets were 0.850, 0.819, and 0.860, respectively. These values for 5-years were 0.811, 0.771, and 0.849. Stratified analysis based on tumor staging showed that the model effectively distinguished outcomes (P < 0.0001). High-risk groups demonstrated significantly poorer prognosis compared to low-risk groups (P < 0.001).The prognostic model based on tumor TNM stage, tumor size, white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, lymphocyte percentage, and hemoglobin levels effectively predicted the prognosis of non-smoking patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Compared with the more studied blood markers at present, the indicators of our model do not need conversion, Our model provides a useful reference for personalized diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice.
Keywords: Non-smoking lung adenocarcinoma, proportional hazards model, general pathological information, nomogram, general pathological information,nomogram, Prognostic prediction
Received: 24 Jan 2025; Accepted: 26 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xiang, Hu, Xiao, Li, Liao, Li, ZHU, Liu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xiaoqin Liu, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China
Qiang Li, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.