Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Immunol. , 12 February 2025

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1559465

This article is part of the Research Topic Immunotherapy Resistance and Advancing Adaptive Cell Therapeutics View all 9 articles

Advancing biliary tract malignancy treatment: emerging frontiers in cell-based therapies

Jianyang Ao&#x;Jianyang AoMingtai Hu&#x;Mingtai HuJinghan Wang*Jinghan Wang*Xiaoqing Jiang*Xiaoqing Jiang*
  • Institute of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Biliary tract malignancies, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer, represent a group of aggressive cancers with poor prognosis due to late-stage diagnosis, limited treatment options, and resistance to conventional therapies like chemotherapy and radiotherapy. These challenges emphasize the urgent need for innovative therapeutic approaches. In recent years, cell-based therapies have emerged as a promising avenue, offering potential solutions through immune modulation, genetic engineering, and targeted intervention in the tumor microenvironment. This Mini-review provides an overview of current advancements in cell-based therapies for biliary malignancies, encompassing immune cell-based strategies such as CAR-T cells, NK cells, dendritic cell vaccines, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. We also examine strategies to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and discuss the integration of cell therapies into multimodal treatment regimens. By synthesizing preclinical and clinical findings, this review highlights key insights and future directions, aiming to assist researchers and clinicians in translating these approaches into effective treatments. The transformative potential of cell-based therapies discussed here makes this review a valuable resource for advancing biliary malignancy research and clinical applications.

1 Introduction

Biliary tract malignancies, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ECC), and gallbladder cancer (GBC), rank among the most lethal cancers, with dismal five-year survival rates and limited progress in improving outcomes over the past decades (13). The incidence of biliary tract cancer varies by region, with cholangiocarcinoma having a low incidence in high-income countries (0.35 to 2 cases per 100,000 annually) and much higher rates in endemic areas like Thailand and China, where it can be up to 40 times higher. For patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, survival remains poor, with median overall survival ranging from 2.5 to 4.5 months, as shown in randomized controlled trials (1). Biliary tract malignancies often present asymptomatically in early stages, leading to late-stage diagnoses where curative surgical options are no longer feasible. Moreover, biliary tumors are inherently resistant to conventional therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which are further hampered by the tumor’s dense stromal barrier and immunosuppressive microenvironment (4). The standard treatment regimens for biliary malignancies, including Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or Cisplatin and Gemcitabine combinations, provide only modest survival benefits and are frequently associated with significant toxicity (5). Targeted therapies aimed at genetic alterations such as FGFR2 fusions, IDH1 mutations (6), and HER2 overexpression have shown promise in a subset of patients but remain far from curative (79). Immunotherapy, a breakthrough in treating other cancers, has faced significant challenges in biliary malignancies due to the highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) (10, 11), characterized by regulatory T cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs).

Cell-based therapies have emerged as a revolutionary approach, leveraging the body’s immune system or engineered cellular systems to combat malignancies (12, 13). Unlike conventional treatments, these therapies are designed to specifically target tumor cells, potentially overcoming the limitations of the TME and achieving durable responses. Among the most promising strategies are chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, which have demonstrated success in hematological cancers and are now being adapted for solid tumors like biliary malignancies (14, 15). Natural killer (NK) cell therapies and dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines are also being explored for their potential to activate innate and adaptive immune responses against these tumors (16, 17). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), another emerging avenue, exploit the natural immune infiltration of tumors to enhance therapeutic outcomes (18).

Recent advancements in genetic engineering and synthetic biology, have significantly improved the precision and efficacy of cell-based therapies (19). These technologies allow for the modification of immune cells to enhance their tumor-targeting capabilities while minimizing off-target effects. Additionally, efforts to modulate the TME—such as targeting desmoplasia, reprogramming stromal components, and reducing immunosuppressive cytokines—are creating a more favorable environment for therapeutic cells to function effectively (20). This review explores the rapidly evolving landscape of cell-based therapies for biliary malignancies. By synthesizing insights from preclinical studies and clinical trials, we aim to highlight key challenges and opportunities, providing a comprehensive perspective on how cell-based strategies may redefine treatment paradigms for these challenging cancers.

2 Immune cell-based therapies

2.1 CAR-T cell therapy

CAR-T cell therapy has emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic strategy for biliary malignancies. By engineering T cells to express CARs that specifically target tumor-associated antigens, CAR-T cells overcome the limitations of conventional therapies. In biliary cancers, targets such as mesothelin, HER2, and EGFR have been identified as promising candidates for CAR-T cell therapy. Mesothelin, frequently overexpressed in biliary cancers, is implicated in tumor progression through its role in cell adhesion, migration, and immune evasion (21). By interacting with MUC16, mesothelin promotes metastasis and suppresses immune responses, contributing to therapy resistance. Overexpression of mesothelin predicts malignant progression of cholangiocarcinoma (22). CAR-T cells targeting mesothelin have shown potential in reducing tumor burden, though their success has been hindered by the highly immunosuppressive TME and off-target toxicity. Mechanistically, mesothelin CAR-T cells secreting anti-CD3 molecules efficiently targeting pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer (23, 24). The affinity-tuned mesothelin CAR-T cells indicate the potentiated targeting specificity and reduced off-tumor toxicity (25). Moreover, gallbladder cancer tumors frequently express carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),CEA-specific CAR-T cells effectively recognize and respond to CEA, even in the presence of immune-suppressive factors like PD-L1. CAR-T cells showed strong activation, cytokine production (IFN-γ, TNF-α), and cytotoxicity, reducing tumor growth in vitro and in vivo in gallbladder cancer (26). In addition, chronic cholangitis is a significant risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma due to prolonged inflammation and bile duct damage. PD-1-targeting CAR-T cells effectively treat autoimmune cholangitis by selectively depleting pathogenic CD8+ tissue-resident memory T (Trm) cells in the liver, which alleviates biliary immunopathology and highlights the therapeutic potential of CAR-T cell therapy biliary cholangitis (27). Recent research has indicated that EGFR and B7H3 antigens are highly expressed in biliary tract cancer, EGFR-CAR-T and B7H3-CAR-T cells demonstrated specific anti-tumor activity (28). Similarly, HER2, a receptor tyrosine kinase overexpressed in a subset of biliary cancers, drives oncogenic signaling through pathways like PI3K/AKT and MAPK (29). These pathways enhance tumor cell proliferation, survival, and resistance to therapies, including chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. HER2 is overexpressed in a subset of biliary cancers, is being explored as a target, with clinical trials evaluating its therapeutic potential by pertuzumab and trastuzumab (30, 31), and Zanidatamab (32). HER2- targeting CAR-T cells has been successful in pre-clinical research in glioblastoma (33), gastric cancer (34), ovarian cancer (35), breast cancer (36), and in clinical trial for targeting sarcoma (37). Therefore, CAR-T cells targeting HER2 will probably have promising result for biliary malignancies (Figure 1). Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the clinical use of CAR T-cell therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Further clinical trials are essential to establish its safety and efficacy for routine clinical application. Notably, the safety and effectiveness of MUC-1 CAR T cells are being evaluated in a Phase I/II clinical trial in China for patients with ICC (NCT03633773) (38).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Overview of CAR-T cell therapy targeting biliary tract cancer. This figure illustrates the development and application of CAR-T cell therapy for biliary tract cancer. The upper panel highlights the immunosuppressive TME characteristic of biliary tract cancers, which hinders immune response. CAR-T cells, engineered with antigen-specific receptors, are shown to recognize and bind to cancer cells, leading to the release of cytokines and subsequent tumor cell death. The lower panel details the design and validation process of CAR-T cells. Antigens such as HER2, EGFR, MUC1, MUC16, mesothelin, and PD-L1, commonly overexpressed in biliary tract cancers, are selected as targets for CAR-T design. These CAR-T cells are tested for efficacy and safety through in vitro and in vivo experiments, including animal models, to ensure their therapeutic potential.

Despite encouraging preclinical results, CAR-T cell therapy faces significant challenges in biliary malignancies. The dense stromal barrier, composed of CAFs and extracellular matrix components, impedes CAR-T cell infiltration. Additionally, the immunosuppressive TME, characterized by Tregs and MDSCs, further limits efficacy. Moreover, the high expression of immune checkpoint molecules like PD-L1 within the TME suppresses CAR-T cell function, contributing to treatment resistance (39). through knock down immune checkpoints and immunosuppressive molecular receptors. Strategies to overcome these barriers include combining CAR-T therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and modulating the TME using stromal-targeting agents or cytokines.

2.2 Natural killer cell therapy

NK cells, integral to the innate immune system, possess unique advantages over T cells in cancer therapy, including their ability to target tumor cells without prior antigen sensitization. NK cell-based therapies for biliary malignancies encompass allogeneic NK cells, cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells, and engineered NK cells. Allogeneic NK cells derived from healthy donors offer an off-the-shelf therapeutic option. Preclinical models of biliary cancers have demonstrated their efficacy, particularly when combined with cytokines like IL-2 or IL-15 to enhance their cytotoxic activity. Engineered NK cells, modified to express CARs or other tumor-specific receptors, represent an exciting avenue for enhancing specificity and potency.

Targeting PD-1 in cholangiocarcinoma by nanovesicle-based immunotherapy has exhibited good result in mouse modal (40). The biliary epithelium presents antigens to activate NK cells and NK T cells (41). Checkpoint inhibitors have shown synergistic effects when combined with NK cell therapies. By alleviating inhibitory signals within the TME, these combinations restore NK cell functionality and improve therapeutic outcomes. Current clinical trials are exploring the integration of NK cell therapies with checkpoint inhibitors in biliary malignancies.

2.3 Dendritic cell -based vaccines

DCs, as potent antigen-presenting cells, play a pivotal role in initiating robust T cell responses (42). DC-based vaccines, designed to present tumor-specific antigens, have shown promise in biliary malignancies (17, 43). Personalized DC vaccines using neoantigens derived from individual tumors are at the forefront of this approach.

Clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of DC-based vaccines in melanoma-associated antigen (MAGE)-positive gallbladder carcinoma (44). For example, vaccines loaded with peptides from commonly mutated genes, such as KRAS (45), or tumor lysates have induced tumor-specific immune responses. Combining DC vaccines with immune checkpoint blockade has further enhanced efficacy by enabling sustained T cell activation and memory formation.

The success of vaccination depends on both the immune system’s capabilities and the choice of an appropriate target antigen. Ideally, the target should be tumor-specific and conserved within the cancer cells to minimize collateral damage to healthy tissues and reduce the risk of antigen-negative tumor cells that might evade immune detection. Wilm’s Tumor protein 1 (WT1), a transcription factor that plays a role in urogenital development and tumor suppression, is a prime candidate for cancer immunotherapy (46). WT1 interacts with various growth factor receptors and regulatory proteins, such as PDGF-R, EGFR, c-MYC, and Bcl-2 (47). WT1 mutations are present in 68%-80% of biliary tract cancers, and while the clinical relevance in biliary tract cancer is still under investigation, similar mutations have been associated with poor prognosis in other cancers like testicular, breast, and head and neck cancers (48). Another promising antigen is Mucin 1 (MUC1) (46), a heavily glycosylated glycoprotein found on the surface of many tumor cells. MUC1 helps form a protective barrier around tumors, preventing the penetration of chemotherapy and immune cells. Overexpression of MUC1 is observed in 90% of gallbladder carcinoma cases and 59%-77% of cholangiocarcinoma cases, often correlating with more advanced disease and poor overall survival (49). The effectiveness of peptide-based vaccines can be limited by the tumor heterogeneity within cancers like biliary cancer. Although antigens such as WT1 and MUC1 are often overexpressed in biliary tumors, their distribution is not uniform. Some cancer cells may lack these antigens entirely, or express them at low levels. Additionally, individual variations in immune response, even among patients with similar HLA types, can affect the success of these vaccines. This is due, in part, to differences in the number of lymphocytes that are sensitive to these specific antigens. Approaches to improve efficacy include incorporating adjuvants like Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists and leveraging advanced delivery platforms, such as nanoparticles, to enhance antigen presentation and immune activation.

2.4 Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

TILs represent a highly promising approach to harness the body’s natural immune response against biliary malignancies (18, 50). These immune cells, which naturally migrate into tumor tissues, can be isolated and expanded from patient tumor specimens, generating autologous T cell products capable of recognizing and targeting tumor-associated antigens. Preclinical research has demonstrated the potential of TIL therapy to mediate tumor regression in models of biliary tract cancer (51, 52). In these studies, TILs were shown to infiltrate the TME, attack cancer cells, and lead to significant tumor reduction (53, 54). These results underscore the promise of TIL-based therapies in targeting cancers that are traditionally resistant to standard treatments. The combination of TIL together with other therapies often include cytokines such as interleukin-2 (IL-2), which can enhance TIL persistence and function, or immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-PD-1/PD-L1), which may reverse immune suppression within the TME and enhance TIL survival and effectiveness. The aim of these combination therapies is to improve the persistence and functionality of TILs in the immunosuppressive and hostile TME often found in biliary tract cancer.

One of the major challenges in TIL therapy for biliary tract cancer is the difficulty in obtaining sufficient TILs from tumor tissues (55). Biliary tumors often exhibit low immunogenicity, which means that fewer T cells are naturally infiltrating the tumor (56, 57). This, combined with the immunosuppressive environment present in the TME, limits the availability and effectiveness of TILs. As a result, strategies to improve TIL efficacy have focused on several key areas: (1) preconditioning regimens: These involve manipulating the TME before TIL infusion to reduce the presence of immunosuppressive cells such as Tregs and MDSCs. By depleting these cells, TILs are more likely to survive and function effectively. (2) Genetic modifications: enhancements such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and TCR modifications have been used to increase TIL survival, improve their cytotoxic potential, and enhance their resistance to the hostile TME. CAR-T cells, for example, can be engineered to specifically target tumor antigens present on cancer cells (58). (3) Combination therapies: clinical trials exploring combinations of TIL therapy with cytokines and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promise in improving outcomes (59). These combinations aim to create a more favorable TME, enhancing TIL expansion, persistence, and tumor-killing capacity.

While TIL-based therapies for biliary tract cancer remain in their infancy, the ongoing research and pre-clinical research hold great potential for improving outcomes with this difficult-to-treat cancer. The ability to harness and enhance the immune system through TIL therapy may represent a major breakthrough in addressing the immune escape mechanisms that often render traditional therapies ineffective in biliary tract cancer. Continued advancements in understanding the biology of TILs, the challenges of the TME, and the development of personalized approaches will be essential to maximize the therapeutic potential of TILs in biliary cancers.

3 Other immunotherapies targeting biliary tract malignancies

3.1 Targeting immune checkpoints

Immune checkpoint expression plays a critical role in cholangiocarcinoma and is strongly associated with poor prognosis. PD-L1 is expressed in 49–94% of biliary tract cancer cases, and its presence correlates with worse survival outcomes, including a 60% reduction in survival for patients with high PD-L1 expression at the tumor front (60, 61). PD-1 and PD-L1 upregulation have been observed in biliary tract cancer subtypes, such as ECC and ICC, where they are linked to decreased CD8+ T-cell infiltration, poorer overall survival, and increased metastasis (62). Elevated soluble PD-L1 levels in the serum of advanced biliary cancer patients further predict worse survival. Other checkpoints, such as B7-H4 and FOXP3, are associated with poor prognosis, while CTLA-4 expression in certain biliary tract cancer subtypes has shown mixed outcomes, including improved disease-free intervals in hilar biliary tract cancer (63). Gene expression studies indicate that hypermutated biliary tract cancer tumors frequently exhibit increased checkpoint molecule expression, such as CTLA-4, PD-L1, and LAG3, actively suppressing the immune response (64, 65). These findings underscore the potential of targeting immune checkpoints, particularly PD-1/PD-L1, as a therapeutic strategy for biliary tract cancer, providing a foundation for ongoing clinical trials to evaluate their efficacy and safety.

3.2 Synthetic approaches

Synthetic biology has paved the way for designing immune cells with enhanced therapeutic capabilities. By incorporating synthetic genetic circuits, researchers create “smart” immune cells that precisely target tumors while minimizing off-target effects. One such innovation involves the use of AND-gate circuits, which require the presence of multiple tumor-associated antigens to activate the therapeutic response, thus improving specificity in targeting biliary tumors (66, 67). Safety switches represent another critical advancement in synthetic biology. These switches, often based on inducible suicide genes, allow clinicians to terminate cell therapy in case of severe adverse effects. For instance, synthetic circuits incorporating small-molecule-inducible caspase systems rapidly eliminate engineered cells in response to toxicity, ensuring patient safety (68).

Synthetic biology has also enabled the development of “armored” CAR-T cells, which are engineered to secrete cytokines such as IL-12 within the TME. These cytokines boost local immune activation and counteract immunosuppressive signals, amplifying the therapeutic impact on biliary malignancies. CAFs in the TME inhibit T cell infiltration and induce dysfunction, while the limited availability of tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) and expression of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) on normal tissues can cause “on-target, off-tumor” toxicity. A TALEN-based strategy to engineer allogeneic “Smart CAR T cells” were developed (66). These cells express a CAR targeting FAP+ CAFs in solid tumors and a second CAR, directed at a TAA like mesothelin, integrated into a TCR signaling-inducible locus such as PDCD1 (66). A library of multi-receptor cell-cell recognition circuits was created using synthetic Notch receptors to link multiple molecular recognition events. These circuits enable engineered T cells to recognize both extracellular and intracellular antigens, showing robustness to heterogeneity and achieving precise recognition of up to three antigens with positive or negative logic (69). Additionally, synthetic biology approaches are being employed to design NK cells with enhanced migratory and cytotoxic properties, expanding their potential applications in treating solid tumors like biliary cancers (70).

Preclinical and early clinical studies are beginning to demonstrate the potential of combining ICIs with cell-based therapies in biliary tract cancer. For example, CAR-T cells targeting PD-L1 or other tumor-specific antigens could directly lyse tumor cells while benefiting from the additional immune activation provided by ICIs. Similarly, ICIs can enhance the persistence and function of adoptively transferred TILs or NK cells, improving their efficacy against biliary tract cancer. Despite these advances, challenges remain, including the heterogeneity of biliary cancers, the complexity of the TME, and potential toxicities from combining immune-based therapies. Strategies such as optimizing antigen selection for cell therapies, using novel immune checkpoint targets, and leveraging biomarkers to stratify patients will be crucial to maximizing the benefits of these combinations.

4 Modulating the tumor microenvironment in biliary tract cancers

Biliary malignancies are characterized by a unique and challenging TME that presents significant barriers to effective therapy. The TME of these tumors is composed of a dense extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, and various immunosuppressive elements, which not only limit the delivery of therapeutic agents but also actively support tumor progression and immune evasion. TME reprogramming by the combination of chemotherapy and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint block enhances anti-PD-1 therapy (71).

4.1 Cancer-associated fibroblasts and stroma cells confer immuno-suppressive TME

A defining feature of biliary cancers is their pronounced desmoplastic reaction, marked by extensive fibrosis and the accumulation of CAFs (72). CAFs secrete ECM components, such as collagen, hyaluronan, and fibronectin, creating a physical barrier that restricts the infiltration of therapeutic immune cells, including CAR-T cells, NK cells, and TILs (73). Moreover, CAFs produce immunosuppressive cytokines like transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), which inhibit the activity of cytotoxic T cells and NK cells, while promoting the recruitment of Tregs and MDSCs (74, 75). CAF promoted cholangiocarcinoma growth by secreting hyaluronan synthase 2 instead of type 1 collagen (76). In addition, Stromal cells also contribute to metabolic reprogramming within the TME, depriving immune cells of vital nutrients like glucose and amino acids, while enriching the environment with immunosuppressive metabolites such as adenosine and lactate (77). These factors create a hostile microenvironment for immune cell therapies, necessitating strategies to target stromal components directly.

4.2 Approaches to reprogram the TME

4.2.1 Stromal cell targeting

One promising approach involves directly targeting CAFs to disrupt their tumor-supportive roles. Agents such as fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-specific inhibitors have demonstrated preclinical efficacy in depleting CAF populations, resulting in reduced fibrosis and enhanced immune cell infiltration. Additionally, efforts are underway to reprogram CAFs into a tumor-restraining phenotype using agents like vitamin D analogs, which have the potential to convert activated CAFs into a quiescent state.

4.2.2 Enzyme-based desmoplasia modulation

Another strategy focuses on enzymatic degradation of the ECM to improve immune cell penetration. Enzyme-based desmoplasia modulation aims to degrade or remodel the ECM, reduce stromal density, and enhance the accessibility of therapeutic agents. The following enzymes have shown potential in biliary tract tumor models: (1)Hyaluronidase: Hyaluronidase degrades hyaluronic acid, a major component of the ECM that contributes to elevated interstitial fluid pressure (78). By breaking down hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase reduces tumor stiffness, improves vascular perfusion, and facilitates the delivery of chemotherapeutics and immune cells. PEGPH20, a pegylated form of hyaluronidase, has shown the ability to degrade hyaluronan, a major ECM component, thereby facilitating the delivery of immune and chemotherapeutic agents (79). In preclinical models of biliary cancers, PEGPH20 has been shown to synergize with CAR-T cell therapy, enhancing T cell infiltration and efficacy (80). More of its roles have been studied in pancreatic cancer (81). They also enhance the efficacy of gemcitabine and other systemic therapies in desmoplastic tumors (82). (2) Collagenase: Collagenase targets collagen, the most abundant structural protein in the ECM, thereby weakening the fibrotic barrier (83). Collagenase treatment has been shown to improve T cell infiltration in desmoplastic tumors, making it a promising adjunct to immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or CAR-T cells. (3) Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs): MMPs are endogenous enzymes capable of degrading various ECM components. Recombinant MMPs or MMP-inducing strategies have been explored to modulate the TME and enhance the penetration of therapeutic agents. MMP2 induces COL1A1 synthesis by integrin alpha V to promote cholangiocarcinoma metastasis (84). A selective NOTCH1 inhibitor Crenigacestat reduces ICC progression by blocking VEGFA/DLL4/MMP13 axis (85). By breaking down the desmoplastic stroma, Enzyme-based modulation improve drug delivery, alleviate hypoxia, and promote immune cell infiltration. Additionally, combining enzyme therapy with chemotherapy or immunotherapy may achieve synergistic effects, enhancing overall efficacy. However, challenges remain. The nonspecific activity of enzymes leads to off-target effects and toxicity in normal tissues. Moreover, the dynamic nature of the TME means that stromal remodeling must be carefully timed and dosed to avoid adverse effects, such as tumor promotion due to excessive ECM degradation.

4.2.3 Immunomodulatory agents

TGF-β inhibitors reverse T cell exhaustion and reprogram the TME by alleviating fibrosis and immune suppression, making these inhibitors especially relevant for cholangiocarcinoma and other biliary tract cancers. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase(IDO) inhibitors, which block the enzyme responsible for depleting tryptophan and suppressing T cell activity, are being tested in combination with NK cell therapies to enhance immune effector functions in these tumors (86, 87). Additionally, targeting adenosine signaling using A2A receptor antagonists helps counteract the immunosuppressive effects of adenosine, a metabolite enriched in the hypoxic and nutrient-deprived TME of biliary tumors (88). These strategies address the unique challenges of biliary tract cancers, where immune evasion and stromal barriers limit the efficacy of current treatments, offering new hope for improving therapeutic outcomes through combination approaches.

4.3 Combining cell-based therapies with TME modulators

Integrating cell-based therapies with TME-modulating agents has demonstrated potential in overcoming the challenges presented by the TME in biliary malignancies. For example, the combination of PEGPH20 and immune checkpoint inhibition has shown enhanced tumor regression in preclinical models of colon cancer (89). Similarly, using CAF-targeting agents alongside NK cell therapy has improved NK cell infiltration and cytotoxicity (90). Innovative approaches involving dual-function engineered cells are also under investigation. For example, CAR-T cells engineered to secrete ECM-degrading enzymes or immunostimulatory cytokines could simultaneously target tumor cells and modulate the TME (91). Additionally, NK cells equipped with synthetic receptors targeting stromal components like FAP or integrins may selectively disrupt the tumor stroma while maintaining anti-tumor activity, offering a promising strategy for tackling the complex TME of biliary malignancies (92).

5 Conclusions and perspectives

Recent advancements in cell-based therapies have introduced promising avenues for the treatment of biliary tract cancers. Immune cell-based strategies, including CAR-T cells, NK cells, and dendritic cell vaccines, alongside innovative genetic engineering techniques and synthetic biology, offer significant potential in addressing the challenges posed by these aggressive malignancies (Figure 2). However, the application of these therapies is still hindered by several critical challenges that must be addressed to improve their clinical utility. One major hurdle is the immunosuppressive TME in biliary tract cancers, which limits the efficacy of cell-based therapies by suppressing anti-tumor immune responses. Additionally, safety concerns such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and off-target effects present significant barriers to broader clinical application. CRS, a frequent complication in CAR-T therapy, results from excessive immune activation and can lead to life-threatening systemic inflammation. To address this, mitigation strategies such as the use of IL-6 receptor antagonists (e.g., tocilizumab), corticosteroids, and dose titration protocols have been developed. Off-target effects, caused by the unintended targeting of healthy tissues due to shared antigen expression, further complicate treatment. Advanced strategies, including dual-antigen targeting systems, tumor-restricted promoters, and engineered safety switches, are being explored to enhance therapeutic precision and minimize collateral damage. Furthermore, optimizing manufacturing processes and integrating emerging technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9 and synthetic biology, are critical steps to enhance both the efficacy and safety of these therapies. Collectively, overcoming these challenges will be essential to unlocking the full potential of cell-based therapies and improving outcomes for patients with biliary malignancies. Current main open questions in targeting biliary tract cancer by cell therapy are as below:

● How to effectively overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to enhance the efficacy of cell-based therapies for biliary tract cancers?

● What are the next critical steps in optimizing the manufacturing processes of cell-based therapies to ensure their scalability and accessibility for a broader patient population?

● In what ways can the integration of immune-modulating agents with cell-based therapies potentially synergize to improve treatment outcomes in biliary tract cancers?

● How might advancements in genetic engineering techniques and synthetic biology further enhance the precision and effectiveness of personalized cell therapies for individual patients with advanced biliary cancers?

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Targeting biliary tract cancer by cell-based therapies and combined therapies.

The immune cell-based therapies section highlights approach such as CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells, dendritic cell vaccines, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which aim to harness or engineer immune cells to combat cancer. The modulation of the tumor microenvironment includes targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), stromal cells, and using enzyme-based desmoplasia modulation or immunomodulatory agents to overcome the immunosuppressive environment. Combined therapies integrate cell therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chemotherapy, or biologically engineered therapies to enhance efficacy. These approaches aim to overcome the challenges of biliary tract cancer by improving immune recognition, tumor microenvironment remodeling, and therapeutic synergy.

The future of biliary tract cancer treatment lies in continued innovation and cross-disciplinary collaboration. By combining cell-based therapies with immune-modulating agents, advanced genetic tools, and personalized treatment strategies, there is a tangible potential to significantly improve outcomes for patients with biliary tract cancers. As research progresses, the clinical translation of these therapies will mark a transformative step in combating these challenging malignancies, offering renewed hope to patients who currently have limited effective treatment options.

To further advance biliary tract cancer treatment, several key research directions need to be explored. First, identifying and validating novel tumor-associated antigens is crucial. By leveraging high-throughput screening and bioinformatics approaches, researchers can uncover new targets for immunotherapy, potentially improving the specificity and efficacy of treatments. Second, enhancing delivery systems is essential to ensure the precise targeting of therapies to tumor sites. Developing advanced systems, such as nanoparticles or viral vectors, could significantly improve the efficiency and precision of cell-based treatments. Lastly, addressing the heterogeneity of TME is vital for overcoming resistance to therapies. The TME’s immunosuppressive nature hinders effective treatment; thus, targeting TME components like tumor-associated macrophages or regulatory T cells could help overcome these barriers and potentiate the effects of immunotherapies. By focusing on these research avenues, the therapeutic landscape for BTC can be dramatically improved, leading to more effective, personalized treatment options and better outcomes for patients.

Author contributions

JW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JA: Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MH: Resources, Writing – review & editing. XJ: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Scientific Research Project of Pudong New Area Science and Economic Commission (PKJ2022-Y18), Key Discipline Construction Project Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai (PWZxk2022-02), Academic Leaders Training Program of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai (PWRd2022-05).

Acknowledgments

All the figures were generated via BioRenders, https://BioRender.com.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

CAFs, cancer-associated fibroblasts; CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; CIK, cytokine-induced killer; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; CR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T cells; DC, dendritic cell; ECC, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; ECM, extracellular matrix; GBC, gallbladder cancer; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; IDO, Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; IL-2, interleukin-2; MAGE, melanoma-associated antigen; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; MMPs, Matrix metalloproteinases; MUC1, Mucin 1; NK, Natural killer; TAAs, tumor-associated antigens; TILs, Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TME, tumor microenvironment; Tregs, regulatory T cells; Trm, tissue-resident memory T; TSAs, tumor-specific antigens; WT1, Wilm’s Tumor protein 1.

References

1. Valle JW, Kelley RK, Nervi B, Oh DY, Zhu AX. Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. (2021) 397:428–44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00153-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Harding JJ, Khalil DN, Fabris L, Abou-Alfa GK. Rational development of combination therapies for biliary tract cancers. J Hepatol. (2023) 78:217–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.09.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Roa JC, Garcia P, Kapoor VK, Maithel SK, Javle M, Koshiol J. Gallbladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2022) 8:69. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00398-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Vogel A, Segatto O, Stenzinger A, Saborowski A. FGFR2 inhibition in cholangiocarcinoma. Annu Rev Med. (2023) 74:293–306. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042921-024707

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, Finn RS, Furuse J, Ren Z, et al. Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. (2023) 401:1853–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Makawita S, Lee S, Kong E, Kwong LN, Abouelfetouh Z, Danner De Armas A, et al. Comprehensive immunogenomic profiling of IDH1-/2-altered cholangiocarcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol. (2024) 8:e2300544. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00544

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lamarca A, Barriuso J, McNamara MG, Valle JW. Molecular targeted therapies: Ready for “prime time” in biliary tract cancer. J Hepatol. (2020) 73:170–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kam AE, Masood A, Shroff RT. Current and emerging therapies for advanced biliary tract cancers. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) 6:956–69. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00171-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ho J, Fiocco C, Spencer K. Treating biliary tract cancers: new targets and therapies. Drugs. (2022) 82:1629–47. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01808-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Zhang Y, Zuo C, Liu L, Hu Y, Yang B, Qiu S, et al. Single-cell RNA-sequencing atlas reveals an MDK-dependent immunosuppressive environment in ErbB pathway-mutated gallbladder cancer. J Hepatol. (2021) 75:1128–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. He H, Chen S, Yu Y, Fan Z, Qian Y, Dong Y, et al. Comprehensive single-cell analysis deciphered microenvironmental dynamics and immune regulator olfactomedin 4 in pathogenesis of gallbladder cancer. Gut. (2024) 73:1529–42. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331773

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chancellor D, Barrett D, Nguyen-Jatkoe L, Millington S, Eckhardt F. The state of cell and gene therapy in 2023. Mol Ther. (2023) 31:3376–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.11.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Rouce RH, Porteus MH. Cell and gene therapy accessibility. Science. (2024) 385:475. doi: 10.1126/science.ads0252

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Drougkas K, Karampinos K, Karavolias I, Gomatou G, Koumprentziotis IA, Ploumaki I, et al. CAR-T cell therapy in pancreatic and biliary tract cancers: an updated review of clinical trials. J Gastrointest Cancer. (2024) 55:990–1003. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01054-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Tang L, Pan S, Wei X, Xu X, Wei Q. Arming CAR-T cells with cytokines and more: Innovations in the fourth-generation CAR-T development. Mol Ther. (2023) 31:3146–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.09.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Myers JA, Miller JS. Exploring the NK cell platform for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2021) 18:85–100. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0426-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sabado RL, Balan S, Bhardwaj N. Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy. Cell Res. (2017) 27:74–95. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Paijens ST, Vledder A, de Bruyn M, Nijman HW. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the immunotherapy era. Cell Mol Immunol. (2021) 18:842–59. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00565-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wang SW, Gao C, Zheng YM, Yi L, Lu JC, Huang XY, et al. Current applications and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in cancer. Mol Cancer. (2022) 21:57. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01518-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Xiao Y, Yu D. Tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. (2021) 221:107753. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107753

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mandrekar P, Cardinale V. Periostin and mesothelin: Potential predictors of Malignant progression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatol Commun. (2018) 2:481–3. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1189

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Manzanares MA, Campbell DJW, Maldonado GT, Sirica AE. Overexpression of periostin and distinct mesothelin forms predict Malignant progression in a rat cholangiocarcinoma model. Hepatol Commun. (2018) 2:155–72. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1131

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Wehrli M, Guinn S, Birocchi F, Kuo A, Sun Y, Larson RC, et al. Mesothelin CAR T cells secreting anti-FAP/anti-CD3 molecules efficiently target pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its stroma. Clin Cancer Res. (2024) 30:1859–77. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3841

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chen J, Hu J, Gu L, Ji F, Zhang F, Zhang M, et al. Anti-mesothelin CAR-T immunotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2023) 72:409–25. doi: 10.1007/s00262-022-03238-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Yang Y, Vedvyas Y, Alcaina Y, Trumper SJ, Babu DS, Min IM, et al. Affinity-tuned mesothelin CAR T cells demonstrate enhanced targeting specificity and reduced off-tumor toxicity. JCI Insight. (2024) 9(22):e186268. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.186268

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lopez E, Hidalgo S, Roa E, Gomez J, Hermansen Truan C, Sanders E, et al. Preclinical evaluation of chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting the carcinoembryonic antigen as a potential immunotherapy for gallbladder cancer. Oncoimmunology. (2023) 12:2225291. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2023.2225291

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zhu HX, Yang SH, Gao CY, Bian ZH, Chen XM, Huang RR, et al. Targeting pathogenic CD8(+) tissue-resident T cells with chimeric antigen receptor therapy in murine autoimmune cholangitis. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:2936. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46654-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Qiao Y, Chen J, Wang X, Yan S, Tan J, Xia B, et al. Enhancement of CAR-T cell activity against cholangiocarcinoma by simultaneous knockdown of six inhibitory membrane proteins. Cancer Commun (Lond). (2023) 43:788–807. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12452

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Rizzo A, Ricci AD, Bonucci C, Tober N, Palloni A, Frega G, et al. Experimental HER2- targeted therapies for biliary tract cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. (2021) 30:389–99. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2021.1854724

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Javle M, Borad MJ, Azad NS, Kurzrock R, Abou-Alfa GK, George B, et al. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2-positive, metastatic biliary tract cancer (MyPathway): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2a, multiple basket study. Lancet Oncol. (2021) 22:1290–300. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00336-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ohba A, Morizane C, Ueno M, Kobayashi S, Kawamoto Y, Komatsu Y, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer: HERB trial. Future Oncol. (2022) 18:2351–60. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-0214

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Harding JJ, Fan J, Oh DY, Choi HJ, Kim JW, Chang HM, et al. Zanidatamab for HER2-amplified, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (HERIZON-BTC-01): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2b study. Lancet Oncol. (2023) 24:772–82. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00242-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Li X, Zhao L, Li W, Gao P, Zhang N. HER2-targeting CAR-T cells show highly efficient anti-tumor activity against glioblastoma both in vitro and in vivo. Genes Immun. (2024) 25:201–8. doi: 10.1038/s41435-024-00275-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zhu Y, Zhu X, Wei X, Tang C, Zhang W. HER2-targeted therapies in gastric cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. (2021) 1876:188549. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188549

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Cutri-French C, Nasioudis D, George E, Tanyi JL. CAR-T cell therapy in ovarian cancer: where are we now? Diagnostics (Basel). (2024) 14(8):819. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14080819

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Mercogliano MF, Bruni S, Mauro FL, Schillaci R. Emerging targeted therapies for HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 15(7):1987. doi: 10.3390/cancers15071987

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Hegde M, Navai S, DeRenzo C, Joseph SK, Sanber K, Wu M, et al. Autologous HER2-specific CAR T cells after lymphodepletion for advanced sarcoma: a phase 1 trial. Nat Cancer. (2024) 5:880–94. doi: 10.1038/s43018-024-00749-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Yue S, Zhang Y, Zhang W. Recent advances in immunotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. (2024) 25:1089–111. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01243-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Du J, Lv X, Zhang Z, Huang Z, Zhang E. Revisiting targeted therapy and immunotherapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1142690. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1142690

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Gondaliya P, Sayyed AA, Yan IK, Driscoll J, Ziemer A, Patel T. Targeting PD-L1 in cholangiocarcinoma using nanovesicle-based immunotherapy. Mol Ther. (2024) 32:2762–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.06.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Schrumpf E, Tan C, Karlsen TH, Sponheim J, Bjorkstrom NK, Sundnes O, et al. The biliary epithelium presents antigens to and activates natural killer T cells. Hepatology. (2015) 62:1249–59. doi: 10.1002/hep.27840

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Del Prete A, Salvi V, Soriani A, Laffranchi M, Sozio F, Bosisio D, et al. Dendritic cell subsets in cancer immunity and tumor antigen sensing. Cell Mol Immunol. (2023) 20:432–47. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-00990-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Adamik J, Munson PV, Maurer DM, Hartmann FJ, Bendall SC, Arguello RJ, et al. Immuno-metabolic dendritic cell vaccine signatures associate with overall survival in vaccinated melanoma patients. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:7211. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42881-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Han S, Lee SY, Wang WW, Tan YB, Sim RHZ, Cheong R, et al. A perspective on cell therapy and cancer vaccine in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Cancers (Basel). (2020) 12(11):3404. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113404

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Chouari T, La Costa FS, Merali N, Jessel MD, Sivakumar S, Annels N, et al. Advances in immunotherapeutics in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 15(17):4265. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174265

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Takahashi R, Yoshitomi M, Yutani S, Shirahama T, Noguchi M, Yamada A, et al. Current status of immunotherapy for the treatment of biliary tract cancer. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2013) 9:1069–72. doi: 10.4161/hv.23844

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Nakatsuka S, Oji Y, Horiuchi T, Kanda T, Kitagawa M, Takeuchi T, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of WT1 protein in a variety of cancer cells. Mod Pathol. (2006) 19:804–14. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800588

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Marks EI, Yee NS. Immunotherapeutic approaches in biliary tract carcinoma: Current status and emerging strategies. World J Gastrointest Oncol. (2015) 7:338–46. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i11.338

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Park SY, Roh SJ, Kim YN, Kim SZ, Park HS, Jang KY, et al. Expression of MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6 in cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic impact. Oncol Rep. (2009) 22:649–57. doi: 10.3892/or_00000485

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Lin B, Du L, Li H, Zhu X, Cui L, Li X. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes: Warriors fight against tumors powerfully. BioMed Pharmacother. (2020) 132:110873. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110873

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Alvisi G, Termanini A, Soldani C, Portale F, Carriero R, Pilipow K, et al. Multimodal single-cell profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma defines hyperactivated Tregs as a potential therapeutic target. J Hepatol. (2022) 77:1359–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.05.043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Liu D, Heij LR, Czigany Z, Dahl E, Lang SA, Ulmer TF, et al. The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in cholangiocarcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2022) 41:127. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02340-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Bang YH, Lee CK, Bang K, Kim HD, Kim KP, Jeong JH, et al. Artificial intelligence-powered spatial analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a potential biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with biliary tract cancer. Clin Cancer Res. (2024) 30:4635–43. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1265

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Tanaka R, Eguchi S, Kimura K, Ohira G, Tanaka S, Amano R, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and macrophages as a significant prognostic factor in biliary tract cancer. PloS One. (2023) 18:e0280348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280348

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Bo X, Wang J, Suo T, Ni X, Liu H, Shen S, et al. Tumor-infiltrating mast cells predict prognosis and gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapeutic benefit in biliary tract cancer patients. BMC Cancer. (2018) 18:313. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4220-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Kim HD, Kim JH, Ryu YM, Kim D, Lee S, Shin J, et al. Spatial distribution and prognostic implications of tumor-infiltrating foxP3- CD4+ T cells in biliary tract cancer. Cancer Res Treat. (2021) 53:162–71. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.704

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Tanaka R, Kimura K, Eguchi S, Tauchi J, Shibutani M, Shinkawa H, et al. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells in biliary tract cancer. Anticancer Res. (2020) 40:2881–7. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14264

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Sterner RC, Sterner RM. CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J. (2021) 11:69. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00459-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Creelan BC, Wang C, Teer JK, Toloza EM, Yao J, Kim S, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte treatment for anti-PD-1-resistant metastatic lung cancer: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med. (2021) 27:1410–8. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01462-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Gachechiladze M, Skarda J, Skanderova D, Uberall I, Kolek V, Smickova P, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and their association with PD-L1 expression and DNA repair protein RAD51 in patients with resected non-small cell lung carcinoma. Lung Cancer. (2020) 147:30–8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.06.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Fontugne J, Augustin J, Pujals A, Compagnon P, Rousseau B, Luciani A, et al. PD-L1 expression in perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:24644–51. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Ye Y, Zhou L, Xie X, Jiang G, Xie H, Zheng S. Interaction of B7-H1 on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells with PD-1 on tumor-infiltrating T cells as a mechanism of immune evasion. J Surg Oncol. (2009) 100:500–4. doi: 10.1002/jso.21376

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Lim YJ, Koh J, Kim K, Chie EK, Kim S, Lee KB, et al. Clinical implications of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 expression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients undergoing surgery plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Target Oncol. (2017) 12:211–8. doi: 10.1007/s11523-016-0474-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Ueno T, Tsuchikawa T, Hatanaka KC, Hatanaka Y, Mitsuhashi T, Nakanishi Y, et al. Prognostic impact of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and its association with epithelial-mesenchymal transition in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. (2018) 9:20034–47. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Nakamura H, Arai Y, Totoki Y, Shirota T, Elzawahry A, Kato M, et al. Genomic spectra of biliary tract cancer. Nat Genet. (2015) 47:1003–10. doi: 10.1038/ng.3375

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Liu Y, Huang W, Cai Z. Synthesizing AND gate minigene circuits based on CRISPReader for identification of bladder cancer cells. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:5486. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19314-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Nissim L, Wu MR, Pery E, Binder-Nissim A, Suzuki HI, Stupp D, et al. Synthetic RNA-based immunomodulatory gene circuits for cancer immunotherapy. Cell. (2017) 171:1138–50:e1115. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Roybal KT, Rupp LJ, Morsut L, Walker WJ, McNally KA, Park JS, et al. Precision tumor recognition by T cells with combinatorial antigen-sensing circuits. Cell. (2016) 164:770–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Williams JZ, Allen GM, Shah D, Sterin IS, Kim KH, Garcia VP, et al. Precise T cell recognition programs designed by transcriptionally linking multiple receptors. Science. (2020) 370:1099–104. doi: 10.1126/science.abc6270

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Frankel NW, Deng H, Yucel G, Gainer M, Leemans N, Lam A, et al. Precision off-the-shelf natural killer cell therapies for oncology with logic-gated gene circuits. Cell Rep. (2024) 43:114145. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Chen J, Amoozgar Z, Liu X, Aoki S, Liu Z, Shin SM, et al. Reprogramming the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma immune microenvironment by chemotherapy and CTLA-4 blockade enhances anti-PD-1 therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. (2024) 12:400–12. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-23-0486

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Biffi G, Tuveson DA. Diversity and biology of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Physiol Rev. (2021) 101:147–76. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Ilyas SI, Affo S, Goyal L, Lamarca A, Sapisochin G, Yang JD, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma - novel biological insights and therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2023) 20:470–86. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00770-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Chen Y, McAndrews KM, Kalluri R. Clinical and therapeutic relevance of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2021) 18:792–804. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00546-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Cantallops Vila P, Ravichandra A, Agirre Lizaso A, Perugorria MJ, Affo S. Heterogeneity, crosstalk, and targeting of cancer-associated fibroblasts in cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. (2024) 79:941–58. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000206

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Affo S, Nair A, Brundu F, Ravichandra A, Bhattacharjee S, Matsuda M, et al. Promotion of cholangiocarcinoma growth by diverse cancer-associated fibroblast subpopulations. Cancer Cell. (2021) 39:866–882.e811. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.03.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Xu M, Zhang T, Xia R, Wei Y, Wei X. Targeting the tumor stroma for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. (2022) 21:208. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01670-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Zhao J, Chen J, Li C, Xiang H, Miao X. Hyaluronidase overcomes the extracellular matrix barrier to enhance local drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. (2024) 203:114474. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114474

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Hosein AN, Brekken RA, Maitra A. Pancreatic cancer stroma: an update on therapeutic targeting strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 17:487–505. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0300-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Ettrich TJ, Ebert M, Lorenzen S, Moehler M, Vogel A, Witkowski L, et al. ASCO- and ESMO-update 2017 - highlights of the 53. meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/ASCO 2017 and European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO congress 2017. Z Gastroenterol. (2018) 56:384–97. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-101757

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Van Cutsem E, Tempero MA, Sigal D, Oh DY, Fazio N, Macarulla T, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pegvorhyaluronidase alfa with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for patients with hyaluronan-high metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. (2020) 38:3185–94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00590

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Wang S, Li Y, Xu C, Dong J, Wei J. An oncolytic vaccinia virus encoding hyaluronidase reshapes the extracellular matrix to enhance cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. (2024) 12(3):e008431. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008431

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Isidan A, Yenigun A, Soma D, Aksu E, Lopez K, Park Y, et al. Development and characterization of human primary cholangiocarcinoma cell lines. Am J Pathol. (2022) 192:1200–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.05.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Pan S, Hu Y, Gan L, Lai J, Zheng P, Zhang Y, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 inducing COL1A1 synthesis via integrin alpha V promotes invasion and metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma cells. Ann Hepatol. (2024) 29:101279. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101279

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Mancarella S, Serino G, Dituri F, Cigliano A, Ribback S, Wang J, et al. Crenigacestat, a selective NOTCH1 inhibitor, reduces intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression by blocking VEGFA/DLL4/MMP13 axis. Cell Death Differ. (2020) 27:2330–43. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0505-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Song X, Si Q, Qi R, Liu W, Li M, Guo M, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1: A promising therapeutic target in Malignant tumor. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:800630. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.800630

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Tang K, Wu YH, Song Y, Yu B. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitors in clinical trials for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. (2021) 14:68. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01080-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Sun C, Wang B, Hao S. Adenosine-A2A receptor pathway in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:837230. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.837230

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Martinez-Ordonez A, Duran A, Ruiz-Martinez M, Cid-Diaz T, Zhang X, Han Q, et al. Hyaluronan driven by epithelial aPKC deficiency remodels the microenvironment and creates a vulnerability in mesenchymal colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell. (2023) 41:252–271.e259. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.11.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Lee YE, Go GY, Koh EY, Yoon HN, Seo M, Hong SM, et al. Synergistic therapeutic combination with a CAF inhibitor enhances CAR-NK-mediated cytotoxicity via reduction of CAF-released IL-6. J Immunother Cancer. (2023) 11(2):e006130. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-006130

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Zheng R, Shen K, Liang S, Lyu Y, Zhang S, Dong H, et al. Specific ECM degradation potentiates the antitumor activity of CAR-T cells in solid tumors. Cell Mol Immunol. (2024) 21:1491–504. doi: 10.1038/s41423-024-01228-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Waldhauer I, Gonzalez-Nicolini V, Freimoser-Grundschober A, Nayak TK, Fahrni L, Hosse RJ, et al. Simlukafusp alfa (FAP-IL2v) immunocytokine is a versatile combination partner for cancer immunotherapy. MAbs. (2021) 13:1913791. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2021.1913791

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: biliary tract malignancies, cell therapy, immunotherapy, tumor microenvironment, combined therapy

Citation: Ao J, Hu M, Wang J and Jiang X (2025) Advancing biliary tract malignancy treatment: emerging frontiers in cell-based therapies. Front. Immunol. 16:1559465. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1559465

Received: 12 January 2025; Accepted: 27 January 2025;
Published: 12 February 2025.

Edited by:

Yu’e Liu, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

Reviewed by:

Jie Xian, University of California, San Diego, United States
Xutong Xue, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

Copyright © 2025 Ao, Hu, Wang and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jinghan Wang, RWhoYnBAdG9uZ2ppLmVkdS5jbg==; Xiaoqing Jiang, MjEwMDU3N0B0b25namkuZWR1LmNu

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more