
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550963
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancements in Diagnostic Technologies for Early Detection of Autoimmune Diseases View all 4 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
AbstractBackground: Early diagnosis and treatment for encephalitis are crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing the economic burden, especially given the overlapping symptoms and low specificity of auxiliary diagnostic tests between viral encephalitis (VE) and autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Since these two conditions require different treatment approaches, an early differential diagnosis between AE and VE is a critical challenge. Methods: This study enrolled a cohort of 75 patients (38 with VE and 37 with AE) be-tween September 2022 and July 2024. The demographic data, clinical characteristics and laboratory test results were collected. The expression levels of co-stimulatory mole-cules were detected by flow cytometry and ELISA within 7 days for viral enceph-alitis and 90 days for autoimmune encephalitis in the early phase of the disease. Dif-ferential analysis, logistic regression analysis, and Lasso regression were employed for model construction. Finally, a nomogram and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve were developed to visualize the model and evaluate its predictive accura-cy. Results: Upon analyzing the collected data, a model for the early differential diagnosis between AE and VE was eventually established. This comprehensive model incorpo-rates ten variables: serum creatinine and chloride levels, the percentage of peripheral blood CD4+ICOS+ and CD19+PD-L1+, plasma sICOSL (soluble Inducible Costimula-tory Ligand), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose content, and the presence of fever, nau-sea, vomiting, as well as headaches and cognitive impairment. Among them, patients with creatinine <60.75 (μmol/L), chloride <106.25 (mmol/L), CD4+ICOS+ ≥11.2%, CD19+PD-L1+ ≥12.35%, plasma sICOSL≥286.37 ng/mL, CSF sugar content ≥3.775 (mmol/L), and those with cognitive impairment are more likely to be diagnosed with AE. The AUC-ROC of our model is 0.942 (95% CI: 0.887-0.997), with a sensitivity of 0.844 and a specificity of 0.971, indicating strong diagnostic performance.Conclusion: This diagnostic model offers a convenient tool for distinguishing AE from VE in the early phase, facilitating early diagnosis and treatment, improving patient prognosis, and reducing financial burdens.
Keywords: co-stimulatory molecules, autoimmune encephalitis, Viral Encephalitis, differential diagnosis, predictive model
Received: 24 Dec 2024; Accepted: 26 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Jia, Duan, Chen, Xiao, Zhu, Wang, Gu, Tian and Xue. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jingluan Tian, Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Qun Xue, Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.