ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1541907

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancements in Diagnostic Technologies for Early Detection of Autoimmune DiseasesView all 6 articles

A Serum Biomarker Panel and Miniarray Detection System for Tracking Disease Activity and Flare Risk in Lupus Nephritis

Provisionally accepted
Chenling  TangChenling Tang1Gongjun  TanGongjun Tan1Aygun  TeymurAygun Teymur1Jiechang  GuoJiechang Guo1Arturo  Haces-GarciaArturo Haces-Garcia1Weihang  ZhuWeihang Zhu1Richard  WilliamsRichard Williams2Jing  NingJing Ning3Ramesh  SaxenaRamesh Saxena4Tianfu  WuTianfu Wu1*
  • 1University of Houston, Houston, United States
  • 2Iolight Co, Hampshire, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
  • 4University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

By integrating serum immunoassay screening with genomic expression databases and machine learning techniques, we discovered a biomarker panel of lupus nephritis (LN) to develop a sandwich-structure quantitative immunoarray. The sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and stability of the biomarker-panel mini-array (BPMA) were examined. Serum samples from LN patients and healthy controls were tested to compare the performance of BPMA with ELISA. The performance of BPMA in disease monitoring was validated with machine models using a larger cohort of LN. The BPMA was also used to determine LN flare using a machine-learning generated flare score (F-Score).Among 32 promising LN serum biomarkers, VSIG4, TNFRSF1b, VCAM1, ALCAM, OPN, and IgG anti-dsDNA antibody were selected to constitute an LN biomarker Panel, which exhibited excellent discriminative value in distinguishing LN from healthy controls (AUC = 1.0) and active LN from inactive LN (AUC = 0.92), respectively. Also, the 6-biomarker panel exhibited a strong correlation with key clinical parameters of LN. A multiplexed immunoarray was constructed with the 6-biomarker panel (named BPMA-S6 thereafter). An LN-specific 8-point standard curve was generated for each protein biomarker. Cross-reaction between these biomarkers was minimal (< 1%). BPMA-S6 test results were highly correlated with those from ELISA (Spearman's correlation: fluorescent detection, rs = 0.95; colorimetric detection, rs = 0.91). The discriminative value of BPMA-S6 for LN was further validated using an independent cohort (AUC = 0.94). Using a longitudinal cohort of LN, the derived F-Score exhibited superior discriminative value in the training dataset (AUC = 0.92) and testing dataset (AUC=0.82) to distinguish flare vs remission.BPMA-S6 may represent a promising point-of-care test (POCT) for the diagnosis, disease monitoring, and assessment of LN flare.

Keywords: Biomarker panel, Lupus Nephritis, disease monitoring, Flare assesment, poin-of-care diagnostics

Received: 09 Dec 2024; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tang, Tan, Teymur, Guo, Haces-Garcia, Zhu, Williams, Ning, Saxena and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tianfu Wu, University of Houston, Houston, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more