ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Inflammation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1539163
This article is part of the Research TopicExploring Frontiers: Astroparticle, Space Science and Public Health for Future Crewed Space MissionsView all 9 articles
Hazards of Lunar Surface Exploration: Determining the Immunogenicity/Allergenicity of Lunar dust
Provisionally accepted- 1KBRwyle, Houston, United States
- 2JES Tech, Houston, Texas, United States
- 3Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States
- 4Johnson Space Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston, Texas, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Although infrequent, there have been Apollo program reports of lunar dust exposure leading to notable upper respiratory symptoms in select crewmembers. Possible mechanisms include particulate irritation, inflammation from toxic insult, or legitimate adaptive immune-mediated response. Although sterile non-protein matter would not be expected to be immunogenic, one Apollo flight surgeon reported increasing symptoms upon repeated perceived exposure with associated eosinophilia, suggestive of possible allergic reactions [1]. Many International Space Station (ISS) crews display a pattern of persistent immune system dysregulation and latent virus reactivation [2,3]. Some ISS crews manifest atypical respiratory and/or dermatitis symptoms which could have an allergic component [4]. It is logical to anticipate crew immune dysregulation could worsen during prolonged deep space missions and planetary surface hazards will only complicate crew health risks. Allergic (i.e. mast cell-mediated) reactivity could adversely increase negative clinical and operational impacts for long-duration lunar astronauts and affect countermeasure requirements for surface vehicles. This study investigated whether lunar dust exposure could possibly elicit an IgE mediated allergic response during spaceflight by utilizing in vitro cell culture models. Our laboratory was officially approved for receipt of actual lunar dust samples from the Apollo 16 mission from NASA. These samples were used to complete the proposed set of in vitro cell culture experiments, using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy individuals, and basophils and eosinophil cell lines. Cells were co-cultured with cellular mitogens, common recall antigens (Der p1), fine ground silica quartz (control), or lunar dust, to study whether lunar dust exposure could alter the generation of selective immune responses associated with clinical allergic reactions. Measured outputs included supernatant-derived total IgE, tryptase, histamine, and selected cytokine levels. Cellular activation was monitored by assessing activation markers via flow cytometry. EM/x-ray analysis was used to determine cellular interactions with dust particles. The assessments in primary human blood immune cells indicated no evidence for cellular responsiveness nor 'allergy-like' reactivity to lunar dust. Assessments using purified 'allergic' cell lines, did yield some unique but mild responsiveness to lunar dust, however such cells lines can have response profiles somewhat different from their in vivo counterparts.
Keywords: Lunar dust, spaceflight, allergy, immunology, NASA
Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Colorado, Gutierrez, Nelman-Gonzalez, Marshall, Mccoy and Crucian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Brian Crucian, Johnson Space Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston, 77058, Texas, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.