ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Systems Immunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1528524

This article is part of the Research TopicSystems Immunology and Translational Research in Infectious DiseasesView all 4 articles

Serologic biomarker discovery for differentiating Lyme disease from diseases with similar clinical symptoms using broad profiling of antibody binding

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Arizona State University, Tempe, United States
  • 2Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Lyme disease (LD) is a tick-borne disease that is a substantial public health burden with estimated about 0.5 million new cases per year in the US and increasing incidence. Differentiating Lyme disease, especially in its early stages, from other febrile illnesses with similar clinical symptoms (look-alike diseases) represents a significant challenge due to the lack of diagnostic tools. Current diagnostic tools based on serology were not specifically developed for differential diagnosis and show limited sensitivity in early LD resulting in high false negative rates. The work presented here focuses on a broad profiling of the humoral immune response in terms of circulating antibody repertoire in patients diagnosed with LD and a number of diseases with similar clinical symptoms. A combination of antibody binding to a library of linear, diverse peptides and machine learning methods revealed a panel of biomarker proteins from the proteome of the Borrelia burgdorferi bacterium (LD causing pathogen) that can be used to differentiate between LD and other diseases. A subset of the biomarkers was independently validated and demonstrated to show robust differentiating power. Importantly, the discovered biomarkers distinguish between LD patients that previously tested negative with the current test standard (false negatives) and the look-alike diseases. These findings are important in that the discovered biomarkers can be utilized for differential diagnosis of LD. Furthermore, because the discovery approach is agnostic, the results suggest that it can also be used for biomarker discovery of other diseases.

Keywords: Humoral immune response , Lyme Disease, Differentiating diagnosis, machine learning, peptide array analyses, seronegative Lyme disease

Received: 15 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kelbauskas, Zhang, Baert and Woodbury. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Laimonas Kelbauskas, Arizona State University, Tempe, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.