
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CASE REPORT article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1527102
This article is part of the Research Topic Monoclonal antibodies in treating multiple sclerosis (MS), and related diseases. View all 9 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) differ in their molecular structures, epitope recognition, and mechanisms of CD20-positive (CD20+) cell lysis, which may impact clinical efficacy and tolerability and support within-class switching for patients with suboptimal response to a prior anti-CD20 mAb.Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 7 individuals with MS treated in private practice or at an MS clinic who switched to ublituximab from a different anti-CD20 mAb therapy due to efficacy or tolerability concerns.Case Descriptions: Details of each case, including clinical and/or radiological outcomes on initial anti-CD20 mAb therapy, reasons for switching, and outcomes after starting ublituximab therapy are provided.Discussion: These cases highlight suboptimal B-cell depletion, inadequate MS disease control, and/or tolerability concerns in people with MS who had clinical improvements or stabilization of disease following a switch from ocrelizumab or rituximab to ublituximab.Conclusion: Within-class switching from a prior anti-CD20 mAb therapy to ublituximab is feasible and may improve outcomes in some people with MS.
Keywords: Anti-CD20, B-cell depletion, Disability, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Ocrelizumab, rituximab, ublituximab
Received: 12 Nov 2024; Accepted: 04 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Berkovich, Calkwood, Crayton, Erwin, Faissner, Gold, Katz and Leekoff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Regina Berkovich, Department of Neurology, Berkovich MS Center and Research Institute, West Hollywood, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.