data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1527057
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is an autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system, characterized by seropositive MOG antibodies. MOGAD can present with a monophasic or relapsing course, where repeated relapses may lead to a worse prognosis and increased disability. Currently, little is known about the risk factors for predicting MOGAD relapse in a short period, and few established prediction models exist, posing a challenge to timely and personalized clinical diagnosis and treatment.Methods: From April 2018 to December 2023, we enrolled 88 patients diagnosed with MOGAD at the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University and collected basic clinical data. The data were randomly divided into a training cohort (80%) and a validation cohort (20%). Univariate logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for 1-year relapse. A prediction model was constructed, and a nomogram was developed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate and internally validate model performance.Results: Among 88 MOGAD patients, 29 relapsed within 1 year of onset (33%). A total of 4 independent risk factors for predicting relapse were identified: female sex (P=0.040), cortical encephalitis phenotype (P=0.032), serum MOG antibody titer ≥1:32 (P=0.007), and immunosuppressive therapy after the first onset (P= 0.045). The area under curve (AUC) value of the nomogram prediction model constructed with these four factors was 0.866 in the training cohort, and 0.864 in the validation cohort. The cutoff value of the total nomogram score was 140 points, distinguishing the low relapse risk group from the high relapse risk group (P < 0.001). The calibration curve demonstrated high consistency in prediction, and the DCA showed excellent net benefit in the prediction model. Tested by ROC curve, calibration curve, and DCA, the nomogram model also demonstrates significant value in predicting MOGAD relapse within 2 years.Conclusion: The nomogram model we developed can help accurately predict the relapse risk of MOGAD patients within one year of onset and assist clinicians in making treatment decisions to reduce the chance of relapse
Keywords: myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorder, Relapse prediction, nomogram, Risk factors
Received: 12 Nov 2024; Accepted: 18 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cheng, Wang, Wang, Pang, Wang, Zhang, Guo and Meng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Huaxing Meng, Department of Neurology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.