Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1525110
This article is part of the Research Topic Combination Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). View all articles

Phase 2 study of chidamide in combination with CAG and venetoclax-azacitidine in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Provisionally accepted
Qingyang Liu Qingyang Liu 1,2Jingjing Yang Jingjing Yang 1,2Lei Lv Lei Lv 1,2Xiawei Zhang Xiawei Zhang 1,2Meng Li Meng Li 1Lingmin Xu Lingmin Xu 1Sai Huang Sai Huang 1*Yu Jing Yu Jing 1*Liping Dou Liping Dou 1*
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Senior Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital., Beijing, China
  • 2 Medical School of Chinese PLA., Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) respond poorly to standard induction therapy. DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and histone-deacetylases (HDACs) are key regulators of gene expression in cells and have been investigated as important therapeutic targets. However, their effects remains unclear as induction therapy for AML. Previously untreated AML patients aged 60 years and over (N=40) were enrolled into this single arm, open-label, phase 2 study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of chidamide combined with CAG and venetoclax-azacitidine (referred to as CACAG-VEN) in elderly AML patients (NCT05659992).All patients received induction treatment with aclarubicin (10 mg/m2/d on days 1, 3, and 5), azacitidine (75 mg/m2 on days 1-7), cytarabine (75 mg/m2 bid on days 1-5), chidamide (30 mg, twice/week for 2 weeks), and venetoclax (100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, 400 mg on days 3-14). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 μg/kg/day was administered. The overall response rate was 97.5%, with a composite complete response (CRc) rate of 85.0% after one cycle of CACAG-VEN. Patients with adverse risk according to the ELN guidelines had CRc rates of 81.3%. No patients experienced early death within 30 days of therapy initiation. Grade 3 -4 non-hematological adverse events included febrile neutropenia in 15 (37.5%) of 40 patients, pneumonia in three (7.5%), sepsis in two (5.0%) and blood bilirubin increase in one (2.5%). The 12-month overall survival rate was 73.4% (95% CI: 55.9-84.8%). The median time to recovery was 15.0 (IQR 10.0-19.5) days for platelets ≥ 20000/μL and 13.0 (IQR 10.5-17.0) days for an absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1000 cells/μL after induction therapy. In conclusion, chidamide in combination with CAG and venetoclax-azacitidine was effective and well tolerated in elderly patients with AML.

    Keywords: venetoclax, Azacitidine, CACAG-VEN regimen, older patients, Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Received: 08 Nov 2024; Accepted: 07 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Yang, Lv, Zhang, Li, Xu, Huang, Jing and Dou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Sai Huang, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Senior Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital., Beijing, China
    Yu Jing, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Senior Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital., Beijing, China
    Liping Dou, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Senior Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital., Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.