Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Comparative Immunology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1522005
This article is part of the Research Topic Community Series in Aquatic Nutrition and Intestine Immunity: Volume II View all articles

Cottonseed protein concentrate as an effective substitute to fishmeal in pike perch (Sander luciperca) feed : Evidence from growth performance, intestinal responses of immune function and microflora

Provisionally accepted
Ze Fan Ze Fan 1*Jie Zhao Jie Zhao 1Jiaming Huang Jiaming Huang 2Cuiyun Lu Cuiyun Lu 1Di Wu Di Wu 1Zhipeng Sun Zhipeng Sun 1Liansheng Wang Liansheng Wang 1Jinnan Li Jinnan Li 1Xianhu Zheng Xianhu Zheng 1
  • 1 Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute, Harbin, China
  • 2 Guangdong Evergreen Feed Industry Co., Ltd., Zhanjiang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The aim of this study was to assess the response characteristic of intestinal immune function and microflora of pike perch (Sander luciperca) on cottonseed protein concentrate(CPC) as a substitute for fish meal. A basal diet was formulated to contain 55% fishmeal, and then CPC was used to replace 0% (CPC0), 20% (CPC1), 40% (CPC2), 60% (CPC3) of dietary fishmeal. The four diets were fed to pikeperch with initial body weight of 3.55 ± 0.01 g for 8 weeks. Results revealed that there were no significant effects of dietary CPC levels on survival rate, mass gain rate and specific growth rate. The maximal value of feeding efficiency ratio was presented in CPC3 group and was significantly higher than that of the control group.Significantly lower value of hepatosomatic index and crude ash content and higher crude protein content were observed in CPC3 group. Trypsin activity in CPC3 group was reduced to the lowest level compared to the control group and CPC1 group. Among three CPC substitution groups, increments in the intestinal antioxidant enzymes activities, glutathione content and anti-inflammatory factor expression and down-regulation in pro-inflammatory factors were observed with increasing CPC substitution. Injury degree of intestinal mechanical barrier was mitigated in step with relief of oxidative damage and inflammation as increasing CPC substitution ratio. Conclusively, 60% fishmeal could be basically replaced by CPC based on the above results. However, increasing dietary CPC substitution slightly increased Firmicutes abundance and obviously decreased Actinobacteriota abundance, but the abundance of Proteobacteria in CPC3 group was appreciably elevated. The elevation of Staphylococcus and the reduction of Lactobacillus were observed in the CPC2 and CPC3 groups. igf1 expressions were significantly down-regulated with increasing CPC substitution. Henceforth, the above two limit factors should be considered as key breakthroughs improving the utilization effectiveness of CPC replacing fish meal for pikeperch. The current findings provided the ponderable reference and breakthrough in improving the application effectiveness of CPC replacing fish meal for pikeperch.

    Keywords: pikeperch (Sander luciperca), cottonseed protein concentrate (CPC), 60% substitution ratio for fishmeal, dcreasing igf1 expression, intestinal microflora

    Received: 03 Nov 2024; Accepted: 03 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Fan, Zhao, Huang, Lu, Wu, Sun, Wang, Li and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ze Fan, Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute, Harbin, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.