Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1521362

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Provisionally accepted
Ji Ren Ji Ren Jinghe Wang Jinghe Wang *Yanan Wang Yanan Wang *Dongying Yang Dongying Yang *Jianming Sheng Jianming Sheng *Shili Zhu Shili Zhu *Yunli Liu Yunli Liu *Xiaoqi Li Xiaoqi Li *Wei Liu Wei Liu *
  • School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: The combination of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors with chemotherapy (CT) is currently under evaluation as a first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This study sought to assess the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic combination in patients with advanced or recurrent EC. Methods: We performed an exhaustive review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 25, 2024, examining the efficacy and safety of combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT versus CT alone (or plus placebo) in advanced or recurrent EC. Efficacy was measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while safety was assessed by the incidence of any grade or grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS, as well as risk ratios (RRs) for AEs, each accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To evaluate heterogeneity, we employed Cochran’s Q test, I2 statistics, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs). Results: Our analysis incorporated 6 studies, encompassing a total of 2,954 patients. The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.617, 95% CI: 0.506-0.752; 95% PI: 0.334-1.140) and OS (HR = 0.774, 95% CI: 0.664-0.902; 95% PI: 0.553-1.083) compared to CT alone (or plus placebo) in the overall population. Subgroup analysis based on mismatch repair (MMR) status revealed pronounced benefits in PFS and OS for patients with deficient MMR (dMMR) (PFS: HR = 0.344, 95% CI: 0.269-0.438; 95% PI: 0.231-0.510; OS: HR = 0.371, 95% CI: 0.245-0.562; 95% PI: 0.025-5.461) compared to those with proficient MMR (pMMR). Although there was no observed difference in the incidence of any grades AEs, the risk of grade ≥ 3 AEs was elevated in the group receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with CT. Conclusion: The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT significantly improved PFS and OS in advanced or recurrent EC patients, with particularly pronounced benefits observed in those with dMMR. Clinicians can tailor treatment strategies according to individual patient characteristics to optimize therapeutic outcomes, while remaining alert to the possibility of AEs in clinical practice.

    Keywords: PD-1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, endometrial cancer

    Received: 01 Nov 2024; Accepted: 07 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ren, Wang, Wang, Yang, Sheng, Zhu, Liu, Li and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Jinghe Wang, School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China
    Yanan Wang, School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China
    Dongying Yang, School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China
    Jianming Sheng, School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China
    Shili Zhu, School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China
    Yunli Liu, School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China
    Xiaoqi Li, School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China
    Wei Liu, School of Medicine and Nursing, Dezhou University, Dezhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.