Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Alloimmunity and Transplantation

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1516146

Quality of life improvements and clinical assessments in kidney transplant recipients undergoing pegloticase treatment for uncontrolled gout: findings of the phase 4 PROTECT clinical trial

Provisionally accepted
Abdul Abdellatif Abdul Abdellatif 1Lin Zhao Lin Zhao 2Katie Obermeyer Katie Obermeyer 2Zana Vranic Zana Vranic 2Brad A. Marder Brad A. Marder 2*John D. Scandling John D. Scandling 3
  • 1 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
  • 2 Amgen (United States), Thousand Oaks, United States
  • 3 School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Gout is 12-times more prevalent in kidney transplant (KT) recipients than in non-transplanted population. We report quality-of-life (QOL) and clinical assessment findings from the PROTECT trial examining pegloticase efficacy and safety in KT recipients with uncontrolled gout (SU≥7mg/dL, oral urate-lowering therapy refractory/intolerant, and ≥2 flares/yr, unresolving tophi, or chronic gouty arthritis), KT>1 yr prior, graft eGFR≥15 ml/min/1.73m 2 , and stable immunosuppression). Pegloticase was administered for 24-weeks. QOL endpoints included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; Disability Index, Health, Pain) and Physician Global Assessment of Gout. Key clinical assessments included proportion with resolution of ≥1 tophus and change from baseline in blood pressure (BP) at Week-24. Twenty KT recipients (85.0% male, age: 53.9±10.9 years, BMI: 30.6±7.2kg/m 2 , eGFR: 45.8±11.9ml/min/1.73m 2 , time since kidney transplantgraft age: 14.6±6.9 years) were included. The primary endpoint was achieved with 89% of patients reaching and maintaining a SU of <6 mg/dL atduring Month 6. Meaningful improvements occurred over 24 weeks of treatment in all QOL measures (mean [95% CI] change from baseline: HAQ--

    Keywords: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Critical review, and editing. LZ: Conceptualization, and editing. KO: Conceptualization

    Received: 23 Oct 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Abdellatif, Zhao, Obermeyer, Vranic, Marder and Scandling. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Brad A. Marder, Amgen (United States), Thousand Oaks, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more