data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Alloimmunity and Transplantation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1516146
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Gout is 12-times more prevalent in kidney transplant (KT) recipients than in non-transplanted population. We report quality-of-life (QOL) and clinical assessment findings from the PROTECT trial examining pegloticase efficacy and safety in KT recipients with uncontrolled gout (SU≥7mg/dL, oral urate-lowering therapy refractory/intolerant, and ≥2 flares/yr, unresolving tophi, or chronic gouty arthritis), KT>1 yr prior, graft eGFR≥15 ml/min/1.73m 2 , and stable immunosuppression). Pegloticase was administered for 24-weeks. QOL endpoints included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; Disability Index, Health, Pain) and Physician Global Assessment of Gout. Key clinical assessments included proportion with resolution of ≥1 tophus and change from baseline in blood pressure (BP) at Week-24. Twenty KT recipients (85.0% male, age: 53.9±10.9 years, BMI: 30.6±7.2kg/m 2 , eGFR: 45.8±11.9ml/min/1.73m 2 , time since kidney transplantgraft age: 14.6±6.9 years) were included. The primary endpoint was achieved with 89% of patients reaching and maintaining a SU of <6 mg/dL atduring Month 6. Meaningful improvements occurred over 24 weeks of treatment in all QOL measures (mean [95% CI] change from baseline: HAQ--
Keywords: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Critical review, and editing. LZ: Conceptualization, and editing. KO: Conceptualization
Received: 23 Oct 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Abdellatif, Zhao, Obermeyer, Vranic, Marder and Scandling. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Brad A. Marder, Amgen (United States), Thousand Oaks, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.