The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Alloimmunity and Transplantation
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1514033
This article is part of the Research Topic Impact of New Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Post-transplant Tumors on the Outcome of the Transplanted Organ View all articles
PDL1 inhibitors may be associated with a lower risk of allograft rejection than PD1 and CTLA4 inhibitors: analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database
Provisionally accepted- 1 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
- 2 UMR7370 Laboratoire de Physio Médecine Moléculaire (LP2M), Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
- 3 Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
Transplant recipients face increased cancer mortality due to immunosuppressive treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved survival rates, but data on the use of these agents in transplant recipients is scarce. ICI may trigger allograft rejection, but the absolute risk of AR between the different ICI classes remains to be defined.VigiBase® (WHO's pharmacovigilance database) was queried for reports of AR involving CTLA4, PD1, or PDL1 inhibitors. Disproportionality analysis compares the proportion of reports with a specific adverse drug reaction (ADR) and a given drug to the proportion of reports with the same ADR and other drugs. A lower 95% confidence interval for the Information Component (IC) >0 suggests a signal. The comparative Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) for AR, between PD1 and PDL1 inhibitors, was calculated.We gathered 159 AR involving an ICI, especially nivolumab (73, 45.9%), mostly affecting kidneys (87, 54.7%). Median time-to-onset: 28 days. Fatal outcome: 36 reports (22.6%). ICI were significantly associated with AR: IC=1.7 [1.4;1.9]. Specifically, PD1 inhibitors yielded an IC of 2.0 [1.7;2.2] (152 reports observed compared to 38 expected). By contrast, the IC of PDL1 inhibitors was negative: -2.6 [-6.4;-1.0] (1 observed, 9 expected). The comparative ROR of PD1 compared to PDL1 inhibitors was 33.7 [4.7;240.9] (p=0.0005).We confirm the association between ICI treatment and AR. Notably, PDL1 inhibitors showed surprisingly low AR reports compared to CTLA4 and PD1 inhibitors. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm whether PDL1 inhibitors indeed reduce AR risk compared to other ICI.
Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitors, allograft rejection, Transplantation, Pharmacovigilance, oncology
Received: 19 Oct 2024; Accepted: 07 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gérard, Merino, Benzaquen, Destere, Borchiellini, Gosset, Rocher, Andreani, Marquette, Montaudié, Drici and Sicard. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Alexandre Destere, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
Delphine Borchiellini, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, 06189, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
Clément Gosset, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
Fanny Rocher, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
Marine Andreani, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
Charles-Hugo Marquette, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
Milou-Daniel Drici, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
Antoine Sicard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.