Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol. , 18 February 2025

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1514003

Similarities and differences of a proliferation-inducing ligand expression in lacrimal gland lesions of patients with IgG4-associated ophthalmic diseases and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

Lvfu He,Lvfu He1,2Lisha ZhanLisha Zhan2Yu YangYu Yang3Weimin He*Weimin He1*
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 2The Third Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, Sichuan, China
  • 3Department of Ophthalmology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the expression condition of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) in lacrimal gland lesions of patients with IgG4-associated ophthalmic diseases (IgG4-ROD) and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma.

Patients and methods: Fifteen patients with IgG4-ROD, 3 with MALT lymphoma, and 1 with elevated IgG4 with lacrimal gland lesions, treated in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April 2022 to November 2023, were included. Immunofluorescence staining was used to detect the expression of APRIL in the specimen of lacrimal gland.

Results: The average expression level of APRIL in patients with lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma were 8471.12 pixels/HPF and 2950.78 pixels/HPF respectively. The positive rates of APRIL were 10.49% and 7.23% respectively. CD138 and APRIL were colocalized, and the positive rate of their colocalization was 8.83%, and the positive areas of colocalization coincidence was 946.84 pixels/HPF in patients with IgG4-ROD. CD20 and APRIL were colocalized, and the positive rate of their colocalization was 7.04%, and the positive areas of colocalization coincidence was 949.78 pixels/HPF in patients with MALT lymphoma. We also found that the expression level and the positive rate of APRIL were positively correlated with the level of serum IgG4 in IgG4-ROD patients (r=0.5820, P=0.029; r= 0.6261, P=0.017; respectively). In addition, the positive rate and the positive areas of CD138 and APRIL colocalization were also positively correlated with serum IgG4 level (r=0.6420, P=0.013; r= 0.5673, P=0.034; respectively).

Conclusion: APRIL is highly expressed in lacrimal gland lesions of patients with IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma. This overexpression may facilitate the enrichment of CD138+ plasma cells and is associated with elevated serum IgG4 levels in patients with IgG4-ROD. Additionally, it may promote the proliferation of CD20+ B lymphocytes in patients with MALT lymphoma.APRIL may play a certain role in the possible transformation of IgG4-ROD into MALT lymphoma.

1 Introduction

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a complex immune-mediated inflammatory condition that has the potency to impact numerous organ systems (1). Specifically, when the eye is affected, it is called immunoglobulin G4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD). Numerous studies confirmed the involvement of T cell subsets (24), plasma blast cells (5), B cells (6), macrophages (7), eosinophils (8) and mast cells (9) in the pathological processes of IgG4-RD. The disease was characterized by the activation of type 2 helper T cells and regulatory T cells, leading to the production of cytokines that promote fibrosis and an increased synthesis of Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) and IgE (10). The main pathological features of IgG4-RD include infiltration of IgG4+ plasma cells, tumor-like growth, matted fibrosis, and obliterative phlebitis (11). While occlusive phlebitis is rare in IgG4-ROD patients (12), collagen fibrosis is commonly observed in lacrimal gland lesions (11, 13).

A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) is expressed in various immune cells, including neutrophils, eosinophils, and macrophages (1416). It serves several physiological functions, such as inducing immunoglobulin class switching and promoting the survival of plasma cells (17). These effects are mediated through two distinct APRIL signaling receptor pathways: transmembrane activator and calcium regulator with cyclophilin coupling (TACI) and B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) (18). Additionally, APRIL requires binding to receptors for heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) to effectively transmit signals to plasma cells (19, 20). Moreover, studies found that APRIL was highly expressed in submandibular gland and renal tissue lesions in IgG4-RD patients, which may act on CD138+ plasma cells to promote the enrichment of CD138 + plasma cells (21). And APRIL increased in gastric MALT lymphoma, which may act on CD20+ B lymphocytes to promote CD20+ B lymphocyte proliferation (22). IgG4-RD could the potential to evolve into MALT lymphoma (23, 24). The association of IgG4-RD with MALT lymphoma has also been gradually noted and studied.

Therefore, we conducted this trial to investigate the expression and function of APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma.

2 Patients and methods

2.1 Patients information

We included lacrimal gland specimens from 15 cases of IgG4-ROD, 3 cases of MALT lymphoma, and 1 case of MALT lymphoma with elevated IgG4 levels, all of which were diagnosed through immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology. All patients underwent lacrimal gland lesion resection at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April 2022 to November 2023. Clinical data and fasting serum IgG4 levels in the morning before treatment were also collected. This study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital (Approval Number: 2022 Review 17789), and all patients provided informed consent.

IgG4-RD were diagnosed by the Japanese Study Group in 2014, as following: (1) imaging examination showed lacrimal gland enlargement; (2) histopathological characteristics are consistent with IgG4-RD; and (3) elevated serum IgG4 (25). According to these criteria, IgG4-RD was classified as definitive, probable and possible when patient fulfilled all three criteria, the first two criteria and the first and last criteria, respectively. In our study, definite and probable categories were taken to be IgG4-RD.

2.2 Paraffin tissue preparation

All the freshly obtained lacrimal tissue was processed into paraffin-embedded tissue, following a precise protocol. The detailed steps are outlined below: 1. After a 24-hour fixation period in a universal tissue fixation solution, the tissue was thoroughly rinsed with pure water. 2.Dehydration was achieved through sequential immersion in 70%, 80%, and 95% alcohol solutions, followed by anhydrous alcohol, with each step lasting for 2 hours. 3. The tissue sample was then purified using a 1:1 mixture of anhydrous alcohol and xylene. Subsequently, it was placed in xylene I and xylene II for 2 hours each, facilitating further clearing. 4. The transparently processed samples were individually immersed in three wax cups (labeled I, II, III) within a wax melting box maintained at 58°C. Each cup was utilized for 2 hours to ensure thorough wax infiltration. 5. Once fully impregnated with wax, the sample was positioned in melted pure paraffin for meticulous embedding. 6. Utilizing a paraffin microtome, the paraffin-embedded tissue was meticulously sectioned into 4-micron slices, ready for subsequent staining procedures.

2.3 Double immunofluorescence staining

For the IgG4-ROD lacrimal gland paraffin sections, CD138 and Aprily-8 double immunofluorescence staining was employed, while CD20 and Aprily-8 double immunofluorescence staining was used for the MALT lymphoma lacrimal gland paraffin sections. The specific steps are as follows:1.Dewaxing in a graded series of ethanol.2.Antigen retrieval was performed using pH 8.0 EDTA, followed by blocking the tissue sections with 3% BSA for 30 minutes.3.A mixture of the primary monoclonal rabbit antibody CD138 (1:500, Abcam, UK) or CD20 (1:10, Abcam, UK) and the second primary monoclonal mouse antibody Aprily-8 (1:100, Novus Biologicals, USA) was added and incubated overnight in a refrigerator at 4°C.4.The corresponding secondary antibody for CD138 or CD20 (Cy3-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG) and the secondary antibody for Aprily-8 (Alexa Fluor 488-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG) were added sequentially, incubating them in a 37°C incubator for 50 minutes, followed by several washes.5.The cell nuclei were re-stained with DAPI, and dropping tissue autofluorescence quencher (Servicebio, China), and the slides were then mounted.6.Each pathological section was photographed under an fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan), capturing three fields at ×200 magnification and three fields at ×400 magnification. CD138, CD20 cells, and APRIL areas were quantified using Aipathwell software (Servicebio, China).

2.4 Triple immunofluorescence staining

Paraffin sections of MALT lymphoma lacrimal glands with elevated IgG4 levels were subjected to CD20, CD138, and Aprily-8 triple immunofluorescence staining. The specific steps are as follows:1.Dewaxing in a graded series of ethanol.2.Antigen retrieval using pH 6.0 citrate buffer, and the endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation with 3%H2O2 at room temperature for 25 min.3.Blocking the sections with serum at room temperature for 30 minutes.4.Adding the primary monoclonal rabbit antibody CD20 (1:1000) and incubating overnight in a refrigerator at 4°C.5.Adding the corresponding secondary antibody (HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG), followed by incubation in a 37°C incubator for 50 minutes and several washes.6. Adding 50μL TSA (Tyramide signal amplification) (Servicebio, China)-555 dyeing solution to ensure complete tissue coverage, and incubate at room temperature for 10 min.7. Placing the tissue sections in a repair box filled with pH 6.0 citric acid repair solution (G1202) and heating in a microwave for 10 minutes. 8. Blocking the sections with serum at room temperature for 30 minutes. 9. Adding the second primary monoclonal rabbit antibody CD138 (1:5000) and incubating overnight in a refrigerator at 4°C.10. Adding the corresponding secondary antibody, followed by incubation in a 37°C incubator for 50 minutes and several washes.11. Adding 50μL TSA-488 dyeing solution to ensure complete tissue coverage, and incubate at room temperature for 10 min.12. Placing the tissue sections in a repair box filled with pH 6.0 citric acid repair solution and heating in a microwave for 10 minutes. 13. Blocking the sections with serum at room temperature for 30 minutes. 14.Adding the third primary monoclonal rabbit antibody Aprily-8 (1:1000) and incubating overnight in a refrigerator at 4°C.15.Adding the corresponding secondary antibody, followed by incubation in a 37°C incubator for 50 minutes and several washes.16. Adding 50μL TSA-647 dyeing solution to ensure complete tissue coverage, and incubate at room temperature for 10 min.17.Re-staining the cell nuclei with DAPI, and dropping tissue autofluorescence quencher, and finally mounting the slides.18.Each pathological section was photographed under an fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan), capturing three fields at ×200 magnification and three fields at ×400 magnification. CD138, CD20 cells, and APRIL areas were quantified using Aipathwell software (Servicebio, China).

2.5 Index of immunofluorescence staining

The immunofluorescence staining indexes recorded in this study are as follows: Red positive cells = total number of red positive cells in tissue area; Green positive area = green positive area in tissue area; Red positive rate = total number of red positive cells/total number of cells; Green positive rate = total green positive area/total area; Positive rate of colocalization = total number of colocalization/(total number of red positive cells + total area of green positive cells - total number of colocalization);Colocalization coincidence positive area = colocalization red and green coincidence yellow positive pixel area.

2.6 Statistic Analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Pearson correlation analysis was employed to assess the relationship between CD138, APRIL, and serum IgG4 levels. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, USA).

3 Results

3.1 Demographic characteristics

The mean age of patients with IgG4-ROD was 47.0 years, while that of patients with MALT lymphoma was 56.8 years. Among the IgG4-ROD patients, 60% were male, whereas 75% of MALT lymphoma patients were female. The mean duration of symptoms was 42.4 months for IgG4-ROD and 63.0 months for MALT (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of patients with IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma.

3.2 Expression of APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma patients

In the lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD patients, CD138 and secreted APRIL were highly expressed, with a mean of 1152.51 cells/HPF (range: 138.00–2678.00 cells/HPF) and a mean of 8471.12 pixels/HPF (range: 8.00–92794.00 pixels/HPF) (Figure 1). Notably, the positive rate for CD138 was 35.59% (range: 3.30–93.46%), while the positive rate for APRIL was 10.49% (range: 0.03–56.40%). In contrast, lacrimal gland lesions in MALT lymphoma patients exhibited high expression of CD20 and secreted APRIL, with a mean of 4109.44 cells/HPF (range: 2905.00–4927.00 cells/HPF) and a mean of 2950.78 pixels/HPF (range: 699.00–4541.00 pixels/HPF) (Figure 2). The positive rate for CD20 was 85.48% (range: 71.18–96.42%), while the positive rate for APRIL was 7.23% (range: 1.98–12.22%) (Table 2).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. CD138 (red) and Aprily-8 immunofluorescence staining secreted APRIL (green) in lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD patients (×200). APRIL, A proliferation-inducing ligand; IgG4-ROD, Immunoglobulin G4-related ophthalmic disease.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. CD20 (red) and Aprily-8 immunofluorescence staining secreted APRIL (green) in lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients (×200). APRIL, A proliferation-inducing ligand; MALT, Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Expressions of CD138 and APRIL, and CD20 and APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions in IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma patients, respectively.

3.3 Target cells of APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions of patients with IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma

Dual immunofluorescence staining revealed colocalization of CD138 and APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions of patients with IgG4-ROD (Figure 3). The positive rate for the co-localization of CD138 and APRIL was 8.83% (range: 0.15–45.44%), with the colocalization coincidence positive areas measuring 946.84 pixels/HPF (range: 3.00–7788.00 pixels/HPF). This indicates that secreted APRIL was primarily distributed near or on the infiltrated CD138+ plasma cells. In lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients, CD20 and APRIL were also found to be co-localized (Figure 4, Table 3). The positive rate for the co-localization of CD20 and APRIL was 7.04% (range: 1.27–12.51%), with colocalization coincidence positive areas of 949.78 pixels/HPF (range: 160.00–2122.00 pixels/HPF). This suggests that secreted APRIL is predominantly found near or on the infiltrated CD20+ plasma cells.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Double immunofluorescence staining (×400) of CD138 (red) and Aprily-8 (green) in lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD patients. White arrows show the co-localization of CD138 and secreted APRIL. IgG4-ROD, Immunoglobulin G4-related ophthalmic disease; APRIL, A proliferation-inducing ligand.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Double immunofluorescence staining (×400) of CD20 (red) and Aprily-8 (green) in lacrimal gland lesions in MALT lymphoma patients, with white arrows showing the co-localization of CD20 and secretory APRIL. MALT, Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; APRIL, A proliferation-inducing ligand.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Co-expression of CD138 and APRIL, and CD20 and APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions in IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma patients, respectively.

3.4 Expression of APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients with elevated IgG4

One patient with MALT lymphoma had a serum IgG4 level of 4.55g/L. In the patient’s lacrimal gland lesions, We observed high expression levels of CD20, CD138, and secreted APRIL. Specifically, the mean counts were 7436.67 cells/HPF (range: 6538.00–8060.00 cells/HPF) for CD20, 547.67 cells/HPF (range: 126.00–954.00 cells/HPF) for CD138, and an mean area of 1,428,066.33 pixels/HPF (range: 1,320,610.00–1,521,975.00 pixels/HPF) for secreted APRIL (Figure 5). Notably, triple immunofluorescence staining demonstrated the colocalization of CD20, CD138, and secreted APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients with elevated IgG4 (Figure 6).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. CD20 (red), CD138 (green), and Aprily-8 (pink) immunofluorescence staining (×200) of lacrimal gland lesions of MALT Lymphoma patients with elevated IgG4. MALT, Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; IgG4, Immunoglobulin G4.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Triple immunofluorescence staining (×400) of CD20 (red), CD138 (green), and Aprily-8 (pink) in lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients with elevated IgG4. White arrows show the co-localization of CD20, CD138, and secreted APRIL. MALT, Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; IgG4, Immunoglobulin G4.

3.5 Relationship between CD138, APRIL and serum IgG4 in lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD patients

In IgG4-ROD patients, serum IgG4 levels averaged 15.64 ± 5.22 g/L (range: 5.00 g/L - 23.79 g/L). In lacrimal gland lesions of these patients, we found that the expression of CD138 and the positive rate of CD138 were not related to the level of serum IgG4(95% CI: -0.52 to 0.50, r = -0.0107, P = 0.970; 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.75, r = 0.3808, P = 0.161; respectively) (Figures 7A, B). In contrast, the expression of secreted APRIL and the positive rate of secreted APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions showed a positive correlation with serum IgG4 levels (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.85, r = 0.5820, P = 0.029; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.87, r = 0.6261, P = 0.017; respectively) (Figures 7C, D). Furthermore, the positive rate of colocalization and the colocalization coincidence positive areas were positively correlated with serum IgG4 levels (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87, r = 0.6420, P = 0.013; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.84, r = 0.5673, P = 0.034; respectively) (Figures 7E, F).

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. (A-F) Relationship between CD138, APRIL and serum IgG4 in lacrimal gland lesions in IgG4-ROD patients. APRIL, A proliferation-inducing ligand; IgG4, Immunoglobulin G4; IgG4-ROD, Immunoglobulin G4-related ophthalmic disease.

4 Discussion

Numerous previous studies found that the increased expression of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-10, secreted by infiltration-induced, costimulatory molecule-positive regulatory T cells (26), M2 macrophages (7), and mast cells (27), may be associated with the immunoglobulin class switch to IgG4. Additionally, APRIL induced IgG4 and IgE class switching in the presence of IL-4 in vitro (28). However, the expression of APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions among patients with IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma has not been previously reported. Therefore, we investigated the expression of APRIL in these lesions using double and triple immunofluorescence staining.

In this study, we discovered a significant amount of secreted APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions of patients with IgG4-ROD. Antibodies against the extracellular portion of APRIL (amino acids 93-233) were released following proteolytic cleavage, allowing for the identification of APRIL cytokine target cells (29). We further observed that APRIL acted on certain CD138+ plasma cells, consistent with findings by Kawakami et al. (21). These results suggested that APRIL may be directly involved in the aggregation of plasma cells in IgG4-ROD lacrimal gland lesions. First of all, APRIL may bind to the BCMA and TACI receptors to trigger a variety of signaling pathways, such as the activation of cysteine-containing aspartic proteases or mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) or c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) or extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), NF-κB translocation (3032). Through the MAPK-ERK pathway, BCMA and TACI can prevent cell apoptosis and reduce the production of the pro-apoptotic protein Bim (33), leading to an increase in plasma cells. By activating ERK, p38, and JNK signaling pathways, along with the NF-κB classical pathway and the AKT/FOXO1 pathway, APRIL bound to HSPG receptors expressed on plasma cells, effectively transmitting signals that promote plasma cell longevity and survival (16, 17, 34). Additionally, increased BCMA expression, induced by gamma-secretase inhibitors, can also enhance plasma cell longevity and plasma blast survival (35, 36). And the high expression of TACI (37) on plasma cells may promote the expression of Blimp-1, which a key transcription factor involved in plasma cell development (38). Ultimately, these multiple pathways converged to facilitate the accumulation of plasma cells in the lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD patients. However, the mechanism by which APRIL promotes plasma cell aggregation in IgG4-ROD has not been fully elucidated and needs further exploration in the future.

Furthermore, we found a significant amount of secreted APRIL in lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients, consistent with the findings of Blosse et al. (22). Additionally, we discovered that APRIL acted on CD20+ B lymphocytes. These results suggested that APRIL could play a role in the regulation and development of B lymphocytes, with its overexpression potentially contributing to tumor-like proliferation of these cells. The specific mechanisms may involve APRIL binding to the BCMA receptor on the surface of B lymphocytes, which promoted their survival, maturation, and differentiation (39, 40). Furthermore, APRIL stimulated the NF-κB classical pathway (41) and maintains the expression of Blimp-1 (42) through the TACI receptor on B lymphocytes, facilitating their differentiation into long-lived antibody-secreting cells. This ultimately leads to tumor-like proliferation of B lymphocytes within the lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients. However, the mechanism by which APRIL promotes B-lymphocyte tumor-like proliferation in MALT lymphomas has not been fully elucidated and needs further exploration in the future.

In lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients with elevated IgG4, we observed significantly increased expression levels of CD20, CD138, and secreted APRIL. Through triple immunofluorescence staining, we found that APRIL acted on both CD20+ B lymphocytes and CD138+ plasma cells, leading to their proliferation. APRIL may have dual effects in these lesions, promoting both plasma cell proliferation and IgG4 production, as well as stimulating B lymphocyte proliferation.

In lacrimal gland lesions, IgG4-ROD could progress to MALT lymphoma, aligning with previous findings (23, 24). However, the mechanism of transformation from IgG4-ROD to MALT lymphoma needs further investigation.

This study also analyzed the relationship between CD138 levels, APRIL expression, and serum IgG4 levels in lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD patients. For the first time, we found a positive correlation between the expression level and positive rate of secreted APRIL and the serum IgG4 level in these lesions. Specifically, the positive rate and the colocalization of CD138 and APRIL were also positively correlated with serum IgG4 levels. This suggests that APRIL may enhance serum IgG4 secretion by acting on CD138+ plasma cells. After APRIL bound to HSPG, it activated two distinct signaling pathways via the TACI and BCMA receptors, which upregulated class switching of immunoglobulins and promoted the conversion of other immunoglobulin types (such as IgM and IgA) to IgG4 (17). Additionally, APRIL can prolong the lifespan of plasma cells (17, 18), leading to their aggregation and increased secretion of IgG4 upon interaction with CD138+ plasma cells, thereby elevating IgG4 levels.

This study has some limitations. First, the sample size of this study is small, and it is necessary to expand the sample size in the future to study the role of APRIL in IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma lacrimal gland lesions. Another limitation is that we have not yet verified the role of APRIL in IgG4-ROD and MAIL lymphoma. Therefore, further validation at both the cellular and animal levels is needed to comprehensively elucidate the role of APRIL in IgG4-ROD and MALT lymphoma lacrimal gland lesions and to identify new therapeutic targets for them.

In conclusion, APRIL is highly expressed in lacrimal gland lesions of IgG4-ROD patients, where it may act on CD138+ plasma cells to promote their enrichment and may also be associated with increased serum IgG4 levels. Additionally, APRIL is also highly expressed in lacrimal gland lesions of MALT lymphoma patients, potentially acting on CD20+ B lymphocytes to stimulate their proliferation. Ultimately, APRIL may play a role in the potential transformation of IgG4-ROD into MALT lymphoma.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Review Board of The West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

LH: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. YY: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. WH: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The Science and Technology Program of Chengdu City, Grant/Award Number:2021-YF05-00844-SN.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all the clinicians who helped in the data collection process.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1514003/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Wallace ZS, Perugino C, Matza M, Deshpande V, Sharma A, Stone JH. Immunoglobulin G4-related disease. Clin Chest Med. (2019) 40:583–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2019.05.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Zen Y, Fujii T, Harada K, Kawano M, Yamada K, Takahira M, et al. Th2 and regulatory immune reactions are increased in immunoglobin G4-related sclerosing pancreatitis and cholangitis. Hepatology. (2007) 45:1538–46. doi: 10.1002/hep.21697

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Akiyama M, Yasuoka H, Yamaoka K, Suzuki K, Kaneko Y, Kondo H, et al. Enhanced IgG4 production by follicular helper 2 T cells and the involvement of follicular helper 1 T cells in the pathogenesis of IgG4-related disease. Arthritis Res Ther. (2016) 18:167. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1064-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mattoo H, Mahajan VS, Maehara T, Deshpande V, Della-Torre E, Wallace ZS, et al. Clonal expansion of CD4(+) cytotoxic T Lymphocytes in patients with IgG4-related disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 138:825–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.12.1330

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mattoo H, Mahajan VS, Della-Torre E, Sekigami Y, Carruthers M, Wallace ZS, et al. De novo oligoclonal expansions of circulating plasmablasts in active and relapsing IgG4-related disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2014) 134:679–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Della-Torre E, Feeney E, Deshpande V, Mattoo H, Mahajan V, Kulikova M, et al. B-cell depletion attenuates serological biomarkers of fibrosis and myofibroblast activation in IgG4-related disease. Ann Rheum Dis. (2015) 74:2236–43. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205799

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Furukawa S, Moriyama M, Tanaka A, Maehara T, Tsuboi H, Iizuka M, et al. Preferential M2 macrophages contribute to fibrosis in IgG4-related dacryoadenitis and sialoadenitis, so-called Mikulicz’s disease. Clin Immunol. (2015) 156:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2014.10.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Stone JH, Zen Y, Deshpande V. IgG4-related disease. N Engl J Med. (2012) 366:539–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1104650

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Takeuchi M, Sato Y, Ohno K, Tanaka S, Takata K, Gion Y, et al. T helper 2 and regulatory T-cell cytokine production by mast cells: a key factor in the pathogenesis of IgG4-related disease. Mod Pathol. (2014) 27:1126–36. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.236

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Della-Torre E, Lanzillotta M, Doglioni C. Immunology of igg4-related disease. Clin Exp Immunol. (2015) 181:191–206. doi: 10.1111/cei.12641

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Deshpande V, Zen Y, Chan JK, Yi EE, Sato Y, Yoshino T, et al. Consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4 related disease. Mod Pathol. (2012) 25:1181–92. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.72

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Sato Y, Notohara K, Kojima M, Takata K, Masaki Y, Yoshino T. IgG4-related disease: historical overview and pathology of hematological disorders. Pathol Int. (2010) 60:247–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02524.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Min HK, Lee YS, Yang SW, Lee J, Kwok SK, Ju JH, et al. Clinical outcomes and pathological characteristics of immunoglobulin G4-related ophthalmic disease versus orbital inflammatory pseudotumor. Korean J Intern Med. (2019) 34:220–6. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2016.304

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Huard B, McKee T, Bosshard C, Durual S, Matthes T, Myit S, et al. APRIL secreted by neutrophils binds to heparan sulfate proteoglycans to create plasma cell niches in human mucosa. J Clin Invest. (2008) 18:2887–95. doi: 10.1172/JCI33760

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Stein JV, López-Fraga M, Elustondo FA, Carvalho-Pinto CE, Rodríguez D, Gómez-Caro R, et al. APRIL modulates B and T cell immunity. J Clin Invest. (2002) 109:1587–98. doi: 10.1172/JCI15034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Kaya G, Sauter G, McKee T, Donze O, Schwaller J, et al. The source of APRIL up-regulation in human solid tumor lesions. J Leukoc Biol. (2006) 80:697–704. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1105655

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Vincent FB, Morand EF, Schneider P, Mackay F. The BAFF/APRIL system in SLE pathogenesis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2014) 10:365–73. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.33

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Yu G, Boone T, Delaney J, Hawkins N, Kelley M, Ramakrishnan M, et al. APRIL and TALL-I and receptors BCMA and TACI: system for regulating humoral immunity. Nat Immunol. (2000) 1:252–6. doi: 10.1038/79802

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Ingold K, Zumsteg A, Tardivel A, Huard B, Steiner QG, Cachero TG, et al. Identification of proteoglycans as the APRIL specific binding partners. J Exp Med. (2005) 201:1375–83. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042309

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hendriks J, Planelles L, de-Jong-Odding J, Hardenberg G, Pals ST, Hahne M, et al. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding promotes APRIL-induced tumor cell proliferation. Cell Death Differ. (2005) 12:637–48. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401647

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Kawakami T, Mizushima I, Yamada K, Fujii H, Ito K, Yasuno T, et al. Abundant a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL)-producing macrophages contribute to plasma cell accumulation in immunoglobulin G4-related disease. Nephrol Dial Transpl. (2019) 34:960–9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy296

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Blosse A, Peru S, Levy M, Marteyn B, Floch P, Sifré E, et al. APRIL−producing eosinophils are involved in gastric MALT lymphomagenesis induced by Helicobacter sp infection. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:14858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71792-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Cheuk W, Yuen HK, Chan AC, Shih LY, Kuo TT, Ma MW, et al. Ocular adnexal lymphoma associated with IgG4+ chronic sclerosing dacryoadenitis: a previously undescribed complication of IgG4-related sclerosing disease. Am J Surg Pathol. (2008) 32:1159–67. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31816148ad

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Carruthers MN, Khosroshahi A, Augustin T, Deshpande V, Stone JH. The diagnostic utility of serum IgG4 concentrations in IgG4-related disease. Ann Rheum Dis. (2015) 74:14–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204907

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Goto H, Takahira M, Azumi A. Diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related ophthalmic disease. Jpn J Ophthalmol. (2015) 59:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s10384-014-0352-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kusuda T, Uchida K, Miyoshi H, Koyabu M, Satoi S, Takaoka M, et al. Involvement of inducible costimulatory- and interleukin 10-positive regulatory T cells in the development of IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreas. (2011) 40:1120–30. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31821fc796

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Takeuchi M, Ohno K, Takata K, Gion Y, Tachibana T, Orita Y, et al. Interleukin 13-positive mast cells are increased in immunoglobulin G4-related sialadenitis. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:7696. doi: 10.1038/srep07696

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Litinskiy MB, Nardelli B, Hilbert DM, He B, Schaffer A, Casali P, et al. DCs induce CD40-independent immunoglobulin class switching through BLyS and APRIL. Nat Immunol. (2002) 3:822–9. doi: 10.1038/ni829

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Schwaller J, Schneider P, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, McKee T, Myit S, Matthes T, et al. Neutrophil-derived APRIL concentrated in tumor lesions by proteoglycans correlates with human B-cell lymphoma aggressiveness. Blood. (2007) 109:331–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-02-001800

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Hatzoglou A, Roussel J, Bourgeade MF, Rogier E, Madry C, Inoue J, et al. TNF receptor family member BCMA (B cell maturation) associates with TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 and activates NF-kappa B, elk-1, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Immunol. (2000) 165:1322–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.3.1322

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Bossen C, Schneider P. BAFF, APRIL and their receptors: structure, function and signaling. Semin Immunol. (2006) 18:263–75. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.04.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Mackay F, Schneider P, Rennert P, Browning J. BAFF and APRIL: a tutorial on B cell survival. Annu Rev Immunol. (2003) 21:231–64. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141152

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Craxton A, Draves KE, Gruppi A, Clark EA. BAFF regulates B cell survival by down regulating the BH3-only family member bim via the ERK pathway. J Exp Med. (2005) 202:1363–74. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051283

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bret C, Hose D, Reme T, Sprynski AC, Mahtouk K, Schved JF, et al. Expression of genes encoding for proteins involved in heparan sulphate and chondroitin sulphate chain synthesis and modification in normal and Malignant plasma cells. Br J Haematol. (2009) 145:350–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07633.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Laurent SA, Hoffmann FS, Kuhn PH, Cheng Q, Chu Y, Schmidt-Supprian M, et al. [amp]]gamma;-Secretase directly sheds the survival receptor BCMA from plasma cells. Nat Commun. (2015) 6:7333. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8333

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Stephenson S, Care MA, Doody GM, Tooze RM. APRIL drives a coordinated but diverse response as a foundation for plasma cell longevity. J Immunol. (2022) 209:926–37. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100623

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ng LG, Sutherland AP, Newton R, Qian F, Cachero TG, Scott ML, et al. B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF family (BAFF)-R is the principal BAFF receptor facilitating BAFF costimulation of circulating T and B cells. J Immunol. (2004) 173:807–17. doi: 10.4049/jimm-unol.173.2.807

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Tsuji S, Cortesão C, Bram RJ, Platt JL, Cascalho M. TACI deficiency impairs sustained Blimp-1 expression in B cells decreasing long-lived plasma cells in the bone marrow. Blood. (2011) 118:5832–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-353961

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Moore PA, Belvedere O, Orr A, Pieri K, LaFleur DW, Feng P, et al. BLyS: member of the tumor necrosis factor family and B lymphocyte stimulator. Science. (1999) 285:260–3. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5425.260

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Laabi Y, Gras MP, Brouet JC, Berger R, Larsen CJ, Tsapis A. The BCMA gene, preferentially expressed during B lymphoid maturation, is bidirectionally transcribed. Nucleic Acids Res. (1994) 22:1147–54. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.7.1147

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Ozaki K, Spolski R, Ettinger R, Kim HP, Wang G, Qi CF, et al. Regulation of B cell differentiation and plasma cell generation by IL-21, a novel inducer of Blimp-1 and Bcl-6. J Immunol. (2004) 173:5361–71. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5361

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Xia XZ, Treanor J, Senaldi G, Khare SD, Boone T, Kelley M, et al. TACI is a TRAF-interacting receptor for TALL-1, a tumor necrosis factor family member involved in B cell regulation. J Exp Med. (2000) 192:137–43. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.1.137

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: lacrimal gland, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD), a proliferation inducing ligand (APRIL), immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)

Citation: He L, Zhan L, Yang Y and He W (2025) Similarities and differences of a proliferation-inducing ligand expression in lacrimal gland lesions of patients with IgG4-associated ophthalmic diseases and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Front. Immunol. 16:1514003. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1514003

Received: 19 October 2024; Accepted: 31 January 2025;
Published: 18 February 2025.

Edited by:

Efstathia K. Kapsogeorgou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Reviewed by:

Loukas Chatzis, Laiko General Hospital of Athens, Greece
Stefano Mocci, University of Cagliari, Italy

Copyright © 2025 He, Zhan, Yang and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Weimin He, aGV3bTg4OEBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more