Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1509886
This article is part of the Research Topic Immunology and Immunotherapy of Skin Cancer View all 14 articles

Treatment at the end of life in patients with advanced melanoma. A multicenter DeCOG study of 1067 patients from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg

Provisionally accepted
Andrea Forschner Andrea Forschner 1*Katharina C Kähler Katharina C Kähler 2Martin Gschnell Martin Gschnell 3Ewan A Langan Ewan A Langan 4,5Carsten Weishaupt Carsten Weishaupt 6Frank Meiss Frank Meiss 7Kai-Martin Thoms Kai-Martin Thoms 8Renate U Wahl Renate U Wahl 9Daniela Göppner Daniela Göppner 10Marlene Garzarolli Marlene Garzarolli 11Michael Sachse Michael Sachse 12Max Schlaak Max Schlaak 13Markus Reitmajer Markus Reitmajer 1Ivonne Kellner Ivonne Kellner 14Anja Gesierich Anja Gesierich 15Peter Mohr Peter Mohr 16Friedegund Meier Friedegund Meier 11Imke von Wasielewski Imke von Wasielewski 17Rudolf Herbst Rudolf Herbst 14Jochen Utikal Jochen Utikal 18,19,20Claudia Pföhler Claudia Pföhler 21Jens Ulrich Jens Ulrich 22Patrick Terheyden Patrick Terheyden 23Martin Kaatz Martin Kaatz 24Sebastian Haferkamp Sebastian Haferkamp 25Ulrike Leiter Ulrike Leiter 1Selma Ugurel Selma Ugurel 26Michael Weichenthal Michael Weichenthal 2Carola Berking Carola Berking 27Ralf Gutzmer Ralf Gutzmer 28Dirk Schadendorf Dirk Schadendorf 26Lena Nanz Lena Nanz 29Carmen Loquai Carmen Loquai 30
  • 1 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • 2 Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kiel, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
  • 3 Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Hesse, Germany
  • 4 Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
  • 5 Dermatological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 6 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • 7 Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • 8 Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • 9 Department of Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • 10 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany
  • 11 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • 12 Department of Dermatology, Hospital of Bremerhaven, Bremerhaven, Germany
  • 13 Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
  • 14 Department of Dermatology, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
  • 15 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • 16 Elbe Kliniken, Buxtehude, Germany
  • 17 Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
  • 18 Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 19 Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
  • 20 DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
  • 21 Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
  • 22 Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center Harz Clinics, Quedlinburg, Germany
  • 23 Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
  • 24 SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbH, Gera, Germany
  • 25 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany
  • 26 Essen University Hospital, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
  • 27 Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
  • 28 Department of Dermatology, Muehlenkreiskliniken Minden and Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
  • 29 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  • 30 Department of Dermatology, Gesundheit Nord Klinikverbund Bremen, Bremen, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Although systemic therapies have improved considerably over the last decade, up to 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma still die due to disease progression. Oncological treatment at the end-of-life phase is challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and type of systemic therapy received by melanoma patients in their end-of-life phase. Methods: Patients with metastatic melanoma who had died between January 1, 2018 and October 31, 2022 were identified from the prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOReg. Study endpoints were percentage of patients who had been treated with systemic therapy within the last three months of life, timepoint of initiation of the last-line therapy, overall survival, treatment benefit and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events.Results In total, 1067 patients from 46 skin cancer centers were included. Most of the patients (63%) had received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as last-line therapy, 22% targeted therapies (TT) and 12% chemotherapy (CTX). Comparing last-line ICI and TT, patients with TT were significantly more likely to benefit from treatment and had significantly fewer and milder treatment-related AE than patients with ICI. Even though two thirds of patients had received ICI as a last-line therapy, the majority of these patients (61%) had stopped therapy within the last 30 days of life, whereas the majority of patients with TT (66%) still continued their treatment to the end of life. We found markedly fewer patients with initiation of ICI within 30 days before their death (19%) compared to a historic cohort including patients who died in 2016 or 2017 (39%).Conclusion: Treatment approaches near the end of life have markedly changed in skin cancer centers in Germany over recent years, with ICI prescribed less frequently in the end-of-life phase. In contrast, TT are frequently administered, even within the last 30 days of life. It should also be considered that discontinuation of TT can result in rapid tumour progression. Due to the oral administration and a low rate of severe toxicity, TT appear to be a suitable treatment option, even in the end-of-life situation of melanoma patients

    Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitors, Melanoma, ipilimumab, Nivolumab, BRAF and MEK inhibitors, End of Life

    Received: 11 Oct 2024; Accepted: 27 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Forschner, Kähler, Gschnell, Langan, Weishaupt, Meiss, Thoms, Wahl, Göppner, Garzarolli, Sachse, Schlaak, Reitmajer, Kellner, Gesierich, Mohr, Meier, von Wasielewski, Herbst, Utikal, Pföhler, Ulrich, Terheyden, Kaatz, Haferkamp, Leiter, Ugurel, Weichenthal, Berking, Gutzmer, Schadendorf, Nanz and Loquai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Andrea Forschner, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tuebingen, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.