data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1501275
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Clinical trials do not typically assess underlying molecular mechanisms of vaccine immunogenicity or reactogenicity. We evaluated the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of 4 mRNA vaccines and potential contributing mechanisms and identified shared and unique clinical and immunologic features. Methods: This ongoing open-label, phase 1 trial randomized healthy adults (18-75 years) to receive a single dose of mRNA-1273.222 (bivalent COVID-19), mRNA-1345 (RSV), mRNA-1010 (influenza), and FLUAD (active influenza comparator) or 2 or 3 doses of mRNA-1647 (CMV). The primary objective was to assess the safety and reactogenicity of each study vaccine, with humoral immunogenicity (neutralizing antibody [nAb] responses) as the secondary objective. This interim analysis reports safety and reactogenicity in all study vaccines and humoral immunogenicity in singledose vaccines (mRNA-1273.222, mRNA-1345, mRNA-1010, and FLUAD). Exploratory objectives included antigen-specific T-cell responses after single-dose mRNA-1345 or mRNA-1273.222, and soluble mediators of inflammation and innate immunity following vaccination in single-dose vaccine groups and two doses of mRNA-1647. Results: At the interim analysis data cutoff (February 1, 2023), 302 participants received 1 dose of the study vaccines. Reactogenicity exhibited a consistent trend across vaccine groups; most solicited local and systemic adverse reactions within 7 days were mild or moderate in severity. There were no deaths or serious, severe, or treatment-related adverse events leading to study discontinuation. At Day 29, nAb titers against vaccine-specific antigens increased 2-to 8-fold versus baseline for all singledose vaccine groups. In an exploratory analysis, mRNA-1273.222 and mRNA-1345 induced antigenspecific Th1-biased CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell responses at Day 29. The cytokine response analysis showed increased levels of IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-2Ra, CXCL9, IP-10, MCP-2, and MIP-1β on Day 2 following vaccination, with generally greater increases observed with mRNA vaccines versus FLUAD. Regardless of age and across mRNA vaccine groups, peak serum levels of IL-1Ra and MCP-1/MCP-2 on Day 2 weakly correlated with systemic reactogenicity scores (correlation coefficient range: 0.15-0.27).The 4 mRNA vaccines had acceptable reactogenicity, demonstrated changes in serum biomarkers of innate immune activation, and were immunogenic. This suggests that the observed reactogenicity of mRNA vaccines may be related to shared features of the mRNA platform (LNP platform).
Keywords: mRNA vaccines, Safety, Immunogenicity, T cells, immune response Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05397223
Received: 24 Sep 2024; Accepted: 20 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Paris, Fierro, Sanchez, Makrinos, Zhang, Sun, Rohilla, Girard, Adeniji and DiPiazza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Robert M Paris, Moderna Inc, Cambridge, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.