ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1486799

This article is part of the Research TopicBreakthroughs in Immune Checkpoint Therapy: Overcoming Resistance with Novel TechniquesView all articles

The bispecific antibody targeting VISTA and PD-L1 shows enhanced tumor inhibitory activity in pancreatic, endometrial and breast cancers compared to mono-and combination immune checkpoint blockade

Provisionally accepted
Przemysław  BielskiPrzemysław Bielski1,2Jan  BarczyńskiJan Barczyński1Michał  MikitiukMichał Mikitiuk1Maja  MyrchaMaja Myrcha1Urszula  TyrchaUrszula Tyrcha1Aleksandra  Hec-GałązkaAleksandra Hec-Gałązka1Tad  A. HolakTad A. Holak1Tomasz  SitarTomasz Sitar1*
  • 1Recepton Sp. z o.o., Gdańsk, Poland
  • 2Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Lesser Poland, Poland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The introduction of checkpoint immunotherapeutic agents in the last decade has revolutionized cancer treatment. Although anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 are promising therapies, many patients fail to respond or relapse due to drug resistance potentially due to redundancy of immune checkpoints. One of the ways to improve the efficacy of this cancer treatment is to target two or even three immune checkpoints. To date, the benefit of combined anti-VISTA/anti-PD-L1 therapy has been confirmed, but no one has investigated the efficacy of blocking these negative immune checkpoints with a bispecific anti-VISTA/anti-PD-L1 antibody.Methods: In this study, the bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) were produced in three formats: symmetric (IgG-HC-scFv), asymmetric (Fab-scFv-Fc(KIH)) and 2 x scFv. The binding and blocking properties of these bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) and their efficacy compared to monotherapy and combination therapy were then determined using endometrial (RL95-2), pancreatic (PANC-1) and breast (BT-20) cancer cell lines.The bsAbs generated in this study showed weaker binding properties to PD-1 and VISTA in ELISA (EC50) than the parent antibodies (atezolizumab and onvatilimab). Blockade of VISTA/VSIG-3 binding was also weaker with bsAbs compared to onvatilimab, but the ability to block the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway was slightly better than with atezolizumab. The Fc-based bsAbs showed statistically significant higher levels of lysis of endometrial, breast and pancreatic cancer cells. The symmetric bsAbs (IgG-HC-scFv) showed the most promising therapeutic potential. Higher levels of cancer cell lysis were associated with higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Both the asymmetric and symmetric bsAbs resulted in higher secretion levels of IFN-γ, TNFα and Granzyme B than anti-VISTA, anti-PD-L1 monotherapy and anti-VISTA/anti-PD-L1 combination therapy.The high level of tumor cell lysis and increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by the Fc-based bsAbs suggest a novel approach for the treatment of pancreatic, endometrial and breast cancer.

Keywords: Vista, PD-L1, PD-1, Bispecific, Antibodies, combination therapy, Cancer

Received: 26 Aug 2024; Accepted: 25 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bielski, Barczyński, Mikitiuk, Myrcha, Tyrcha, Hec-Gałązka, Holak and Sitar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tomasz Sitar, Recepton Sp. z o.o., Gdańsk, Poland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more