Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1509782

Mass cytometry: exploring the immune landscape of systemic autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in the past fourteen years

Provisionally accepted
Aïcha Kante Aïcha Kante 1,2,3Mathieu F Chevalier Mathieu F Chevalier 2,4*Damien Sene Damien Sene 2,3*Jeanne Chauffier Jeanne Chauffier 2,3*Stephane Mouly Stephane Mouly 3,5*Glenn Benjamin Chousterman Glenn Benjamin Chousterman 6,7Feriel Azibani Feriel Azibani 6*Benjamin Terrier Benjamin Terrier 8,9*Theo Pezel Theo Pezel 10,6*Cloé Comarmond Cloé Comarmond 2,3*
  • 1 Université Paris Cité, Paris, Île-de-France, France
  • 2 INSERM U976 HIPI Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy, Paris, France
  • 3 Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
  • 4 Institut de Recherche Saint Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
  • 5 INSERM U1144 Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie, Paris, Île-de-France, France
  • 6 INSERM U942 Biomarqueurs Cardioneurovasculaires, Paris, Île-de-France, France
  • 7 Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
  • 8 Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
  • 9 INSERM U970 Paris Centre de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (PARCC), Paris, Île-de-France, France
  • 10 Département de cardiologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Auto-immune and inflammatory diseases are heterogenous in their clinical manifestations and prognosis, even among individuals presenting with the same pathology. Understanding the immunological alterations involved in their pathogenesis provides valuable insights in different clinical phenotypes and treatment responses. Immunophenotyping could lead to significant improvements in diagnosis, monitoring, initial treatment decisions and follow-up in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Mass cytometry provides measurement of over 40 simultaneous cellular parameters at single-cell resolution, and therefore holds immense potential to evaluate complex cellular systems and for high-dimensional single-cell analysis. The high dimensionality of mass cytometry provides better coverage of immune populations dynamics, with sufficient power to identify rare cell types compared to flow cytometry. In this comprehensive review, we explore how mass cytometry findings contributed in the past decade to a deeper understanding of the cellular actors involved in systemic auto-immune and auto-inflammatory diseases with their respective therapeutic and prognostic impact. We also delve into the bioinformatical approaches applied to mass cytometry to analyze the high volumes of data generated, as well as the impact of the use of complementary single cell RNA sequencing, and their spatial modalities. Our analysis highlights the fact that mass cytometry captures major information on cell populations providing insights on the complex pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Future research designs could include mass cytometry findings in association to other -omics to stratify patients in adequate therapeutic arms and provide advancements in personalized therapies in the field of auto-immune and inflammatory diseases.

    Keywords: mass cytometry, cyTOF, imaging mass cytometry, systemic autoimmune diseases, systemic inflammatory diseases, single-cell

    Received: 11 Oct 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kante, Chevalier, Sene, Chauffier, Mouly, Chousterman, Azibani, Terrier, Pezel and Comarmond. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Mathieu F Chevalier, Institut de Recherche Saint Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, 75010, France
    Damien Sene, INSERM U976 HIPI Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy, Paris, France
    Jeanne Chauffier, INSERM U976 HIPI Human Immunology, Pathophysiology, Immunotherapy, Paris, France
    Stephane Mouly, INSERM U1144 Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie, Paris, 75006, Île-de-France, France
    Feriel Azibani, INSERM U942 Biomarqueurs Cardioneurovasculaires, Paris, 75475, Île-de-France, France
    Benjamin Terrier, Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, 75014, France
    Theo Pezel, INSERM U942 Biomarqueurs Cardioneurovasculaires, Paris, 75475, Île-de-France, France
    Cloé Comarmond, Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, 75010, France

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.