Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Immunol., 23 September 2024
Sec. B Cell Biology
This article is part of the Research Topic Community Series in Mouse Models of B Cell Malignancies: Volume 2 View all 5 articles

Editorial: Community series in mouse models of B cell malignancies, volume II

  • 1Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sols-Morreale CSIC-UAM, Madrid, Spain
  • 2Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Paz (IdIPAZ), Madrid, Spain
  • 3UMR CNRS 7276/INSERM U1262 CRIBL, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
  • 4Hematology Laboratory of Dupuytren, Hospital University Center (CHU) of Limoges, Limoges, France

B-cell malignancies are a diverse group of cancers that originate from B lymphocytes at different developmental and differentiation stages exhibiting distinctive progression patterns and symptoms. Prognosis depends on the histological type, disease stage, and available treatment (reviewed in (13). In the last decades, advances in medical research have significantly improved the outcomes for these patients. However, a deeper knowledge on the origin, progression, and development of refractoriness and relapse is needed for providing patients with new treatments with better remission rates or longer progression-free survival. In addition, tools allowing a more accurate preclinical prediction on how new therapeutic approaches would work in clinics are also needed.

In this regard, mouse models of B cell malignancies are still indispensable for advancing our knowledge of B-cell hematological diseases. These models allow researchers to study the development, progression, and treatment of diseases in a controlled environment similar to that of the patient. Mice can be genetically modified to mimic human diseases, providing valuable information about the genetic factors involved in B-cell malignancies. Additionally, they help to understand the role of the immune system in these diseases, including how B cells interact with other immune cells and with the microenvironment cells and stroma. They are also important tools to test new therapies before clinical trials, ensuring safety and efficacy, as well as to reveal the underlying mechanisms of disease progression and treatment resistance.

In this Volume 2, three reviews and one perspective addressing mouse models of leukemia and lymphomas are included, providing a valuable extension to the Volume 1 of the collection (ISSN 1664-8714).

Bertilaccio and Chen contribute an interesting viewpoint on several genetic engineered mouse models (GEMMs) and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Richter’s syndrome (RS), pointing out the difficulty to obtain models recapitulating the high variability observed in CLL patients. Also, they reflect the importance of the tumor microenvironment in the maintenance and proliferation of CLL cells and how this can affect the progression into more aggressive forms such as RS and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-RS.

Also focused on leukemia, Casado-García et al. follow the “two-step” model of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) proposed by Greaves (4) to discuss about the genetic and environmental factors leading to childhood B-ALL. They also review the B-ALL mouse models available to study this disease focusing on the “two-step” model. B-ALL development requires an initial genetic alteration to produce preleukemic clones already in uterus. However, only a percentage of children in this preleukemic state will develop B-ALL after exposing to certain environmental factors, such as infections, ion radiations or gut microbiome alterations. The authors highlight the difficulty of introducing a controlled environmental risk factor that reproducibly triggers childhood B-ALL in the available mouse models of this disease.

Tabatabai et al. present an in-depth and comprehensive review recapitulating various genetic mouse models of DLBCL. DLBCL is a highly heterogeneous hematological disease that has been recently divided into 5 clusters based on genomic analyses (5). Authors provide a detailed review attending to this classification. They discuss the distinct mutations characteristic of each cluster and the existing mouse models of each type. They propose several innovative ideas for future models that could more accurately capture the heterogeneity of this disease.

Finally, Li et al. present a perspective based on their previous research (6) on lymphoma dissemination in mouse models of B-cell aggressive lymphomas. They suggest that extranodal spread of lymphoma is the result of lymphoma cells losing their homing ability to lymphoid organs, rather than gaining the ability to target non-lymphoid organs. This hypothesis is based on the identification by the authors of mouse lymphoma cell lines stablished from mouse models of lymphoma that, once transplanted to mice, fail to migrate to lymphoid nodes and are only able to metastasize to distinct non-lymphoid organs (6).

In summary, the articles in this volume 2 provide a deep and updated review on the pathophysiology of CLL, DLBCL and B-ALL and a challenging perspective on the mechanism of lymphoma dissemination. Overall, these articles highlight the essential role of genetically modified mice in understanding all aspects of B cell lymphoma and leukemia.

Author contributions

GP-C: Writing – original draft. CV-F: Writing – review & editing. JZ: Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

GP-C and JMZ were supported by a grant from the Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (PID2022-136909OB-I00). CV-F was supported by the International Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Fundation, the “Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur la cancer” and the “Ligue contre le cancer comités Haute-Vienne et Creuse”.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Alaggio R, Amador C, Anagnostopoulos I, Attygalle AD, Barreto de Oliveira Araujo I, Berti E, et al. The 5th edition of the world health organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: lymphoid neoplasms. Leukemia. (2022) 36:1720–48. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Küppers R. Mechanisms of B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. (2005) 5:251–62. doi: 10.1038/nrc1589

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shaffer AL 3rd, RM Y, Staudt LM. Pathogenesis of human B cell lymphomas. Annu Rev Immunol. (2012) 30:565–610. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Greaves M. A causal mechanism for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer. (2018) 18:471–84. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0015-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Chapuy B, Stewart C, Dunford AJ, Kim J, Kamburov A, Redd RA, et al. Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes. Nat Med. (2018) 24:679–90. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0016-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Li X, Deng M, Zhang C, Luo L, Qjan H. Establishment of a primary renal lymphoma and its clinical relevance. Front Oncol. (2023) 13:1089187. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1089187

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: genetically engineered mouse models, GEMM, B cell malignancies, mouse lymphoma, mouse leukemia, B cell neoplasms, CLL, DLBCL

Citation: Perez-Chacon G, Vincent-Fabert C and Zapata JM (2024) Editorial: Community series in mouse models of B cell malignancies, volume II. Front. Immunol. 15:1488601. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1488601

Received: 30 August 2024; Accepted: 12 September 2024;
Published: 23 September 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Harry W Schroeder, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States

Copyright © 2024 Perez-Chacon, Vincent-Fabert and Zapata. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Gema Perez-Chacon, gpchacon@iib.uam.es

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.