Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Immunol., 09 September 2024
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
This article is part of the Research Topic Novel Approaches for Immunotherapy of Lymphoma View all 6 articles

Corrigendum: Good manufacturing practice-grade generation of CD19 and CD123-specific CAR-T cells using piggyBac transposon and allogeneic feeder cells in patients diagnosed with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia

  • 1Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czechia
  • 2Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 2 as published. The description under Figure 2A was displayed as “PBMC:feeder ratio”.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The effects of the feeder on the quality of the produced CAR19 and CAR123 T cells. (A) The PBMCs from B-NHL patients (n=3) were electroporated with CAR19 transposon and mixed with decreasing amounts of the feeder. The number of CAR+ T cells was determined after 14 days of expansion as a yield per one ELP. The optimal adequate amount of the feeder improving the CAR-T production was estimated to be at a 1:3 feeder: PBMCs ratio. (B, C) The concentration of the transposon DNA during electroporation influences the vector copy number (VCN) and the percentage of transfected T cells. The optimal concentration of the transposon vector to meet the VCN limits=5 and to enable effective transfection was determined to be 10 µg/ml (n=3). (D) The graph presents the median number and range of CD3+ T lymphocytes in blood samples used for low-scale production of CAR-T cells obtained from B-NHL and AML patients (n=10). Both groups of patients were lymphopenic as a result of previous chemotherapies. (E) To evaluate the effects of the feeder on the transposition efficiency, we measured the vector copy number (VCN) per one CAR19+ and CAR123+ T cell in the presence or absence of the feeder (vector concentration =10 µg/ml, PBMCs were obtained from B-NHL and AML patients (n=4)). The differences in VCN were insignificant due to the high variability of the VCN in CAR-T expanded without the feeder. However, all products expanded in the presence of the feeder had acceptable VCN (≤5). (F) The biological activity of produced CAR-T in the presence or absence of the feeder was determined by cytotoxic assay against RAMOS cells (CAR19) or THP-1 cells (CAR123) at 1:1 effector: target ratio after 24 hours of co-culture - no significant differences in the cytotoxicity between feeder/no-feeder produced CAR19, and CAR123 T cells were observed (n=4, nd = no difference, unpaired t test). (G) The T cell memory phenotype was determined to evaluate the effects of chemotherapies on the quality of T cells by staining for antigens CD45RA and CD62L on CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Patient-derived samples contained significantly fewer CD45RA+CD62L+ T cells and significantly more T cells having more differentiated phenotype CD45RA-CD62L- in both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets, reflecting the patients' conditions. B-NHL n=8, AML n=10, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, nd = no difference, +/- SD, unpaired t test.

Correct description is “Feeder: PBMC ratio”.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: CAR-T cells, leukemia, lymphoma, electroporation, PiggyBac PB transposon

Citation: Mucha M, Štach M, Kaštánková I, Rychlá J, Vydra J, Lesný P and Otáhal P (2024) Corrigendum: Good manufacturing practice-grade generation of CD19 and CD123-specific CAR-T cells using piggyBac transposon and allogeneic feeder cells in patients diagnosed with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia. Front. Immunol. 15:1483043. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1483043

Received: 19 August 2024; Accepted: 21 August 2024;
Published: 09 September 2024.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2024 Mucha, Štach, Kaštánková, Rychlá, Vydra, Lesný and Otáhal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Pavel Otáhal, otahal@uhkt.cz

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.