Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1475478
This article is part of the Research Topic Autoantibodies and autoimmune neuromuscular disorders View all articles

Case Report: Target antigen and subclass switch in a patient with Autoimmune Nodopathy

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • 2 Neurologische Praxis Dres. Wessely, Menden, Germany
  • 3 Institute of Clinical Neurobiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Autoimmune Nodopathy (AN) is a new entity in the field of peripheral neuropathies and is defined by the presence of auto-antibodies against structures of the node of Ranvier combined with specific clinico-pathophysiological features and therapy response in affected patients. The targetspecific antibodies do not only serve as diagnostic biomarkers but also for treatment evaluation during follow-up.Case report: We report a 66-year-old female patient with various autoimmune diseases, including a history of membranous glomerulonephritis who presented with acute-onset, sensorimotor tetraparesis, cranial nerve involvement, and mild respiratory insufficiency. Under the suspicion of Guillain-Barré syndrome, she received intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and achieved remission. Eight months later, she relapsed with now poor response to IVIg, and developed additional features such as severe sensory ataxia, tremor, and neuropathic pain. Anti-contactin-1 IgG2 antibodies were detected and the diagnosis was reverted to AN. Plasma exchange and rituximab treatment led to a serological remission and corresponding significant clinical improvement, and therapy was paused. Two years after symptom onset, her condition worsened again with sensorimotor symptoms, and severe neuropathic pain, despite seronegativity for contactin-1. However, serum binding assays to teased nerve fiber staining showed recurring antibody reactivity against paranodal structures. Caspr-1 was identified as a new target antigen via cell-based assay, and high-titer antibodies of the IgG4 subclass were confirmed via ELISA. Hence, a new cycle of plasma exchange and regular rituximab treatment was initiated, with subsequent clinical improvement and serological remission. Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNFL) levels were assessed retrospectively and rose and fell together with the antibody titer.Discussion: This case demonstrates that autoimmunity to (para)nodal structures can reoccur especially in patients prone to autoimmune disorders, and can switch its target antigen and subclass in the course of disease. The presence of auto-antibodies against different targets at the node of Ranvier has direct implications for therapeutic management. We suggest a close follow-up of patients with AN after successful therapy. In case of deterioration despite seronegativity, non-specific tests such as teased fiber assays and repeated screening for different target antigens should be considered.

    Keywords: Autoimmune nodopathy, node of Ranvier, Neuropathy, auto-antibody, contactin-1, biomarker, neurofilament light chain, case report

    Received: 03 Aug 2024; Accepted: 12 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Appeltshauser, Glenewinkel, Rohrbacher, Wessely, Villmann, Sommer and Doppler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Luise Appeltshauser, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.