Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1466310
This article is part of the Research Topic Overcoming Therapeutic Resistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma View all 3 articles

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors plus Chemotherapy vs Targeted Therapy plus Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LA HPSCC)

Provisionally accepted
  • Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy, preservation of laryngeal function, and safety differences between PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, and targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy in LA HPSCC patients.This was a retrospective analysis of patients with LA HPSCC treated at Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from October, 2020 to March, 2024. A total of 110 eligible patients were included, 56 in the PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy group (Group A), and 54 in the targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy group (Group B). Relevant clinical data were collected, and the clinical efficacy, preservation of laryngeal function, complete response (CR) rate, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, major pathological response (MPR), and treatmentrelated adverse events (TRAEs) of the two groups were analyzed and compared.In both groups A and B, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were similar with no significant differences, but the pCR rate in Group A was much higher than that in Group B, at 37.5% and 7.4%, respectively (p<0.001). The rate of primary tumor downstaging in group A was much higher than that in group B (76.8% vs. 38.9%) as well (p<0.0001). In addition, the 1y-OS rate in group A was 95.7%, compared to 87.0% in group B (p=0.106, HR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.114-1.013), and the 1y-PFS rate was 89.4% in group A compared to 85.2% in group B (p=0.399, HR=0.675; 95% CI: 0.275-1.659). Furthermore, the larynx function preservation rate was significantly higher in group A at 85.7%, compared to that of group B at only 66.7% (p=0.019). There were no deaths due to TRAEs in either group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs between the two groups either (p=0.77). The main TRAEs in Group A were metabolism and nutrition disorders (52/56, 92.9%) and, in Group B were blood and lymphatic system disorders (40/54, 74.1%).PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy showed better short-term efficacy compared to targeted therapy. Additionally, a trend toward improved long-term survival was observed with PD-1 inhibitors but not with targeted therapy. Results for both groups indicate that neoadjuvant therapy is both safe and manageable.

    Keywords: PD-1 inhibitors, Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, Immunotherapy, comparison of efficacy, drug response

    Received: 17 Jul 2024; Accepted: 14 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Gao, Feng, Zhao, Huang, Chen, Yin, Guo, Zhong, Chen, Fang, Zhang and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yang Zhang, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, Beijing Municipality, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.