Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1463017
This article is part of the Research Topic Checkpoint Immunotherapy: Reshaping the Landscape of Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment View all 3 articles

Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
  • 2 First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Immunotherapy offers new hope for improved survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Although large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to explore the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer, the results are not completely consistent. And the strict inclusion criteria of RCTs lead to limited extrapolation. Therefore, it is of great significance to continue to conduct real-world studies comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric cancer.Methods: This retrospective study included patients with HER-2 negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) who received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone between January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups.Results: A total of 210 patients were enrolled in the combination treatment group (n=100) and chemotherapy alone group (n=110). After 12 months of follow-up, median PFS (mPFS) was 270 days (95%CI 177.510-362.490) in the chemotherapy alone group and 357 days in the combination treatment group (P<0.05).The median OS (mOS) was 14.9 months (95%CI 9.831-17.769) in the chemotherapy alone group and 15 months in the combination treatment group (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in ORR between two groups (P=0.050). The DCR was 14.5% in the chemotherapy alone group and 38% in the combination treatment group (P<0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that primary tumor location of GEJC, ECOG PS of 1, without liver metastasis, and chemotherapy plus ICIs were associated with PFS benefit. Cox multivariate analysis showed that only surgery or not was correlated with patients' prognosis (P<0.05). Most of AEs were grade 1-2 and manageable.Compared with chemotherapy alone, first-line ICIs combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC could greatly prolong PFS, but OS was not significantly improved, and the AEs were manageable.

    Keywords: gastric cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, Progression-free survival, overall survival

    Received: 11 Jul 2024; Accepted: 21 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Xu, Yi, Jia, Kong and Jia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Dan Yi, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
    Fanming Kong, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China
    Yingjie Jia, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nankai District, 300193, Tianjin, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.