The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Viral Immunology
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430899
This article is part of the Research Topic Treatment for COVID-19 across the possible use of monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents: clinical, epidemiological, virological, and immunological aspects View all 8 articles
Development of a COVID-19 Early Risk Assessment System Based on Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Routine Blood Tests: A Real-World Study
Provisionally accepted- 1 Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
- 3 Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Backgrounds: During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, the massive spread of the disease has placed an enormous burden on the world's healthcare and economy. The early risk assessment system based on a variety of machine learning (ML) algorithms may be able to provide more accurate advice on the classification of COVID-19 patients, offering predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM) solutions in the future.In this retrospective study, we divided a portion of the data into training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio and established a model based on a combination of two ML algorithms first. Then, we used another portion of the data as an independent testing cohort to determine the most accurate and stable model and compared it with other scoring systems. Finally, patients were categorized according to risk scores and then the correlation between their clinical data and risk scores was studied. The elderly accounted for the majority of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The Cindex of the model constructed by combining the stepcox[both] and survivalSVM algorithms was 0.840 in the training cohort and 0.815 in the validation cohort, which was calculated to have the highest C-index in the testing cohort compared to the other 119 ML model combinations. Compared with current scoring systems, including the CURB-65 and several reported prognosis models previously, our model had the highest AUC value of 0.778, representing an even higher predictive performance. In addition, the model's AUC values for specific time intervals, including days 7,14 and 28, demonstrate excellent predictive performance. Most importantly, we stratified patients according to the model's risk score and demonstrated a difference in survival status between the high-risk, median-risk, and low-risk groups, which means a new and stable risk assessment system was built. Finally, we found that COVID-19 patients with a history of cerebral infarction had a significantly higher risk of death.This novel risk assessment system is highly accurate in predicting the prognosis of patients with COVID-19, especially elderly patients with COVID-19, and can be well applied within the PPPM framework. Our ML model facilitates stratified patient management, meanwhile promoting the optimal use of healthcare resources.
Keywords: COVID-19, machine learning, predictive model, Categorized treatment, Predictive preventive personalized medicine
Received: 10 May 2024; Accepted: 09 Sep 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Qin, Li, Zhu, Yu, Peng, Wu, Gu, Guo and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Wen Gu, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Xuejun Guo, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.