Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. T Cell Biology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430648
This article is part of the Research Topic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities of T Cell Impairment in Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy View all articles

Chidamide Plus CHOP Improve the Survival of Newly Diagnosed Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma Running Head: Chidamide Plus CHOP Improve Survival

Provisionally accepted
Xiangping Zong Xiangping Zong Zhen Yang Zhen Yang Jin Zhou Jin Zhou Zhengming Jin Zhengming Jin Caixia Li Caixia Li Depei Wu Depei Wu *
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is known for its unfavorable survival prognosis. Chidamide has shown efficacy in relapsed/refractory AITL, but its efficacy in newly diagnosed AITL is uncertain. Objective: This retrospective research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chidamide when used with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and vincristine (CHOP) in comparison to CHOP by itself for individuals newly diagnosed with AITL, and to examine the impact of transplantation. Method: This was an analysis that compared outcomes among patients who received chidamide + CHOP on a clinical trial vs. historical controls who received CHOP alone, enrolling a total of sixty-six treatment-naive AITL patients between April 2014 and November 2022. Among them, thirty-three received chidamide in addition to CHOP (chidamide group), while thirty-three received CHOP alone (control group). The clinical characteristics were balanced between the two groups. All patients were scheduled to undergo up to six courses of treatment before transplantation. Results: The chidamide group had a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) compared to the control group, with a median OS that was not reached, as opposed to 20 months in the control group (p = 0.002). In the control group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months, while in the chidamide group, it was 22 months (p = 0.080). In the high-risk group (IPI ≥ 3), the chidamide group demonstrated notably superior complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR) compared to the control cohort (p = 0.002, p = 0.034). The PFS and OS in the chidamide group were not reached, and there were significant differences compared to the control group (p = 0.007, p = 0.003). The median OS of the transplanted group was longer than the non-transplanted group (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, chidamide group reduced the hazards of death in the total cohort. Conclusion: As the study was non-random and retrospective, Chidamide combined with chemotherapy should be tested in randomized trials given its potential to improve prognosis in treatment-naive AITL patients. Furthermore, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) has demonstrated enhanced overall survival in individuals with AITL.

    Keywords: Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), Chidamide, CHOP, Transplantation, survival. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03268889

    Received: 10 May 2024; Accepted: 25 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zong, Yang, Zhou, Jin, Li and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Depei Wu, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.