Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430571

TACE plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma beyond up-to-11 criteria: A multicenter cohort study

Provisionally accepted
Chen Song Chen Song 1Tang Shuangyan Tang Shuangyan 2Feng Shi Feng Shi 3Hongjie Cai Hongjie Cai 2Zhiqiang Wu Zhiqiang Wu 2Liguang Wang Liguang Wang 4Ping Ma Ping Ma 5Yuanmin Zhou Yuanmin Zhou 2Qicong Mai Qicong Mai 3Fan Wang Fan Wang 2Jiaming Lai Jiaming Lai 2Xiaoming Chen Xiaoming Chen 3Huan-Wei Chen Huan-Wei Chen 4Wenbo Guo Wenbo Guo 2*
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangdong, China
  • 2 The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3 Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 4 First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong Province, China
  • 5 Twelfth Guangzhou City People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Intermediate-stage (BCLC-B) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the up-to-11 criteria represent a significant therapeutic challenge due to high and heterogeneous tumor burden. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with lenvatinib and tislelizumab for these patients.In this retrospective cohort study, patients with unresectable intermediate-stage HCC beyond the up-to-11 criteria were enrolled and divided into TACE monotherapy (T), TACE combined with lenvatinib (TL), or TACE plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab (TLT) group based on the first-line treatment, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response according to RESIST1.1 and modified RECIST, and adverse events (AEs).Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and analyzed.Results: There were 38, 45, and 66 patients in the T, TL, and TLT groups, respectively. The TLT group exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR than the other two groups, as assessed by either mRECIST or RECIST 1.1 (all P<0.05). Median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the TLT group compared with the T group (PFS: 8.5 vs. 4.4 months; OS: 31.5 vs. 18.5 months; all P<0.001) and TL group (PFS: 8.5 vs. 5.5 months; OS: 31.5 vs. 20.5 months; all P<0.05). The incidence of TRAEs was slightly higher in the TLT and TL groups than in the T group, while all the toxicities were tolerable. No treatment-related death occurred in all groups.Conclusions: TACE combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab significantly improved the survival benefit compared with TACE monotherapy and TACE plus lenvatinib in patients with intermediate-stage HCC beyond the up-to-11 criteria, with an acceptable safety profile.

    Keywords: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Intermediate-stage, Up-to-eleven criteria, Transartrial chemoembolization, combination therapy

    Received: 10 May 2024; Accepted: 10 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Song, Shuangyan, Shi, Cai, Wu, Wang, Ma, Zhou, Mai, Wang, Lai, Chen, Chen and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Wenbo Guo, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.