Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1423796

Somatic mutational landscape reveals mutational signatures and significantly mutated genes of cancer immunotherapeutic outcome and sex disparities

Provisionally accepted
Yuting Li Yuting Li 1*Qinghua Wang Qinghua Wang 2Jinyang Zheng Jinyang Zheng 3Wenjing Zhang Wenjing Zhang 2Yanfeng Ren Yanfeng Ren 2Wei Shen Wei Shen 1Wei Su Wei Su 1*Ping Lu Ping Lu 1*
  • 1 The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
  • 2 Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 Sunshine Union Hospital, Weifang, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Currently developed molecular markers can predict the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy and screen beneficiaries to some extent, but they are not stable enough. Therefore, there is an urgent need for discovering novel biomarkers. At the same time, sex factor plays a vital role in the response to immunotherapy, so it is particularly important to identify sex-related molecular indicators. Methods: We integrated a pan-cancer cohort consisting of 2348 cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted sequencing. Using somatic mutation profiles, we identified mutational signatures, molecular subtypes, and frequently mutated genes, and analyzed their relationships with immunotherapeutic outcomes. We also explored sex disparities of determined biomarkers in response to treatments. Results: We found that male patients exhibited better immunotherapy outcomes and higher tumor mutational burden. A total of seven mutational signatures were identified, among which signatures 1 and 3 were associated with worse immunotherapy outcomes, while signatures 2 and 6 correlated with better outcomes. Gender-based analysis revealed that mutational signature 1 continued to show a worse immunotherapy outcome in female patients, whereas signature 6 demonstrated a better outcome in male patients. Based on mutational activities, we identified four potential molecular subtypes with gender differences and relevance to treatment outcomes. PI3K-AKT, RAS signaling pathways, and 68 significantly mutated genes were identified to be associated with immunotherapy outcomes, with nine genes (i.e., ATM, ATRX, DOT1L, EP300, EPHB1, NOTCH1, PBRM1, RBM10, and SETD2) exhibiting gender differences. Finally, we discovered co-mutated gene pairs and TP53 p.R282W mutations related to treatment outcomes, highlighting their gender-specific differences. Conclusion: This study identified several molecular biomarkers related to cancer immunotherapy outcomes in terms of mutational signatures, molecular subtypes, and mutated genes, and explored their gender-relatedness in order to provide clues and basis for clinical treatment efficacy evaluation and patient selection.

    Keywords: cancer immunotherapy, mutational signatures, Molecular subtypes, significantly mutated genes, Molecular indicators

    Received: 26 Apr 2024; Accepted: 11 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Li, Wang, Zheng, Zhang, Ren, Shen, Su and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yuting Li, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
    Wei Su, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
    Ping Lu, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.