Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 30 May 2024
Sec. Primary Immunodeficiencies

Infection risk in patients with autoimmune cytopenias and immune dysregulation treated with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus

Mattia Comella,&#x;Mattia Comella1,2†Elena Palmisani&#x;Elena Palmisani1†Marcello MarianiMarcello Mariani3Gianluca Dell&#x;OrsoGianluca Dell’Orso1Maria LicciardelloMaria Licciardello2Maria Carla GiarratanaMaria Carla Giarratana1Luca ArcuriLuca Arcuri1Sara PestarinoSara Pestarino1Alice GrossiAlice Grossi4Marina LanciottiMarina Lanciotti1Giorgia BrucciGiorgia Brucci5Daniela GuardoDaniela Guardo1Giovanna RussoGiovanna Russo2Carlo DufourCarlo Dufour1Francesca FioreddaFrancesca Fioredda1Elio CastagnolaElio Castagnola3Maurizio Miano*Maurizio Miano1*
  • 1Haematology Unit, Department of Haematology/Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
  • 2Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
  • 3Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
  • 4Genetic and Genomic of Rare Disease Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
  • 5Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

Introduction: Autoimmune cytopenias (AICs) are a group of disorders characterized by immune-mediated destruction of blood cells. In children, they are often secondary to immune dysregulation that may require long-lasting immunosuppression. Mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus represent two well-tolerated options to treat these disorders, often as a steroid-sparing option. However, no data are available on the infection risk for patients undergoing long-lasting treatments.

Patients and methods: The rate of severe infective events was calculated in episodes per 100 persons/months at risk (p/m/r) documented by the analysis of hospitalization charts between January 2015 and July 2023 of patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus given for isolated AIC or AICs associated with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS)/ALPS-like syndromes in two large Italian pediatric hematology units.

Results: From January 2015 to July 2023, 13 out of 96 patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus developed 16 severe infectious events requiring hospitalization. No patients died. Overall infection rate was 0.24 person/*100 months/risk (95% CI 0.09–0.3). Serious infectious events incidence was higher in patients with ALPS-like compared to others (0.42 versus 0.09; p = 0.006) and lower in patients who underwent mycophenolate treatment alone compared to those who started sirolimus after mycophenolate failure (0.04 versus 0.29, p = 0.03). Considering only patients who started treatment at the beginning of study period, overall cumulative hazard was 18.6% at 60 months (95% CI 3.4–31.4) with higher risk of infectious events after 5 years in ALPS-like patients (26.1%; 95% CI 3.2–43.5) compared to other AICs (4%; 95% CI 0–11.4; p = 0.041).

Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the infectious risk related to mycophenolate and sirolimus chronic treatment in patients with AICs and immune dysregulation. Our data highlight that infection rate is very low and mainly related to the underlying hematological condition.

Conclusions: Mycophenolate and sirolimus represent a safe immunosuppressive therapy in AICs and immune dysregulation syndromes.

Introduction

Autoimmune cytopenias (AICs) are a group of heterogeneous disorders characterized by immune-mediated destruction of one or more hematopoietic lineage cells, which include immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), autoimmune neutropenia (AIN), and Evans syndrome (ES) (19).

AICs may be isolated (idiopathic) or secondary to (i) autoimmune diseases, (ii) immunodeficiencies, (iii) tumors, (iv) medications, or (v) infections. In children, primary immunoregulatory disorders (PIRDs), a group of diseases characterized by the presence of autoimmunity and benign lymphoproliferation, represent frequent underlying conditions (8). Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS), a monogenic disorder secondary to defects of FAS-dependent apoptosis, is one of the first described examples of predisposing condition to AIC (10). Other novel PIRDs, often reported as ALPS-like disorders, secondary to the impairment of other molecular pathways, have been increasingly reported over the years (11). The clinical phenotype of these disorders is usually very heterogeneous. The intrinsic predisposition to infections is variable and usually related to the underlying molecular defect, being virtually absent in patients with ALPS (12) and more pronounced in most ALPS-like disorders, often characterized by hypogammaglobulinemia and defect of B-cell function.

In most cases, corticosteroids are given as first-choice treatment for AICs and/or PIRDs. However, some patients do not respond or become steroid-dependent and, therefore, at risk of undergoing severe side effects such as endocrine dysfunctions, osteoporosis, and avascular necrosis (3). Therefore, other long-term therapies are often required to control the disease and to reduce the risk of side effects. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SR) represent two manageable and well-tolerated (1) drugs that have been widely used either in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation or those with AICs and PIRDs. MMF, an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase in purine synthesis that targets B, T, and NK cells (13), has been shown to be effective in AIHA and immune thrombocytopenia in some retrospective studies on both adult and children (1416). SR, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has been used for many years (17) in the setting of autoimmune diseases, solid organ transplants, and AIHA (1820). SR has also been reported as an effective treatment for ALPS patients with or without cytopenia (21) by reducing the count of double-negative T cells (22), by increasing T-regulatory cells (T-regs), and by inducing apoptosis of abnormal lymphocytes. However, no data are available on the risk of infections in the setting of hematological patients under such treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the infectious risk of MMF and SR treatments in patients with ALPS, ALPS-like, and AIC referred at two main Italian pediatric hematology centers.

Patients and methods

Patients diagnosed with ALPS/ALPS-like syndromes with or without AIC and patients with isolated AICs treated with MMF or SR at the Hematology Unit of IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy, and Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Unit of “Policlinico of Catania”, Catania, Italy, from January 2015 to July 2023 were included. Patients fulfilling the revised diagnostic criteria for definitive/probable ALPS were classified as ALPS patients (10). ALPS-like was defined as the presence of AIC associated with one absolute or primary additional criterion for ALPS. A severe infectious event (SIE) was defined as hospitalization and/or the requirement for intravenous antibiotics, independently from microbiological findings. Infection crude rate was calculated in episodes per 100 persons/months at risk (p/m/r) with Poisson 95% confidence interval. Descriptive statistics were produced for demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Groups were compared with Pearson’s chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact when appropriate) and parametric or nonparametric tests according to data distribution. An SIE-free survival analysis was performed by Kaplan–Meier estimate considering newly diagnosed patients who started immunomodulatory treatment before January 2015. SIE occurring during the first 4 weeks of treatment was excluded, since both drugs are usually active not earlier than 4–6 weeks. Differences between ALPS-like and other AIC groups’ SIE-free survival were assessed by log rank test.

Results

Between January 2015 and July 2023, a total of 103 patients (51 female patients, 53%) with a median age of 9 years (IQR 10) were identified. Among those, 49/103 (47.6%) were diagnosed after 2015. Seven patients were lost at follow-up after diagnosis. The remaining 96 were treated with MMF (35, 36%) and SR (31, 32%) alone or with SR after MMF failure (30, 31%). Thirty (31%) out of 96 patients were affected with isolated AIC, being ITP in all cases. The remaining 19 (20%) and 47 (49%) suffered from ALPS and ALPS-like syndromes, respectively. MMF and SR were given for a median of 31 months (IQR 71 and 43, respectively). Overall observation time was 6,620 months. Patients who underwent MMF or SR treatments alone were followed for a total of 2,494 and 2,091 months, respectively, while patients with MMF-SR sequential treatment had 2,035 months of total follow-up.

Forty-five (47%) out of 96 patients developed infections during therapy, mostly mild upper respiratory infections. A total of 16 SIEs were documented in 13/96 patients (13%) and were mostly pneumonias (10). The remaining events consisted of abdominal infections (2), sepsis (2), cryptococcal meningitis (1), and pyelonephritis (1). Clinical features of patients with and without SIEs according to diagnosis and treatment are summarized in Table 1. Among patients with at least one SIE, a higher frequency of ALPS-like diagnosis (10/13, 76%) (p = 0.038) and history of therapy with both MMF and SR (7/13, 53.8%) (p = 0.05) were observed (Table 1). Eleven (84.6%) out of 13 patients were under SR treatment at time of SIE. Six (60%) out of 10 ALPS-like patients with SIE were found to have an underlying genetic disorder, which was detected only in 9 out of the remaining 45 (20%) without SIE (p = 0.01). Table 2 shows the clinical features of patients with SIE. Overall, an SIE crude rate of 0.24 *100 p/m/r (95% CI 0.09–0.3) was observed. Diagnosis of ALPS-like was associated with a higher incidence of SIE compared with other diagnosis (0.32 vs. 0.09; p = 0.03). MMF treatment was associated with a lower incidence of SIEs compared with patients who underwent only SR or sequential MMF/SR (0.04 *100 p/m/r versus 0.43 and 0.29, respectively; Figures 1A, B). Data are summarized in Table 3.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Clinical features of patients with and without SIEs according to diagnosis and treatment.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Clinical features of patients with severe infectious events.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 (A) SIE incidence rate differences between ALPS-like and other AICs. (B) SIE incidence rate differences between treatment schedules.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 SIE incidence rate divided by diagnosis.

Analyzing data only from 49 patients diagnosed after 2015, an overall observation time of 2,866 months was recorded. ALPS-like and other AIC patients were followed for a total of 1,181 and 1,685 months, respectively. MMF and SR alone treatments were given for 573 and 558 months, respectively. Sequential MMF/SR therapies covered a period of 490 months. Six SIEs occurred in 6/49 patients (12%), with a crude rate of 0.21 *100 p/m/r (95% CI 0.08–0.5). Also in this case, a statistically significant difference was found between ALPS-like and other AICs (0.42 versus 0.06 *100 p/m/r; p = 0.03). All episodes occurred during SR treatment. Among them, 3/6 (50%) received SR treatment after MMF failure. Data are summarized in Table 3. Overall SIE cumulative hazard of this cohort was 18.6% at 60 months (95% CI 3.4–31.4). In this group of patients, a higher cumulative risk of SIE after 5 years was found between ALPS-like patients (26.1%; 95% CI 3.2–43.5) and other AICs (4%; 95% CI 0–11.4; p = 0.041) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Overall and diagnosis-based SIEs cumulative risk.

Discussion

Over the last decade, efficacy and safety of SR and mycophenolate therapy in patients with ALPS, ALPS-like, and other AICs have been described in several reports (1, 2, 57, 9, 12, 1517, 2133). However, there are no studies reporting the actual risks of infections in patients undergoing these treatments over the years. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of patients in which infection rate and SIEs have been quantitatively evaluated and shows that only 13% of patients had severe events requiring hospitalization and/or intravenous antibacterial therapy.

In our records, only one patient treated with MMF between 2015 and 2023 developed SIEs, which is in line with previous data (29, 3234). In the pediatric setting, some reports on children treated with MMF for non-hematological diseases showed similar results (34, 35), but no data were available on hematological patients apart from two case reports (31, 36).

In our cohort, SIEs occurred in all cases but one under SR treatment. Very few reports have shown the relationship between SR therapy and infections in hematological patients and no increase was observed in infection frequency or severity (21, 30). In the few articles on infection rate in patients with PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) treated with SR, a possible increased risk of infections was highlighted, which was similar to what was reported in our cohort (41% vs. 47%) (37, 38). However, that report was not focused on SIEs, which are more clinically relevant. Indeed, in our study, we analyzed SIEs over a long follow-up and demonstrate that they occur quite rarely (13%). Moreover, unlike PROS, the analysis of our patients with SIEs excluded the first 4 weeks of treatments when any possible event would be hardly related to the immunosuppressive effect that takes 6–8 weeks to become fully established (37, 38). In our cohort, most patients developing SIEs under SR were affected with ALPS-like syndromes. Compared to isolated AIC, which in our cohort was represented only by primary ITP, and ALPS subjects, it is known that patients affected with these disorders are known to have an increased risk of developing infections, mostly related to lymphopenia and hypogammaglobulinemia, which were present in all of our cases. In addition, our ALPS-like patients developing SIEs were in most cases affected with underlying genetic disorders as the STAT3 GOF syndrome, TACI, or NEMO deficiency that are, per se, typically associated with a high infection risk (3941). Similarly, all our patients with a diagnosis of Cartilage-Hair-Hypoplasia (CHH), IPEX, and LRBA deficiency developed a complex phenotype with autoimmunity and immunodeficiency (42, 43). Of note, the ALPS-like subgroup, in addition to carrying the highest SIE rate, was also the one in which genetic disorders were more frequently detected. This highlights the importance of specific genetic diagnosis to also evaluate the infection risk. Interestingly, the higher occurrence of SIEs during SR rather than during MMF seems in contrast with the knowledge that SR has a prevalent immunoregulatory than immunosuppressive effect. A possible explanation could reside in the higher number and in the longer duration of previous therapies received by this subgroup of patients.

In conclusion, still with the limitations of a retrospective data review, our findings suggest that MMF and SR treatment is associated with a very limited risk of SIEs in patients with AICs and PIRDs and that this risk is mainly related to the immunodeficient status related to the underlying ALPS-like disorder. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Comitato Etico Regione Liguria. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

MC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Supervision, Validation. MMa: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GD’O: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MLi: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Methodology. MG: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. LA: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SP: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AG: Investigation, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. MLa: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. GB: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. DG: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. GR: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. CD: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. FF: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. EC: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. MMi: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Miano M, Scalzone M, Perri K, Palmisani E, Caviglia I, Micalizzi C, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil and Sirolimus as second or further line treatment in children with chronic refractory Primitive or Secondary Autoimmune Cytopenias: A single centre experience. Br J Haematol. (2015) 171:247–53. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Kochhar M, Neunert C. Immune thrombocytopenia: A review of upfront treatment strategies. Blood Rev. (2021) 49. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100822

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Provan D, Arnold DM, Bussel JB, Chong BH, Cooper N, Gernsheimer T, et al. Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. (2019) 3:3780–817. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T, Michel M, Provan D, Arnold DM, et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: Report from an international working group. Blood. (2009) 113:2386–93. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-162503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Neunert C, Terrell DR, Arnold DM, Buchanan G, Cines DB, Cooper N, et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. (2019) 3:3829–66. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000966

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Russo G, Parodi E, Farruggia P, Notarangelo LD, Perrotta S, Casale M, et al. Recommendations for the management of acute immune thrombocytopenia in children. A Consensus Conference from the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Recommendations HEMOSTASIS AND THROMBOSIS. Pediatr Hematology-Oncology. (2023).

Google Scholar

7. Miano M, Ramenghi U, Russo G, Rubert L, Barone A, Tucci F, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of children with immune thrombocytopenia and Evans syndrome. A retrospective data review from the Italian association of paediatric haematology/oncology. Br J Haematol. (2016) 175:490–5. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. López-Nevado M, González-Granado LI, Ruiz-García R, Pleguezuelo D, Cabrera-Marante O, Salmón N, et al. Primary immune regulatory disorders with an autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-like phenotype: immunologic evaluation, early diagnosis and management. Front Immunol. (2021) 12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.671755

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lambert MP. Presentation and diagnosis of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS). Expert Rev Clin Immunol. (2021) 17:1163–73. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1978842

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Oliveira JB, Bleesing JJ, Dianzani U, Fleisher TA, Jaffe ES, Lenardo MJ, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria and classification for the autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS): Report from the 2009 NIH International Workshop. Blood. (2010) 116(14): e35–e40. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-280347

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Abolhassani H, Azizi G, Sharifi L, Yazdani R, Mohsenzadegan M, Delavari S, et al. Global systematic review of primary immunodeficiency registries. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. (2020) 16(7): 717–32. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2020.1801422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Rao VK, Oliveira JB. How I treat autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Blood. (2011) 118(22): 5741–51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-325217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Allison AC, Eugui EM. Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action. Immunopharmacology. (2000) 47:85–118. doi: 10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00188-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Howard J, Hoffbrand AV, Prentice HG, Mehta A. Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of refractory auto-immune haemolytic anaemia and auto-immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Br J Haematol. (2002) 117:712–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03430.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Provan D, Moss AJ, Newland AC, Bussel JB. Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil as sinqle-aqent therapy for refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Hematol. (2006) 81:19–25. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20515

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Zhang WG, Ji L, Cao XM, Chen YX, He AL, Liu J, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil as a treatment for refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2005) 26:598–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2005.00088.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hartford CM, Ratain MJ. Rapamycin: Something old, something new, sometimes borrowed and now renewed. Clin Pharmacol Ther. (2007) 82:381–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Williams O, Bhat R, Badawy SM. Sirolimus for treatment of refractory primary warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia in children. Blood Cells Molecules Dis. (2020) 83. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2020.102427

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Augustine JJ, Bodziak KA, Hricik DE. Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation. Drugs. (2007) 67:369–391. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767030-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wyman B, Perl A. Metabolic pathways mediate pathogenesis and offer targets for treatment in rheumatic diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol. (2020) 32:184–91. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000687

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Bride KL, Vincent T, Smith-Whitley K, Lambert MP, Bleesing JJ, Seif AE, et al. Sirolimus is effective in relapsed/refractory autoimmune cytopenias: results of a prospective multi-institutional trial Key Points. Blood. (2016) 127(1):17–28. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-657981

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Teachey DT, Seif AE, Grupp SA. Advances in the management and understanding of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS). Br J Haematology. (2010) 148:205–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07991.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rao VK, Dugan F, Dale JK, Davis J, Tretler J, Hurley JK, et al. Use of mycophenolate mofetil for chronic, refractory immune cytopenias in children with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Br J Haematol. (2005) 129:534–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05496.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Saverio Ladogana C, Saverio Ladogana R, Maruzzi M, Russo G, Barcellini W, Zanella A, et al. Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica Gruppo di Lavoro Patologia del Globulo Rosso Coordinatori: Silverio Perrotta-Giovanna Russo Raccomandazioni per la gestione del bambino con Anemia Emolitica Autoimmune.

Google Scholar

25. Miano M. How I manage Evans Syndrome and AIHA cases in children. Vol 172 Br J Haematology Blackwell Publishing Ltd;. (2016) p:524–34. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13866

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Miano M, Poggi V, Banov L, Fioredda F, Micalizzi C, Svahn J, et al. Sirolimus as maintenance treatment in an infant with life-threatening multiresistant pure red cell anemia/autoimmune hemolytic anemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2014) 36(3):e145–8. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31828d9928

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ramenghi U, Casale M, Cesaro S, Del Vecchio GC, Farruggia P, Giordano P, et al. Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica Gruppo di Lavoro “Disturbi della Coagulazione” RACCOMANDAZIONI PER LA GESTIONE DELLA TROMBOCITOPENIA IMMUNE (ITP) PERSISTENTE-CRONICA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA Revisori interni.

Google Scholar

28. Rensing-Ehl A, AllgäuerAllg A, Schreiner E, Ricarda Lorenz M, Rohr J, Klemann C, et al. Hyperactive mTOR pathway promotes lymphoproliferation and abnormal differentiation in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Blood. (2016) 128(2):227–38. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-685024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Taylor A, Neave L, Solanki S, Westwood JP, Terrinonive I, Mcguckin S, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for severe immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. (2015) 171:625–30. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13622

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Nocerino A, Valencic E, Loganes C, Pelos G, Tommasini A. Low-dose sirolimus in two cousins with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-associated infection. Pediatr Int. (2018) 60:315–7. doi: 10.1111/ped.13494

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Weli M, Ben Hlima A, Belhadj R, Maalej B, Elleuch A, Mekki N, et al. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in children. Transfusion Clinique Biologique. (2020) 27:61–4. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2020.03.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Bradbury CA, Pell J, Hill Q, Bagot C, Cooper N, Ingram J, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for first-line treatment of immune thrombocytopenia. New Engl J Med. (2021) 385:885–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100596

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Goldberg TA, Levy CF. Mycophenolate mofetil use in pediatric immune thrombocytopenia refractory to first-line therapy: a single-center experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2023) 45:339–43. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002688

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Hassan AV, Sinha MD, Waller S. A single-centre retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in children and adolescents with nephrotic syndrome. Clin Kidney J. (2013) 6:384–9. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sft071

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Barbati F, Marrani E, Volpi B, Ferrara G, Lodi L, Mastrolia MV, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil-induced hypogammaglobulinemia and infectious disease susceptibility in pediatric patients with chronic rheumatic disorders: a monocentric retrospective study. Eur J Pediatr. (2022) 181:3439–48. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04560-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Lim LM, Chang JM, Wang IF, Chang WC, Hwang DY, Chen HC. Atypical X-linked agammaglobulinaemia caused by a novel BTK mutation in a selective immunoglobulin M deficiency patient. BMC Pediatr. (2013) 13:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-150

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Russell TB, Rinker EK, Dillingham CS, Givner LB, McLean TW. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia during sirolimus therapy for kaposiform emangioendothelioma. Pediatrics. (2018) 141:e20171044. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Parker VE R, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Faivre L, Luu M, Oden NL, De Silva L, et al. Safety and efficacy of low-dose sirolimus in the PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum. Genet In Med. (2019) 21:1189–98. doi: 10.1038/s41436-

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Salzer U, Grimbacher B. TACI deficiency — a complex system out of balance. Curr Opin Immunol. (2021) 71:81–8. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2021.06.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lee Y, Wessel AW, Xu J, Reinke JG, Lee E, Kim SM, et al. Genetically programmed alternative splicing of NEMO mediates an autoinflammatory disease phenotype. J Clin Invest. (2022) 132. doi: 10.1172/JCI128808

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Leiding JW, Vogel TP, Santarlas VGJ, Mhaskar R, Smith MR, Carisey A, et al. Monogenic early-onset lymphoproliferation and autoimmunity: Natural history of STAT3 gain-of-function syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2023) 151:1081–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.09.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Kiykim A, Ogulur I, Dursun E, Charbonnier LM, Nain E, Cekic S, et al. Abatacept as a long-term targeted therapy for LRBA deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunology: In Practice. (2019) 7:2790–2800.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.06.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Barzaghi F, Amaya Hernandez LC, Neven B, Ricci S, Kucuk ZY, Bleesing JJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of IPEX syndrome patients after different therapeutic strategies: An international multicenter retrospective study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 141:1036–1049.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mycophenolate, sirolimus, infection, PIRDs, ALPS, ALPS-like, ITP, autoimmune cytopenia

Citation: Comella M, Palmisani E, Mariani M, Dell’Orso G, Licciardello M, Giarratana MC, Arcuri L, Pestarino S, Grossi A, Lanciotti M, Brucci G, Guardo D, Russo G, Dufour C, Fioredda F, Castagnola E and Miano M (2024) Infection risk in patients with autoimmune cytopenias and immune dysregulation treated with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus. Front. Immunol. 15:1415389. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1415389

Received: 10 April 2024; Accepted: 14 May 2024;
Published: 30 May 2024.

Edited by:

Andrew R. Gennery, Newcastle University, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Angela Deya Martinez, Private Practitioner, Barcelona, Spain
Elizabeth Secord, Wayne State University, United States

Copyright © 2024 Comella, Palmisani, Mariani, Dell’Orso, Licciardello, Giarratana, Arcuri, Pestarino, Grossi, Lanciotti, Brucci, Guardo, Russo, Dufour, Fioredda, Castagnola and Miano. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Maurizio Miano, mauriziomiano@gaslini.org

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.