Long-term safety and impact of immune recovery in heavily treatment-experienced adults receiving fostemsavir for up to 5 years in the phase 3 BRIGHTE study

Introduction: Fostemsavir is a gp120-directed attachment inhibitor approved for heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. We provide detailed week 240 safety results from the BRIGHTE study and evaluate the impact of immune recovery on safety outcomes.

Methods: The phase 3 BRIGHTE trial is ongoing; data for this analysis were collected from the first participant’s first visit (February 23, 2015) through the last participant’s last visit for week 240 (March 22, 2021). Safety endpoints were assessed in participants who received fostemsavir + optimized background therapy. In participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³, exposure-adjusted adverse event (AE) rates were assessed among subgroups with or without CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ at any time during 48-week analysis periods through week 192.

Results: Through a median of 258 weeks (range, 0.14–319) of treatment, discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 30/371 (8%) participants. Serious AEs were reported in 177/371 (48%) participants, including 16 drug-related events in 13 (4%) participants. Thirty-five (9%) deaths occurred, primarily related to AIDS or acute infections. COVID-19–related events occurred in 25 (7%) participants; all resolved without sequelae. Among participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³, 122/162 (75%) achieved CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ at week 192. Exposure-adjusted AE rates were markedly lower among participants achieving CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ at any time vs those sustaining <200 cells/mm³. No new AIDS-defining events were reported after week 48 in participants with CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³.

Conclusions: Cumulative safety findings through the BRIGHTE 240-week interim analysis are consistent with other trials in HTE participants with advanced HIV-1 and comorbid disease. Reduced rates of AIDS-defining events and AEs were observed in participants with immunologic recovery on fostemsavir-based treatment.

Clinical trial number: NCT02362503, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02362503.

1 Introduction

Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) individuals living with HIV-1 have limited treatment options due to resistance and intolerance to multiple prior antiretrovirals (1, 2). For these individuals, the approvals of 3 first-in-class antiretrovirals (the gp120-directed attachment inhibitor fostemsavir (3), the CD4-directed post-attachment inhibitor ibalizumab (4), and the capsid inhibitor lenacapavir (5)) have introduced new treatment options; however, creating viable antiretroviral regimens can be complicated by comorbidities, psychosocial factors, drug-drug interactions, and non-adherence (2, 6–9). An antiretroviral regimen with a favorable safety and tolerability profile is essential for HTE individuals who may have experienced intolerance and/or toxicity issues and who may require concomitant therapies for comorbidities (2, 7, 9).

Compromised immunologic function is not unusual in HTE persons and contributes to an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes (2, 9). Low CD4+ T-cell count (<200 cells/mm³) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, from both non-specific and specific causes, including COVID-19, tuberculosis, and AIDS-related illnesses (10–14). Low CD4+/CD8+ ratio (<0.3) correlates with higher risk of non–AIDS-defining events and mortality (15–17). Restoration of immunologic function, measured by increases in absolute CD4+ T-cell count to >200 cells/mm³ and CD4+/CD8+ ratio to >0.45, is an important treatment goal for all people living with HIV, particularly those with low CD4+ T-cell count (16–20).

In the phase 3 BRIGHTE trial, HTE adults treated with fostemsavir + optimized background therapy (OBT) experienced durable virologic responses and clinically meaningful improvements in CD4+ T-cell count and CD4+/CD8+ ratio through week 240 (21). BRIGHTE included participants with advanced HIV-1 disease: 75% had baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³ (30% had baseline CD4+ T-cell count <20 cells/mm³; mean, 138 cells/mm³; median, 80 cells/mm³), and mean baseline CD4+/CD8+ ratio was 0.18 (8).

CD4+ T-cell responses in BRIGHTE were greater than expected based on prior studies in similar populations (22–24). Mean increase in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline to week 240 was 296 cells/mm³ in the randomized cohort (RC) and 240 cells/mm³ in the non-randomized cohort (NRC), and mean CD4+/CD8+ ratio increased from 0.20 at baseline to 0.60 at week 240 in the RC and from 0.12 to 0.32 in the NRC (21). Among RC participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <50 cells/mm³, 74% (34/46) had ≥200 cells/mm³ at week 240, representing a potential decreased risk of most AIDS-defining illnesses and a transition from opportunistic infection prophylaxis to no prophylaxis (21, 25).

Here we provide a detailed description of week 240 safety results from BRIGHTE. To better understand the potential impact of immune recovery on safety outcomes in BRIGHTE, we determined exposure-adjusted AE frequency over time by baseline CD4+ T-cell count and among those achieving CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ any time on study vs those sustaining <200 cells/mm³ during 48-week analysis periods through week 192.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study design and participants

BRIGHTE (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362503) is a phase 3 trial that included HTE adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV-1 with virologic failure (screening HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL) and ≤2 fully active and available antiretrovirals remaining (8, 21, 26). Participants with 1 to 2 fully active antiretrovirals were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive oral fostemsavir 600 mg twice daily or placebo + current failing regimen (RC) for 8 days followed by open-label fostemsavir + OBT for all participants. Participants with no fully active and available antiretrovirals received open-label fostemsavir + OBT starting on day 1 (NRC). In the NRC, the OBT could include investigational antiretrovirals (eg, ibalizumab). BRIGHTE remains ongoing wherever participants are unable to access fostemsavir by other means. For this analysis, the first participant’s first visit occurred on February 23, 2015, and the last participant’s week 240 visit occurred on March 22, 2021; the week 240 data cutoff was June 24, 2021.

BRIGHTE was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Study protocols, amendments, and other required documents were reviewed and approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (Puyallup, WA). All participants provided written informed consent before study initiation.

2.2 Safety assessments

Cumulative safety data were collected through the week 240 data cutoff for the safety population (all participants who received ≥1 dose of fostemsavir). Safety assessments included monitoring of AEs, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and physical examinations. Electrocardiograms were used to monitor QTc intervals, including thresholds for stopping study drug (see Supplementary Methods 1). Assessments were performed on day 1 and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, and every 48 weeks thereafter and/or early termination (including week 240).

Adverse events were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; version 19.1). Severity of AEs and laboratory abnormalities was graded using the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (version 2.0, November 2014) (27). Relationship to study drug was determined by the treating investigator.

Adverse events of special interest (AESIs), selected on the basis of emerging non-clinical/clinical safety data for fostemsavir, disease and/or population events, and/or regulatory requirements, included QTc prolongation/ventricular tachyarrhythmias and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS).

At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (December 2019), all ongoing BRIGHTE participants had received ≥192 weeks of fostemsavir + OBT. Investigators used World Health Organization guidelines for COVID-19 diagnosis and reported exposure risk, testing results, and symptom presence (28).

2.3 Analyses of adverse events by baseline and on-treatment CD4+ T-cell count

In participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³ and an available CD4+ T-cell count at week 192, a pilot analysis of crude incidence rates of AEs was conducted among subgroups based on week 192 CD4+ T-cell count (<200 vs ≥200 cells/mm³). This pilot analysis was limited by a small sample size and a single time point. To include participants who discontinued before week 192 and additional time points for CD4+ T-cell count measurements, another analysis was conducted. This second analysis evaluated exposure-adjusted AE incidence rates calculated using participant-years of fostemsavir exposure for subgroups based on CD4+ T-cell count during four 48-week analysis periods (0 to <48, ≥48 to <96, ≥96 to <144, and ≥144 to <192 weeks) in participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³. Week 192 was used as the data cutoff for these analyses because subsequent results were impacted by study completion and the COVID-19 pandemic (Table 1). For each 48-week analysis period, participants were assigned to 1 of 2 subgroups: (1) CD4+ T-cell count remained <200 cells/mm³ for all measures throughout the analysis period or (2) CD4+ T-cell count was ≥200 cells/mm³ at least once during the analysis period.

Table 1

Table 1 Participant Disposition Through the Week 240 Data Cutoff (June 24, 2021; Safety Population).

Assessed AE categories were all-cause AEs, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class C AIDS-defining events, and infections and infestations. Infections and infestations included preferred terms of special interest (PTSIs) from the MedDRA infections and infestations system organ class (SOC), which were selected to exclude terms associated with non-specific infections and infections that were non-serious and/or typically not related to immunosuppression (see Supplementary Methods 2). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for each analysis period were based on number of reported AEs with a start date in the period and number of participant-years of fostemsavir exposure within the period.

3 Results

3.1 Participants

Of 371 participants enrolled and treated in BRIGHTE, 232 (63%) were ongoing at their week 240 study visit window (RC, n=188; NRC, n=44). Of these, 59/232 (25%) had their week 240 visit impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including 13 (6%) who missed the visit altogether and 46 (20%) who had some assessments missed. At the week 240 data cutoff (June 24, 2021), 156/371 (42%) participants were ongoing, 133/272 (49%) in the RC and 23/99 (23%) in the NRC (Table 1).

Baseline characteristics for BRIGHTE participants were consistent with advanced HIV-1 disease, particularly in the NRC (Supplementary Table 1). In the RC and NRC, baseline CD4+ T-cell count was <200 cells/mm³ for 199/272 (73%) and 79/99 (80%) participants, respectively, and <20 cells/mm³ for 72/272 (26%) and 40/99 (40%) participants, respectively. Furthermore, the majority of participants had >10 years of previous antiretroviral treatment, with 92/272 (34%) and 58/99 (59%) participants in the RC and NRC, respectively, having >20 years of treatment.

3.2 Analysis of adverse events through week 192 by baseline and on-treatment CD4+ T-cell count

3.2.1 Pilot assessment

At week 192, 162/278 (58%) participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³ had an on-treatment CD4+ T-cell count at week 192 and 122/162 (75%) had CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³. Overall, the frequency of serious AEs (SAEs), any grade 3/4 AEs, and AIDS-defining events was lower among participants with CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ at week 192 vs those with <200 cells/mm³ (Table 2). This was particularly apparent in the RC, while in the NRC, no differences were seen for SAEs or grade 3/4 AEs. No difference between subgroups was seen in either cohort for AEs from the infections and infestations SOC, possibly due to the impact of common non-serious infections (eg, upper respiratory tract infections). A subsequent analysis used only PTSIs, as described in the Methods.

Table 2

Table 2 Summary of AEs Through Week 192 by CD4+ T-Cell Count at Week 192 for Participants With Baseline CD4+ T-Cell Count <200 Cells/mm^3†.

3.2.2 Exposure-adjusted adverse event assessment

Overall, exposure-adjusted rate of all-cause AEs was markedly lower among participants with CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ at any time compared with those with sustained CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³ during the same analysis period (Figure 1). Similar patterns were seen for infection and infestation PTSIs and AIDS-defining events. In participants with any on-treatment CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ at least once within each 48-week analysis period, no new AIDS-defining events were reported after week 48. For all types of AEs, the highest exposure-adjusted rates occurred in the first 48 weeks of the study, with lower frequencies observed in subsequent analysis periods. Results in the RC were similar to those for the overall analysis.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Exposure-adjusted rates of (A, D, G) all-cause AEs, (B, E, H) infection and infestation PTSIs, and (C, F, I) AIDS-defining events through week 192^† by CD4+ T-cell count during the analysis period for participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³. In participants randomized to placebo, only data from start of open-label fostemsavir are included. For each panel, AE rates are based on the number of reported AEs for the specified category (y-axis) with a start date within the specified analysis period (legend). AE, adverse event; OBT, optimized background therapy; PTSI, preferred term of special interest. ^†Week 192 was used as the data cutoff for these analyses because subsequent results were impacted by study completion and the COVID-19 pandemic. ^‡Infectious disorders and ectoparasitic infestations. Infections and infestations included PTSIs from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities infections and infestations system organ class, which were selected to exclude terms associated with non-specific infections and infections that were non-serious and/or typically not related to immunosuppression. ^§Number of participants who received fostemsavir, had ≥1 CD4+ T-cell count during the specified analysis period, and had CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³ for all measures throughout the specified analysis period (<200 subgroup) or had at least 1 measure of ≥200 cells/mm³ at any time during the specified analysis period (≥200 subgroup). ^¶Total number of participant-years of treatment with fostemsavir for subgroup participants over the specified analysis period.

In the NRC, numbers of participants with on-treatment CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ were very low in all analysis periods compared with the RC. There were no clear differences in exposure-adjusted rates of all-cause AEs or infection and infestation PTSIs between subgroups; however, AIDS-defining events in the NRC occurred only in participants with sustained CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³ through week 192. Furthermore, frequency of all-cause AEs and infection and infestation PTSIs decreased after week 96.

3.3 Cumulative safety through week 240

At the week 240 cutoff, median duration of fostemsavir exposure for the safety population was 258 weeks (range, 1 day to 319 weeks). Total participant-years of exposure to fostemsavir was 1428.28 (RC, 1101.33; NRC, 326.95). Cumulative safety through week 240 in BRIGHTE has previously been reported (21) and is presented in Table 3. Across both cohorts, 357/371 (96%) participants reported ≥1 AE. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 30 (8%) participants.

Table 3

Table 3 Cumulative Safety Through Week 240.

Serious AEs and deaths were more frequent in the NRC than the RC. These were most commonly reported from the infections and infestations SOC. A total of 16 drug-related SAEs were reported in 13 participants, with 15 occurring before week 96. The only drug-related SAEs reported more than once were IRIS (3 cases) and nephrolithiasis (2 cases), and only 3 participants discontinued because of a drug-related SAE (Supplementary Table 2).

There were 35 deaths (9%; RC, n=15; NRC, n=20), including 6 (3 per cohort) that occurred after week 96 (Table 3; Supplementary Table 3). All but 1 of the participants who died were treated with fostemsavir. Deaths were primarily related to AIDS (n=12) or acute infections (n=12). One death was considered by the investigator to be related to study drug (IRIS related to recurrent atypical mycobacterial infection). Only 2/35 participants who died had a baseline CD4+ T-cell count >200 cells/mm³, while most (26/35 [74%]) had <50 cells/mm³ (median baseline CD4+ T-cell count, 11 cells/mm³). The last recorded CD4+ T-cell count before death was <200 cells/mm³ in 32/35 (91%) participants who died.

During the study, 25 participants had 28 COVID-19–related events. Four participants had suspected COVID-19, but no confirmatory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test result was reported, 3 had negative COVID-19 PCR test results reported, and 18 had PCR-confirmed COVID-19 (RC, n=15; NRC, n=3). All cases resolved without reported sequelae, and there were no reports of post–COVID-19 syndrome (although this was not specifically queried). Seven participants (all in the RC) were hospitalized, and COVID-19 was reported as an SAE (Supplementary Table 4). For these participants, the most recent CD4+ T-cell counts before COVID-19 diagnosis ranged from 164 to 1641 cells/mm³, and 5/7 had HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL. Median event duration was 19 days (range, 15–43). Treatment for COVID-19 often included prophylactic anticoagulants and supplemental oxygen; no changes were made to any antiretroviral regimen.

3.3.1 QTc prolongation

Eleven (3%) participants were discontinued from the study for meeting protocol-specified ECG QTc prolongation stopping criteria (7 before the week 96 cutoff; Supplementary Figure 1). Of these 11 discontinuations, 1 participant was receiving concomitant amiodarone for atrial fibrillation, 2 had QTc prolongation at baseline, and 7 had at least 1 confounding ECG abnormality present at baseline (eg, sinus bradycardia, left or right bundle branch block, left axis deviation, and left anterior fascicular block). In 4/11 cases, the investigator reported the ECG QT prolongation as an AE (all non-serious). None experienced a corresponding symptomatic cardiovascular event or had any evidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and most (9/11 [82%]) were able to continue fostemsavir treatment after study discontinuation. Two additional cases of ECG QT prolongation were reported as AEs but did not result in discontinuation (Table 3).

3.3.2 Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

IRIS was reported in 8 (2%) participants; all cases occurred within 16 weeks of treatment initiation (Supplementary Table 5). Five events occurred in participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <20 cells/mm³. Three events were classified as SAEs, including 1 associated with recurrent atypical mycobacterial infection that was fatal; no other events resulted in discontinuation of study treatment.

3.3.3 Laboratory abnormalities

The most common grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities reported through week 240 were increased serum creatinine, decreased estimated creatinine clearance, and increased direct bilirubin. Mean increase in serum creatinine and/or decrease in estimated creatinine clearance was apparent from week 4, after which there were continued small changes through week 240. Participants with emergent grade 3/4 changes in serum creatinine (n=117) and/or estimated creatinine clearance (n=166) typically had other risk factors for renal decline including comorbidities, low baseline CD4+ T-cell count, and low baseline body weight. Concomitant medications associated with increased serum creatinine included sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (used by 188/371, 51%) and azithromycin (used by 166/371, 45%). Further, 305/371 (82%) participants included dolutegravir in their initial OBT, many twice daily (242/371, 65%); increased serum creatinine is a known effect of dolutegravir, which inhibits renal transport of creatinine via organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) (29). All participants with emergent grade 3/4 changes in creatinine and/or creatinine clearance were able to continue fostemsavir.

There were no emergent grade 4 increases in direct bilirubin. Grade 3 direct bilirubin elevation was reported in 42 participants. Ten of these participants experienced a hepatobiliary AE/SAE during the study: 3 with hepatitis B virus reactivation; 1 with hepatitis C virus infection and concurrent increases in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST); and 1 each with acute hepatitis A infection, cholangiocarcinoma, cirrhosis, cholelithiasis with hepatosteatosis, liver abscesses due to extrapulmonary tuberculosis, and Hodgkin’s disease with liver metastases. In the remaining cases, most increases in direct bilirubin were transient, without clinical signs or manifestations of liver disease, and resolved without discontinuation of fostemsavir. Three participants discontinued the study because of hepatobiliary AEs (hepatic failure [2 cases], hepatic cytolysis [1 case], and hepatorenal syndrome [1 case]).

3.3.4 Pregnancies

Through the week 240 data cutoff, 6 participants became pregnant (although the protocol required the use of contraception). Per protocol and after a benefit–risk assessment by the investigator, participants were permitted to continue fostemsavir. Three pregnancies led to normal births of healthy infants with no complications after exposure to fostemsavir either in all 3 trimesters (2 cases) or the first trimester (1 case). Two pregnancies, with exposure to fostemsavir in all 3 trimesters, had complications (1 fetal growth restriction and 1 premature birth) but led to otherwise normal births of infants with no congenital abnormalities. One pregnancy ended in an elective abortion.

4 Discussion

Analysis of long-term data over a median follow-up of 258 weeks in BRIGHTE shows that fostemsavir was well tolerated with a safety profile that was consistent with previous results (8, 26). Infections and HIV-1 disease progression accounted for the majority of grade 3/4 AEs, SAEs, and deaths, likely reflecting the severity of immune compromise in the study population.

The remarkable CD4+ T-cell recovery seen at earlier time points was sustained through longer-term follow-up, with 75% of participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³ achieving ≥200 cells/mm³ at week 192. Exposure-adjusted rates of all-cause AEs, infection and infestation PTSIs, and AIDS-defining events were lower among participants with CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³ any time during the analysis period compared with those with sustained CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/mm³. These differences were less apparent in the NRC, which was smaller than the RC population (n=99 vs n=272) and also had a higher proportion of participants with more advanced HIV-1 disease. Notably, in the NRC, there were no emergent AIDS-defining events reported among participants with any on-treatment CD4+ T-cell count ≥200 cells/mm³. The improved immune function also likely explains the absence of serious sequelae or deaths among BRIGHTE participants who had COVID-19 infections.

The immunologic responses seen during treatment with fostemsavir-based regimens in BRIGHTE may be related to its unique mechanism of action. Temsavir, the active component of fostemsavir, binds directly to both membrane-associated and soluble gp120, preventing the entry of HIV-1 into host cells, and also possibly inhibiting antibody-dependent cytotoxicity of bystander CD4+ T-cells and activation of other downstream inflammatory pathways that may contribute to CD4+ T-cell death (30). Immunologic non-responders are an important population of people living with HIV who experience insufficient CD4+ T-cell count recovery despite persistent virologic suppression and have a higher risk of AIDS and non–AIDS-defining events and malignancies, as well as an increased risk of mortality (31–34). Attempts to improve CD4+ T-cell count in this population through antiretroviral treatment intensification with maraviroc and raltegravir have been unsuccessful (35–38). The potential role of fostemsavir in immunologic recovery is the subject of ongoing and future studies.

In BRIGHTE, there were 5 pregnancies with exposure to fostemsavir that were carried to term and resulted in live births of infants with no congenital abnormalities. Although there were very few cases and more data are needed, there are HTE individuals of childbearing potential who may benefit from fostemsavir.

Protocol-defined stopping criteria for QTc prolongation were met by 11 participants; 7 had ECG abnormalities at baseline, none had corresponding symptomatic cardiovascular events or evidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and 9 continued fostemsavir treatment after discontinuing from the study. In healthy volunteers, a fostemsavir dose of 1200 mg once daily did not produce clinically important QTc interval prolongation (defined as the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% CI of ddQTcF exceeding 10 ms); a supratherapeutic fostemsavir dose of 2400 mg twice daily resulted in a mean increase in QTcF interval of 11.2 ms (upper bound of 90% CI, 13.3 ms) (39).

Eight cases of IRIS occurred, all before week 96, 3 of which were serious. HIV-associated IRIS is a known complication in individuals who start antiretroviral therapy with advanced immunosuppression (as is the case with our study population) and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality (18, 19).

Through week 240, there were no new clinically relevant laboratory toxicities. Although 32% of treated participants experienced an emergent grade 3/4 serum creatinine elevation, results were confounded by identifiable risk factors for reduced renal function such as advanced HIV-1 disease, concomitant medications, and comorbidities. Many participants received concomitant medications known to influence creatinine (eg, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim), and the initial OBT for >80% of participants included dolutegravir (29). A causal relationship between fostemsavir and elevation in serum creatinine has not been established (3). There were no emergent grade 4 increases in direct bilirubin, and grade 3/4 increases in total bilirubin were infrequent. Most cases of grade 3 direct bilirubin elevation were minor, transient, asymptomatic, and resolved without discontinuation of fostemsavir. All 4 participants with ALT ≥3× ULN and total bilirubin ≥2× ULN had overlapping clinical events commonly associated with hepatobiliary inflammation.

Two unavoidable limitations of BRIGHTE, given the treatment needs of the target population, are the lack of a control arm beyond the initial short-term blinded period and variability of the individualized OBT. The complex clinical characteristics of the BRIGHTE population, with advanced HIV-related disease and multiple comorbidities with concomitant medications, further complicate interpretation of the results.

Cumulative safety findings through the BRIGHTE 240-week interim analysis show that fostemsavir has a favorable long-term safety and tolerability profile, attributes that are important for HTE individuals, who have few remaining treatment options, may have advanced disease and multiple comorbidities, and use complex treatment regimens. The reduced rates of AIDS-defining events and AEs in participants who achieved CD4+ T-cell count recovery highlight the importance of achieving immune recovery with a salvage regimen in the HTE population, as was seen in BRIGHTE. Additionally, fostemsavir has a drug-drug interaction profile that allows co-administration with most drugs prescribed for HIV-1 and associated comorbidities without dose adjustment (3, 40) and favorable tolerability in individuals with renal or hepatic impairment (41). These attributes, coupled with the robust week 240 virologic and immunologic response rates (21), support fostemsavir as an important treatment option for HTE individuals with multidrug-resistant HIV-1.

Data availability statement

The data sets presented in this article are not readily available due to privacy reasons. Anonymized individual participant data and study documents can be requested for further research from www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Ethics statement

The study involving humans was approved by Western Institutional Review Board (Puyallup, WA). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

JL: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Investigation. JA: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Investigation. SW: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Investigation. JV: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. CZ: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. BCR: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. BS: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Methodology. RS: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. AC: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. AT: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. AP: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. FD: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. BL: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. MW: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. SC: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. MW-S: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by ViiV Healthcare. The funder had a role in the study conception and design, data collection and analysis, and preparation of the manuscript. The decision to publish was made by the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all BRIGHTE clinical trial participants and their families and all BRIGHTE investigators. Editorial assistance was provided under the direction of the authors by Esther Race, PhD, Race Editorial Ltd, and Jennifer Rossi, MA, ELS, MedThink SciCom, and funded by ViiV Healthcare. Data included in this manuscript have previously been presented in part at 19th European AIDS Conference; October 18–21, 2024; Warsaw, Poland; Poster eP.A.093.

Conflict of interest

JL has participated in scientific advisory boards for Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, and ViiV Healthcare. JA has received grants from Emergent BioSolutions, Frontier Technologies, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Regeneron, and ViiV Healthcare, which were paid to her institution, and has participated in scientific advisory boards for GSK, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare. SW has received investigator-initiated grants from Gilead, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare and has participated in advisory boards for Merck and ViiV Healthcare. CZ has received grants from GSK. BCR has participated in advisory boards for Gilead, GSK, and ViiV Healthcare, and her institution has received grants for conducting clinical trials from Janssen and MSD. BS, RS, AC, AT, AP, FD, BL, MW, and MW-S are employees of GSK or ViiV Healthcare and may own stock in GSK. SC was an employee of ViiV Healthcare at the time of the study and may own stock in GSK.

The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1394644/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Armenia D, Di Carlo D, Flandre P, Bouba Y, Borghi V, Forbici F, et al. HIV MDR is still a relevant issue despite its dramatic drop over the years. J Antimicrob Chemother. (2020) 75:1301–10. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Pelchen-Matthews A, Borges ÁH, Reekie J, Rasmussen LD, Wiese L, Weber J, et al. Prevalence and outcomes for heavily treatment-experienced individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus in a European cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. (2021) 87:806–17. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Rukobia. [prescribing information]. Durham, NC: ViiV Healthcare (2024).

Google Scholar

4. Trogarzo. [prescribing information]. Montréal, Canada: Theratechnologies Inc (2023).

Google Scholar

5. Sunlenca. [prescribing information]. Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences, Inc (2022).

Google Scholar

6. Henegar C, Vannappagari V, Viswanathan S, DeKoven M, Clark A, Ackerman P, et al. Identifying heavily treatment-experienced patients in a large administrative claims database. In: Presented at: 10th IAS Conference on HIV Science; 2019 July 21-24; Mexico City, Mexico (2019).

Google Scholar

7. Cutrell J, Jodlowski T, Bedimo R. The management of treatment-experienced HIV patients (including virologic failure and switches). Ther Adv Infect Dis. (2020) 7:2049936120901395. doi: 10.1177/2049936120901395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lataillade M, Lalezari JP, Kozal M, Aberg JA, Pialoux G, Cahn P, et al. Safety and efficacy of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor prodrug fostemsavir in heavily treatment-experienced individuals: week 96 results of the phase 3 BRIGHTE study. Lancet HIV. (2020) 7:e740–51. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30240-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Priest J, Hulbert E, Gilliam BL, Burton T. Characterization of heavily treatment-experienced people with HIV and impact on health care resource utilization in US commercial and Medicare Advantage health plans. Open Forum Infect Dis. (2021) 8:ofab562. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab562

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ferrer E, Curto J, Esteve A, Miro JM, Tural C, Murillas J, et al. Clinical progression of severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected patients depends on virological and immunological improvement irrespective of baseline status. J Antimicrob Chemother. (2015) 70:3332–8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hoffmann C, Casado JL, Härter G, Vizcarra P, Moreno A, Cattaneo D, et al. Immune deficiency is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 in people living with HIV. HIV Med. (2021) 22:372–8. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kaplan R, Hermans S, Caldwell J, Jennings K, Bekker L-G, Wood R. HIV and TB co-infection in the ART era: CD4 count distributions and TB case fatality in Cape Town. BMC Infect Dis. (2018) 18:356. doi: 10.1186/s12879–018-3256–9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Raffetti E, Albini L, Gotti D, Segala D, Maggiolo F, di Filippo E, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality for all causes in HIV-infected patients over a quarter century: a multicentre cohort study. BMC Public Health. (2015) 15:235. doi: 10.1186/s12889–015-1565–0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ravimohan S, Tamuhla N, Steenhoff AP, Letlhogile R, Nfanyana K, Bellamy SL, et al. Immunological profiling of tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and non-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome death in HIV-infected adults with pulmonary tuberculosis starting antiretroviral therapy: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. (2015) 15:429–38. doi: 10.1016/S1473–3099(15)70008–3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Castilho JL, Turner M, Shepherd BE, Koethe JR, Furukawa SS, Bofill CE, et al. CD4/CD8 ratio and CD4 nadir predict mortality following noncommunicable disease diagnosis in adults living with HIV. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. (2019) 35:960–7. doi: 10.1089/AID.2019.0064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Han WM, Apornpong T, Kerr SJ, Hiransuthikul A, Gatechompol S, Do T, et al. CD4/CD8 ratio normalization rates and low ratio as prognostic marker for non-AIDS defining events among long-term virologically suppressed people living with HIV. AIDS Res Ther. (2018) 15:13. doi: 10.1186/s12981–018-0200–4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Mussini C, Lorenzini P, Cozzi-Lepri A, Lapadula G, Marchetti G, Nicastri E, et al. CD4/CD8 ratio normalisation and non-AIDS-related events in individuals with HIV who achieve viral load suppression with antiretroviral therapy: an observational cohort study. Lancet HIV. (2015) 2:e98–106. doi: 10.1016/S2352–3018(15)00006–5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV (2023). Available online at: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/sites/default/files/guidelines/documents/adult-adolescent-arv/guidelines-adult-adolescent-arv.pdf (Accessed December 19, 2023).

Google Scholar

19. European AIDS Clinical Society. EACS guidelines version 12.0 (2023). Available online at: https://www.eacsociety.org/media/guidelines-12.0.pdf (Accessed December 19, 2023).

Google Scholar

20. Aksak-Wąs BJ, Kowalska JD, Ząbek P, Serwin K, Rafalska-Kosior M, Gołąb J, et al. Immune restoration affects 10-year survival in people living with HIV/AIDS. HIV Med. (2023) 24:325–34. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Aberg JA, Shepherd B, Wang M, Madruga JV, Urbina FM, Katlama C, et al. Week 240 efficacy and safety of fostemsavir plus optimized background therapy in heavily treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1. Infect Dis Ther. (2023) 12:2321–35. doi: 10.1007/s40121–023-00870–6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Emu B, Fessel J, Schrader S, Kumar P, Richmond G, Win S, et al. Phase 3 study of ibalizumab for multidrug-resistant HIV-1. N Engl J Med. (2018) 379:645–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Hardy WD, Gulick RM, Mayer H, Fätkenheuer G, Nelson M, Heera J, et al. Two-year safety and virologic efficacy of maraviroc in treatment-experienced patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection: 96-week combined analysis of MOTIVATE 1 and 2. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. (2010) 55:558–64. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181ee3d82

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Steigbigel RT, Cooper DA, Teppler H, Eron JJ, Gatell JM, Kumar PN, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of raltegravir combined with optimized background therapy in treatment-experienced patients with drug-resistant HIV infection: week 96 results of the BENCHMRK 1 and 2 phase III trials. Clin Infect Dis. (2010) 50:605–12. doi: 10.1086/650002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Panel on Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in adults and adolescents with HIV (2023). Available online at: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/adult-andadolescent-opportunistic-infection (Accessed December 19, 2023).

Google Scholar

26. Kozal M, Aberg J, Pialoux G, Cahn P, Thompson M, Molina J-M, et al. Fostemsavir in adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:1232–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1902493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services. Division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric adverse events version 2.0 (2014). Available online at: https://rsc.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/daids-ae-grading-table-v2-nov2014.pdf (Accessed December 19, 2023).

Google Scholar

28. World Health Organization. Clinical features and prognostic factors of COVID-19 in people living with HIV hospitalized with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (2021). Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Clinical-HIV-2021.1 (Accessed December 19, 2023).

Google Scholar

29. Tivicay. [prescribing information]. Durham (2024). NC: ViiV Healthcare.

Google Scholar

30. Prévost J, Richard J, Medjahed H, Gasser R, Bourassa C, Brassard N, et al. Temsavir protects bystander cells from ADCC and blocks cytokine burst by monocytes. In: Presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2022 February 12-16; Virtual (2022)

Google Scholar

31. Yang X, Su B, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wu H, Zhang T. Incomplete immune reconstitution in HIV/AIDS patients on antiretroviral therapy: challenges of immunological non-responders. J Leukoc Biol. (2020) 107:597–612. doi: 10.1002/JLB.4MR1019-189R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Chammartin F, Mocroft A, Egle A, Zangerle R, Smith C, Mussini C, et al. Measures of longitudinal immune dysfunction and risk of AIDS and non-AIDS defining malignancies in antiretroviral treated people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Clin Infect Dis. (2024) 78:995–1004. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Noiman A, Esber A, Wang X, Bahemana E, Adamu Y, Iroezindu M, et al. Clinical factors and outcomes associated with immune non-response among virally suppressed adults with HIV from Africa and the United States. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:1196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04866-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Trickey A, Sabin CA, Burkholder G, Crane H, d'Arminio Monforte A, Egger M, et al. Life expectancy after 2015 of adults with HIV on long-term antiretroviral therapy in Europe and North America: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies. Lancet HIV. (2023) 10:e295–307. doi: 10.1016/S2352–3018(23)00028–0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Cuzin L, Trabelsi S, Delobel P, Barbuat C, Reynes J, Allavena C, et al. Maraviroc intensification of stable antiviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with poor immune restoration: MARIMUNO-ANRS 145 study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. (2012) 61:557–64. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318273015f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Massanella M, Negredo E, Puig J, Puertas MC, Buzón MJ, Pérez-Álvarez N, et al. Raltegravir intensification shows differing effects on CD8 and CD4 T cells in HIV-infected HAART-suppressed individuals with poor CD4 T-cell recovery. AIDS. (2012) 26:2285–93. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328359f20f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Rusconi S, Vitiello P, Adorni F, Colella E, Focà E, Capetti A, et al. Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial. PloS One. (2013) 8:e80157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. van Lelyveld SF, Drylewicz J, Krikke M, Veel EM, Otto SA, Richter C, et al. Maraviroc intensification of cART in patients with suboptimal immunological recovery: a 48-week, placebo-controlled randomized trial. PloS One. (2015) 10:e0132430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lagishetty C, Moore K, Ackerman P, Llamoso C, Magee M. Effects of temsavir, active moiety of antiretroviral agent fostemsavir, on QT interval: results from a phase I study and an exposure-response analysis. Clin Transl Sci. (2020) 13:769–76. doi: 10.1111/cts.12763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Rukobia. summary of product characteristics. Amersfoort, Netherlands: ViiV Healthcare BV (2023).

Google Scholar

41. Magee M, Slater J, Mannino F, Ackerman P, Llamoso C, Moore K. Effect of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of temsavir, the active moiety of fostemsavir. J Clin Pharmacol. (2021) 61:939–53. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1810

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar