Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 01 March 2024
Sec. Comparative Immunology

Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA modulates the immune response in Holstein cattle naturally infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis

Updated
  • 1Department of Animal Health, NEIKER-Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
  • 2Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain
  • 3Department of Applied Mathematics, NEIKER- Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
  • 4Center of Animal Biotechnology, Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Deva, Spain

Little is known about the role of alternative splicing (AS) in regulating gene expression in Mycobacteria-infected individuals in distinct stages of infection. Pre-mRNA AS consists of the removal of introns and the assembly of exons contained in eukaryotic genes. AS events can influence transcript stability or structure with important physiological consequences. Using RNA-Seq data from peripheral blood (PB) and ileocecal valve (ICV) samples collected from Holstein cattle with focal and diffuse paratuberculosis (PTB)-associated histopathological lesions in gut tissues and without lesions (controls), we detected differential AS profiles between the infected and control groups. Four of the identified AS events were experimentally validated by reverse transcription-digital droplet PCR (RT-ddPCR). AS events in several genes correlated with changes in gene expression. In the ICV of animals with diffuse lesions, for instance, alternatively spliced genes correlated with changes in the expression of genes involved in endocytosis, antigen processing and presentation, complement activation, and several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases in humans. Taken together, our results identified common mechanisms of AS involvement in the pathogenesis of PTB and human diseases and shed light on novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to control these diseases.

1 Introduction

Bovine paratuberculosis (PTB) (or Johne’s disease) is a granulomatous infection caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). PTB is a granulomatous enteritis of ruminants that must be notified to the World Organization for Animal Health. Several studies have demonstrated that more than 50% of the dairy cattle herds are positive for MAP antibodies in the USA and in Europe and, therefore, PTB can be considered endemic in these areas (1, 2). The dairy industry estimated that losses due to PTB each year are US$198 million in the United States, US$364 in the European Union, US$75 million in Germany, US$56 million in France, and US$12 million in Spain (3). Infection usually occurs at an early stage of life and can remain subclinical for years. In the jejunal-ileal Peyer’s patches, MAP bacilli gain entry into the intestinal mucosa via interaction with M cells and epithelial cells (4, 5). MAP can survive within infected macrophages by inhibiting apoptosis and phagosomal acidification, and by preventing the presentation of antigens to the immune system (6). As the infection progresses, the lesions in the intestine and lymph nodes become more severe and the granulomatous infiltrate becomes diffuse, disrupting the mucosal structure (7, 8). There is evidence suggesting that MAP might act as an environmental trigger of chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) such as Crohn´s disease and autoimmune diseases in humans, including multiple sclerosis (MS), Type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (9, 10). CIDs are a group of disorders of unclear etiology characterized by a persistent inflammation that ultimately damages the target organs and tissues (11). Several studies have demonstrated that molecular mimicry between MAP and human peptides activates responses associated with many human autoimmune diseases (12). However, the mechanisms linking MAP infection, human inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and immune dysregulation have not been fully elucidated. A better knowledge of these pathogen-host interactions may help to develop effective strategies to block common early pathogenic steps of these diseases.

One of the major response mechanisms that influences MAP infection outcome is host gene expression (13). Transcriptomics has been shown to be a useful tool for analyzing host gene expression changes from the latent infection to clinical disease, while functional genomics has been able to trace the molecular mechanisms that link MAP infection, host genetics, and disease outcome (14, 15). In a previous study, we found that the heterozygous genotype in the cis-eQTL-rs109859270 (C/T) was associated with the upregulation of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) mRNA expression and with an increased risk of progression to clinical PTB (16). By contrast, the most frequent homozygous genotype (C/C) maintained the U1 snRNA expression levels in a restricted range and was associated with a lower risk of infection and disease progression. These findings suggested that host genetics can significantly impact the expression of important components of the host splicing machinery and, consequently, may compromise the splicing of a subset of introns contributing to the disease outcome. In humans, many diseases are caused by point mutations that affect pre-mRNA splicing by destroying or weakening splice sites, thereby producing mRNAs that encode defective proteins or that are targets for degradation by the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) (17, 18).

For pre-mRNAs to be transported to the cytoplasm where they can direct protein synthesis, introns need to be removed. Pre-mRNA splicing consists of the removal of introns and assembly of exons contained in the eukaryotic genes by the spliceosome, a structure composed of highly dynamic snRNPs and accessory proteins, the most important one being the snRNP complex composed of U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNPs (19, 20). Spliceosome assembly starts with U1 binding to the dinucleotide GU at the 5′ splice site and the U2AF complex binding to the dinucleotide AG at the 3′ splice site. Then, U2 recognizes a key adenine called the branch point and interacts with U1 to form the pre-spliceosome. Following U4, U5, and U6 recruitment, the spliceosome enters its active conformation and proceeds to catalyze two sequential transesterification reactions that excise the intron (21). Splice sites are typically categorized as constitutive or alternative, depending on whether they are always (constitutive) or only sometimes (alternative) recognized by the spliceosome and spliced in the mature mRNA. Strong splice sites containing consensus sequences that are easily recognized by the spliceosome lead to constitutive splicing, whereas weak splice sites lead to alternative splicing (AS) and can only be recognized via the mediation of additional splicing regulatory elements. Depending on the splice site locations, AS events can be classified into different classes, including skipped exon (SE), in which a single exon is included or excluded from the final transcript; mutually exclusive exons (MXE), in which the final transcript only contains one of the two affected exons; alternative 3′ splice site (A3SS), in which the acceptor site (at 3′) is changed; alternative 5′ splice site (A5SS), in which the donor site (at 5′) is changed; and retained intron (RI), in which an intron gets included in the final transcript (Figure 1). AS events can have multiple detrimental consequences, one of them being the generation of premature termination codons, which are natural targets of the NMD pathway and can cause changes in gene expression (22, 23). Changes in AS events can cause disease directly, modify the severity of the disease phenotype, or be linked with disease susceptibility (24). Changes in AS events are responsible for infection, inflammation, and immune and metabolic diseases (25, 26).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the major types of AS events. AS events are defined by the location of the splice sites in the following types: skipped exon (SE), in which a single exon is included or excluded from the final transcript; mutually exclusive exons (MXE), in which the final transcript only contains one of the two affected exons; alternative 3′ splice site (A3SS), in which the acceptor site (at 3′) is changed; alternative 5’ splice site (A5SS), in which the donor site (at 5′) is changed; retained intron (RI), an intron or a portion of an intronic region gets included in the final transcript. Exons and introns are represented by boxes and solid lines, respectively. Dashed lines indicate possible acceptor-donor combinations. Exons included in all isoforms are in blue, while exons, exon sequences, and introns that can or cannot be included by splicing events are in orange or purple. CS, constitutive splicing; AS, Alternative splicing.

Little is known about the genome-wide post-transcriptional regulation after exposure to human or animal pathogens. Recently, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has become a novel powerful approach for the quantitative profiling of genome-wide pre-mRNA AS (27). For instance, previous studies using RNA-Seq have reported that the infection of human macrophages with Mycobacterium tuberculosis results in massive alterations in the pattern of AS in human macrophages and in epithelial and macrophage cell lines (28, 29). In cattle, the differential AS patterns of transcript sequences between healthy cows and those naturally infected with Staphylococcus aureus were compared to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying mastitis resistance and susceptibility (30, 31). Using surgically isolated intestinal segments, significant changes in AS events between MAP-infected and non-infected tissues within the same calf were detected 1-month post-infection (32). In the present study, the absence or presence of PTB-associated lesions was used to define the stage of MAP infection and compare the AS profiles of animals with focal or diffuse lesions vs. uninfected cattle without lesions in gut tissues. Four of the identified AS events were experimentally validated by reverse transcription-digital droplet PCR (RT-ddPCR). Next, we assessed whether the AS events identified in the present study impacted gene expression. Subsequently, genes with changes in AS events and mRNA expression between animal groups were used in functional analysis to identify enriched gene ontologies and metabolic pathways in cows with lesions of distinct severity.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Ethics statement

The study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org). The Animal Ethics Committee of the Servicio Regional de Investigation y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA) approved the procedures on the animals included in this study. All procedures were authorized by the Regional Consejería de Agroganadería y Recursos Autóctonos of the Principality of Asturias (approval code PROAE 29/2015 and PROAE 66/2019) and were carried out following the European Guidelines for the Care and Use of Animals for Research Purposes (2012/63/EU). PB, gut tissues, and fecal samples were collected by trained personnel and in accordance with good veterinary practices.

2.2 Animals and PTB diagnosis

Peripheral blood (PB) and ileocecal valve (ICV) samples were collected from 14 female Holstein Friesian cows from a single commercial dairy farm in Asturias (Spain) at the time of slaughter. Their PTB infection status was determined by histopathological analysis of gut tissues. The Mycobacterium paratuberculosis Antibody test (IDEXX laboratories, Hoofddrop, the Netherlands) was used for the detection of MAP antibodies. Fecal and gut tissue bacteriological culture and PCR were carried out as previously described (13, 33). The post-mortem diagnostic results are displayed in Supplementary Table 1. All control animals (N= 4) showed a negative result for all diagnostic tests. In contrast, the infected group had either focal (N= 5) or diffuse (N= 5) lesions in gut tissues. The average age of the animals without lesions and with focal and diffuse lesions was 5.45, 5.09, and 4.38 years old, respectively.

2.3 RNA extraction, RNA-Seq library preparation, sequencing, and differential gene expression analysis

RNA extraction from PB and ICV samples, RNA-Seq library preparation, and sequencing were performed as previously described (13). Briefly, total RNA was purified from the PB samples using the PAXgene blood RNA kit according to the manufacturer´s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). For RNA isolation, 150–200 mg of ICV was harvested and immediately submerged in 2 ml of RNAlater (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Purification of RNA was performed using an RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Approximately 250 ng of RNA was used for RNA-Seq library preparation using an Illumina NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library preparation kit following the manufacturer´s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). RNA-Seq libraries were single-end sequenced in a 1 × 75 bp format using an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer at the Genomic Unit of the Madrid Science Park, Spain. Quality control of the sequence data was assessed using FASTQC 0.11.9 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The 13 bp Illumina standard adapters were removed using the trimming software Trim Galore! 0.6.5. (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore). Trimmed reads were subsequently aligned to the Bos taurus reference genome (ARS-UCD1.2, INSDC Assembly GCA_002263795.2) using the Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference aligner (STAR) 2.5.3a software (34). In addition to the unbiased de novo detection of canonical junctions, STAR can discover alternative splices and chimeric transcripts and can map full-length RNA sequences. The program required a GTF file containing all Bos taurus coding transcripts, which was downloaded from Ensembl (Bos_taurus.ARS-UCD1.2.100.gtf). For each library, the resulting alignments (.bam files) were used to generate a table of counts for each gene using the FeatureCounts function from the Rsubread 2.4.2. package (35). Gene counts were then normalized with the mean-of-ratios method included in the DESeq2 1.30.0 package (36). DESeq2 was also used to perform differential gene expression analysis for all comparisons: cows with focal lesions vs. controls, diffuse lesions vs. controls, and diffuse vs. focal lesions. A gene was considered as differentially expressed if its false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted P-value (PFDR) was lower than 0.05 after correction for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method (37).

2.4 Identification of differential AS events between infected and control cows

Using the mapped reads (.bam) and Ensembl’s annotation gtf file as inputs, the replicate multivariate analysis of transcript splicing software (rMATS 3.2.5) was used to detect differential AS events between RNA-Seq samples. rMATS annotates the AS types (SE, MXE, A3SS, A5SS, and RI), uses a hierarchical framework to account for estimation uncertainty in individual replicates, and models exon inclusion levels, referred to as percent spliced-in (PSI) (38). rMATS normalizes the lengths of individual splice variants and uses a likelihood-ratio test to calculate whether the difference in the mean PSI values between two sample groups is significant. The pipeline used for differential gene expression and AS analysis is described in Figure 2.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Pipeline. The pipeline started with the raw reads, which were mapped to the Bos taurus genome. Next, AS events between groups were compared. Finally, genes with differential AS and expression between groups were identified and used in functional analysis.

2.5 Validation of Identified Differential AS Events by reverse transcription-digital droplet PCR

The quantification of exon inclusion levels in four of the AS events identified with rMATS was carried out using RT-ddPCR. Two primer pairs were designed for the validation of each event; one to amplify the exon present in each event type, and the other to amplify the exon present in all isoforms annotated in the Ensembl database. First, 10 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using an RT2 First Strand Kit according to the manufacturer´s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The reaction mixes of each ddPCR assay included 10 µl of 2x QX200™ ddPCR™ EvaGreen® Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 1µl of 4 µM of each primer, 1 µl of cDNA, and 7 µl of DEPC-treated H2O. A negative control without DNA was also included. Each mixed sample was pipetted into a DG8™ Cartridge (Bio-Rad, USA) previously loaded with 70 µl of droplet generation oil for Eva Green ® (Bio-Rad, USA). The cartridge was covered with a DG8™ Gasket (Bio-Rad, USA) and placed into a QX200 Droplet Generator (Bio-Rad, USA) to perform droplet generation. The droplets were transferred to a 96-well plate (Bio-Rad, USA) with a RAININ p-50 pipette, and the plate was sealed with pierceable foil at 180°C for 5 s using a PX1™ PCR Plate Sealer (Bio-Rad, USA). The PCR plate was placed in a T100™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, USA) for PCR using the following cycling conditions: an initial denaturation cycle at 95°C for 30 s was followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. A final signal stabilization cycle at 4°C for 5 min followed by 90°C at 5 min was performed. The plate was then read using a QX200 Droplet Reader (Bio-Rad, USA), and the quantification of target DNA was performed using QuantaSoftAnalysis Pro (version 1.0.596) (Bio-Rad, USA). The concentration of each DNA sample in the original reaction was obtained using the following formula:

copiesμl(in original sample)=(copiesμl(in ddPCR reaction))AB

A: Total volume of the ddPCR reaction mix (µl)

B: Total DNA loaded to the ddPCR reaction mix (µl)

The PSI value of each event was calculated by dividing the copies/µl obtained from the ddPCR of the inclusion isoform by the copies/µl obtained from the ddPCR of the sequence present in all isoforms. Finally, the ΔPSI for each comparison was calculated as the average of the PSIs of the control group minus the average of the PSIs of the samples from cows with focal or diffuse lesions. For the comparisons of cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions, the average of the PSIs of the focal group minus the average of the PSIs of the samples from cows with diffuse lesions was calculated.

2.6 Functional enrichment analysis

Genes with differential AS events and mRNA expression between groups were investigated for the enrichment of gene ontologies (biological processes, cellular components, and biological functions) and KEGG pathways using the ClusterProfiler package (39) and the STRING database (40). The Benjamini–Hochberg method was applied to adjust for multiple testing, considering a PFDR≤ 0.05 as significant. The function of the candidate genes was identified in GeneCards by searching for their gene symbol.

3 Results

3.1 AS events of pre-mRNA in PB and ICV from MAP-infected animals vs. controls

Using RNA-Seq data from the animals included in the study, AS differences in PB and ICV samples between infected cows with focal or diffuse lesions vs. controls and between cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions were identified using the software rMATS 3.2.5 (38). Using the rMATS output, we annotated the number and frequency of each AS event (A5SS, A3SS, RI, MXE, and SE) by calculating the PSI value, which represents the frequency in which a specific exon is included in the final transcript. The cut-off for the detection of significant AS events was set at PFDR≤ 0.05. Our results evidenced differential AS patterns between infected animals with focal and diffuse PTB-associated lesions vs. the control animals and with diffuse vs. focal lesions (Figure 3). We found a higher number of AS events in ICV samples than in PB samples. In the PB samples, 232, 260, and 294 AS events were identified in the comparisons of cows with focal lesions vs. controls, diffuse lesions vs. controls, and diffuse vs. focal lesions, respectively (Figure 4A). AS profiling of ICV samples showed 385, 415, and 262 AS events in the comparison of cows with focal lesions vs. controls, diffuse lesions vs. controls, and diffuse vs. focal lesions, respectively (Figure 4B). The number of alternatively spliced genes identified in PB and ICV samples for each comparison are presented in Figures 4C, D, respectively. The total number of significant AS events found in all comparisons is presented in Table 1, the most frequent type being SE, followed by MXE and RI, and the less frequent ones being A3SS and A5SS. Data analysis revealed 96 and 122 AS events that were common in the PB and ICV samples, respectively, of the infected animals regardless of the type of lesion. A total of 26 and 38 AS events were common in PB and ICV samples of the animals with focal and diffuse lesions vs. control cows, respectively. Finally, 16 AS events were common in the PB and ICV samples of the infected animals regardless of the specific type of lesion. Although some AS events were common in PB and ICV samples, we also found tissue-specific AS events. Table 2 shows the five AS events with the highest ΔPSI for each comparison.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Results of the AS differential analysis. Volcano plots representing the differential AS events (∆PSI value vs –log10 [p-value]) for each comparison. (A) PB samples of cows with focal lesions vs. controls. (B) PB samples of cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls. (C) PB samples of cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions. (D) ICV samples of cows with focal lesions vs. controls. (E) ICV samples of cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls. (F) ICV samples of cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions. The red spots represent the differential AS events in each comparison (PFDR≤ 0.05).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Venn diagrams showing the number of differential and common AS events and target genes between the three comparisons. Number of differential and common AS events in PB (A) and ICV (B) samples from cows with focal lesions vs. controls, with diffuse lesions vs. controls, and with diffuse vs. focal lesions. Number of differential and common AS genes in PB (C) and ICV (D) samples from cows with focal lesions vs. controls, with diffuse lesions vs controls, and with diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Differential AS events in each comparison and common AS events between comparisons.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 The five AS events with the highest ΔPSI in PB and ICV samples from MAP-infected cows vs. controls and between cows with diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions.

3.2 Validation of some of the identified AS events in PB samples by RT-ddPCR

AS events can potentially be used as disease biomarkers and their detection by RT-ddPCR can be performed in blood samples of live animals. Therefore, for further validation by RT-ddPCR, we selected four events among the AS events with the highest ΔPSI in PB samples. One of the selected events, ev17006 (SE-type, ΔPSI= 0.441), targeted the Thiamine Triphosphatase (THTPA) gene and was identified in the comparison of cows with focal lesions vs. controls. The ΔPSI of this SE event was positive, which means that the exon is more frequently skipped in cows with focal lesions than in the controls. Events ev7202 (ΔPSI= 0.479) and ev6205 (ΔPSI= 0.316) were identified in the comparison of cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls and targeted Potassium Channel Tetramerization Domain Containing (KCTD20) and Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 1 (NCOA1), respectively. Both were SE events, had a positive ΔPSI, and, therefore, the exons were more frequently skipped in cows with diffuse lesions than in the controls. An MXE event (ev1704) with a positive ΔPSI (ΔPSI= 0.343) was identified in cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions, and it was selected for validation because this specific event targeted the bovine leukocyte antigen (BOLA) gene, which plays an important role in antigen processing and presentation. Two primer pairs were designed for the validation of each event (Supplementary Table 2); one to amplify the exon present in each event type, and the other to amplify the exon present in all isoforms annotated in the Ensembl database. The results of the RT-ddPCR assays are presented in Figure 5 and were expressed as ΔPSI to be comparable with the in silico results obtained with rMATS. All the events analyzed with RT-ddPCR showed positive ΔPSI values, as previously obtained with rMATS.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 RT-ddPCR validation of four AS events identified in silico with rMATS. Four of the AS events with the highest ΔPSIs, ev17006, ev6205, ev7202, and ev1704, were experimentally validated by RT-ddPCR. Two primer pairs were designed for the validation of each event; one to amplify the exon present in each event type, and the other to amplify the exon present in all isoforms annotated in the Ensembl database. The PSI value of each event was calculated by dividing the copies/µl obtained from the ddPCR of the inclusion isoform by the copies/µl obtained from the ddPCR of the sequence present in all isoforms. The ΔPSI for each comparison was calculated as the average of the PSIs of the control group minus the average of the PSIs of the samples from cows with focal or diffuse lesions. For the comparisons of cows with diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions, the average of the PSIs of the focal group minus the average of the PSIs of the samples from cows with diffuse lesions was calculated. Changes in the AS events (expressed as ΔPSI) calculated using RNA-Seq and RT-ddPCR are presented in yellow and grey, respectively.

3.3 Functional analysis of the alternatively spliced genes

We performed a functional analysis with the genes undergoing AS for each comparison using ClusterProfiler and STRING. The enriched GOs and pathways identified in the PB and ICV samples are presented in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4, respectively. In the PB samples, the AS events identified in cows with focal lesions vs. controls affected genes playing important roles in endocytosis (bta:04144) and associated with viral infections caused by viruses able to establish long latent infections, such as the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) (bta:05169) and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection (bta:05167). These three pathways were enriched in three common alternatively spliced genes; BOLA, class I histocompatibility antigen Gogo-C*0202 alpha chain (LOC509006), and JNK-stimulatory Phosphatase-1 (JSP.1). In the comparison of cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls, we detected the enrichment of several genes with AS events, such as leukocyte surface Antigen CD53, Dendritic Cell-Associated Lectin 2 (CLEC12A), Natural Resistance-Associated Macrophage Protein 1 (SLC11A1), and T Cell-Interacting, Activating Receptor on Myeloid Cells 1 (TARM1) involved in clathrin (CLTA)-mediated endocytosis, neutrophil degranulation, and platelet activation. In the comparison of cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions, enrichment of AS events in genes belonging to the lysosome (bta:04142) and amoebiasis (bta:05146) pathways was detected. In the ICV samples of the infected cows, genes that encode for proteins with RNA-binding and coiled-coil domains showed differential AS patterns when compared with the control group. In the comparison of cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions, enrichment of genes that encode for proteins with coiled-coil domains and bromodomains and involved in AS was found.

3.4 Identification of genes displaying changes in AS and gene expression

In the PB samples of cows with focal lesions vs. controls, we did not identify genes displaying changes in AS and gene expression. The genes displaying changes in AS and gene expression are shown in Supplementary Table 5. In the PB samples from cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls, we found two SE events (ev75562 and ev14014) with negative ΔPSI values (less frequent in cows with diffuse lesions than in the controls) that were associated with the downregulation of Flotillin-1 (FLOT1) (fold change= -1.186), a gene involved in the formation of caveolae-like vesicles, and Triggering Receptor Expressed On Myeloid Cells Like 2 (TREML2) (fold change= -1.081), a counter-receptor for CD276 that enhances T-cell activation, respectively. The event ev3194 was less frequent in cows with diffuse lesions than in controls (ΔPSI= −0.26) and associated with the dysregulation of Cytochrome P450 Family 4 Subfamily V Member 2 (CYP4V2) (fold change= 0.071), a gene involved in fatty acid metabolism. In the comparison of cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions, ev13968 was most frequent in cows with diffuse lesions (ΔPSI= 0.004) and associated with the downregulation of Pepsinogen A5 (PGA5) (fold= −2.406), which functions in the digestion of dietary proteins. In the ICV samples, 1, 47, and 24 events had a differential frequency of appearance in the comparisons of cows with focal lesions vs. controls, diffuse lesions vs. controls, and diffuse vs. focal lesions, respectively. In the first of these comparisons, the SE ev1886 (ΔPSI= −0.277) was less frequent in cows with focal lesions than in the controls and was associated with the dysregulation of Cytochrome P450 Family 4 Subfamily F Member 2 (CYP4F2) (fold= 1.097), an enzyme that starts the process of inactivating and degrading leukotriene B4, a potent mediator of inflammation. The AS events identified in the comparisons of cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls and diffuse vs. focal lesions and the effect of these events on gene expression are graphically presented in Figures 6A, B, respectively. As seen in Figure 6, most of the AS events were associated with the upregulation of the expression of their target genes. Some genes involved in antigen-presentation and processing and inflammatory response, including BOLA, BOLA-NC1, Interferon Gamma-Inducible Protein 30 (IFI30), Interleukin 2 Receptor Subunit Gamma (IL2RG), and Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), were upregulated and affected by changes in AS in both comparisons.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Genes displaying changes in AS and gene expression. Heatmaps representing genes with changes in AS and expression in ICV samples of cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls (A) and diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions (B).

3.5 Functional analysis of genes displaying changes in both AS and gene expression

We performed a functional analysis with the genes displaying changes in both AS and gene expression. As seen in Table 3, GOs and metabolic pathways were only identified in the ICV samples from cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls and with diffuse vs. focal lesions. In both comparisons, truncated transcripts correlated with the increased expression levels of several genes, including BOLA and BOLA-NC1, which are involved in endocytosis (bta:04144), antigen processing and presentation (bta:04612), type I diabetes mellitus (bta04940), allograft rejection (bta05330), graft-versus-host disease (bta:05332), autoimmune thyroid disease (bta:05320), viral myocarditis (bta05416), and human T cell leukemia virus 1 infection (bta:05166). In the comparisons of cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions, AS events were associated with the upregulation of the complement C2 and C4A genes involved in complement activation (GO:006956 and GO:006958), humoral immune response mediated by circulating immunoglobulins (Ig) (GO:0002455), Igs-mediated immune response (GO:00160664), and B-cell-mediated immunity (GO:0019724), and with the pathogenesis of several human diseases such as Pertussis (bta:05133), an acute respiratory infectious disease caused by Bordetella Pertussis, and Staphylococcus aureus infection (bta:05150). In the comparison of cows with diffuse vs. focal lesions, three genes (IFI30, PSAP, and ASAH1) involved in the lysis of vacuoles by lysosomes and MHC class II-restricted antigen processing showed changes in AS and were upregulated in cows with diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Functional analysis using the genes with AS and mRNA expression dysregulation in the ICV samples.

4 Discussion

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing RNA technology and computational tools have greatly facilitated AS profiling (41). Using RNA-Seq data from the peripheral blood, jejunum, and salivary gland of Holstein cows classified as positive or negative according to ELISA and fecal PCR results, 119, 150, and 68 differential AS events were identified, respectively (32). In this study, however, only 14 alternatively spliced genes were significantly enriched for immune-related pathways. PTB-associated focal lesions in gut tissues can be detected before fecal shedding and MAP antibodies, and therefore, examining the AS profiles of animals according to histopathological results facilitates the identification of animals in the subclinical stage of the infection when the lesions in gut tissues remain focalized and the amount of MAP and anti-MAP antibodies are undetected with current pre-mortem diagnostic methods. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first genome-wide profiling of AS events in PB and ICV from Holstein cows with PTB-associated lesions of distinct severity vs. uninfected cattle without lesions in gut tissues.

Although MAP infection has been associated with several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases in humans, common mechanisms linking the pathogenesis of these diseases have not been proposed. AS is a highly controlled cellular process and most disruptions in AS events lead to autoimmunity and pathological inflammatory conditions (26, 42). In our study, we discovered that many of the identified alternatively spliced genes belonged to families or functional groups related to the host immune response. This suggests that some of the identified AS events might be coordinately regulated to achieve more robust control over the activity of the immune system. Interestingly, we observed that overlapping mechanisms affected by AS were associated with the pathogenesis of PTB and several infectious, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases in humans. In Figure 7, we present a graphical summary of the identified alternative spliced genes and key molecular mechanisms at the crosstalk of PTB and human inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. As it has been demonstrated that AS plays a major role in many human diseases through the manipulation of essential/functional protein domains with bovine orthologues, MAP-infected cattle could be used as a useful model for these human diseases (43).

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7 Diagram showing the main alternatively spliced genes involved in MAP immunopathogenesis and several human diseases. Alternatively spliced genes and pathways identified in the peripheral blood and ileocecal valve of cattle with distinct PTB-associate lesions are represented in the right and left side of the figure, respectively. In the PB of cows with focal lesions, alternatively spliced genes involved in the endocytosis and recognition of antigens (BOLA and LOC50906) might contribute to immune tolerance to MAP antigens by similar mechanisms, as observed in EBV and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infections. Although the AS of genes involved in neutrophil degranulation and platelet activation may control MAP growth and stimulate the development of granulomas, AS of genes involved in the lysis of MAP-containing phagosomes might lead to apoptosis and disruption of the intestinal mucus layer by similar mechanisms as seen in humans infected with Entamoeba histolytica. In ICV samples of cattle with diffuse lesions, AS and the upregulation of genes involved in endocytosis and antigen processing and presentation (BOLA and BOLA-NC1) might activate an uncontrolled pro-inflammatory response. Uncontrolled antigen presentation and processing and complement activation have been associated with several human inflammatory and autoimmune human diseases. Alternatively spliced genes, enriched pathways, and associated human diseases are present in black, green, and pink, respectively. Created with BioRender.com.

In the comparison of PB samples from cows with focal lesions vs. controls, several of the AS events identified in this comparison targeted genes involved in different endocytosis (bta:04144) steps, including BOLA, LOC509006, clathrin (CLTA), Dynamin-2 (DNM2), CLTA Adaptor Complex AP2, Mu Subunit (AP2M1), Cytohesin 1 (CYTH1), Dual Specificity Phosphatase 22 (JSP.1), RAB11 Family Interacting Protein 5 (RAB11FIP5), the apoptosis regulator (PRKC1), ArfGAP With RhoGAP Domain, and Ankyrin Repeat And PH Domain 1 (ARAP1). CLTA functions as the main structural component of the lattice-type cytoplasmic face of coated pits and vesicles that entrap specific macromolecules during receptor-mediated endocytosis. DNM2 is responsible for the release of CLTA-coated vesicles from the plasma membrane and AP2M1 is required for the activity of a vacuolar ATPase, which is responsible for proton pumping that occurs in the acidification of endosomes and lysosomes. CYTH1 regulates the adhesiveness of integrins at the plasma membrane and is involved in membrane trafficking and PRKC1 negatively regulates apoptosis. After entry into the host cell by endocytosis, MAP can survive in infected macrophages within phagosomes by inhibiting apoptosis and phagosome acidification, and by preventing the presentation of antigens to the immune system (6). In this context, our findings suggest that the AS of genes involved in the endocytosis pathway might contribute to phagosome maturation arrest and MAP persistence within the macrophages of cows with focal lesions in gut tissues. Similarly, infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Rv strain) induced AS of RAB8B, a protein involved in intracellular vesicle transport, which helps the survival of H37Rv in THP1-infected macrophages (28).

In the comparison of PB samples from cows with focal lesions vs. controls, we also identified AS events in genes associated with the pathogenesis of viral infections caused by herpesvirus that infect human populations predominantly at an early age but remain mostly asymptomatic, such as the Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection (bta:05167) and EBV infection (bta:05169). Both viruses as MAP can establish a lifelong latency and survive against the host´s innate and adaptive immune mechanisms. More specifically, MAP infection results in the AS of some genes associated with the pathogenesis of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus and EBV infections, including BOLA, LOC509006, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase 7 (MAP2K7), TNF Receptor Associated Factor 3 (TRAF3), Interferon Regulatory Factor 7 (IRF7), Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Delta (PIK3CD), and JSP.1. IRF7 has been shown to play an important role in the regulation of EBV latency and EBV-encoded latent infection membrane protein-1 (LMP1) can interact with TRAF3 and several other members of the TRAF family (44). TRAF3 acts as a negative NF-κβ regulator, possibly to avoid an unregulated inflammatory response (45). Our findings suggest that the AS of the BOLA, LOC509006, MAP2K7, TRAF3, IRF7, PIK3CD, and JSP.1 genes might contribute to the development of focalized PTB-associated lesions and establishment of the latent stage of MAP infection as it has been observed in EBV and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus latency. Interestingly, MAP and EBV were proposed as the main pathogens involved in the dysregulation pathways linked to RA (46).

In the comparison of PB samples from cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls, we identified AS genes involved in CLTA-mediated endocytosis, neutrophil degranulation, and platelet activation pathways. More specifically, AS of genes belonging to the neutrophil degranulation and platelet activation pathways, including CD53, CLEC12A, SLC11A1, and TARM1, was observed. CD53 contributes to the transduction of CD2-generated signals in T cells and natural killer cells and TARM1 increases the Toll-like receptor-mediated production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by macrophages and neutrophils. CLE12A and SLC11A1 (also known as natural-resistance-associated macrophage protein 1 [NRAMP1]) are both associated with innate host resistance. SLC11A1 is a membrane transporter involved in iron metabolism that is expressed in late endosomal/lysosomal compartments of macrophages. Polymorphisms in this gene have been associated with susceptibility to mycobacterial diseases such as PTB, tuberculosis, and leprosy, human inflammatory diseases such as Crohn´s disease, and autoimmune diseases such as RA, MS, and T1DM (10). Kissler et al. demonstrated that SLC11A1 gene silencing using RNAi in mice reduced the frequency of T1DM and protected against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, demonstrating a role for SLC11A1 in autoimmunity (47). In the PB of cows with diffuse lesions, AS events in antibacterial genes (CD53, CLEC12A, SLC11A1, and TARM1) involved in neutrophil degranulation and platelet activation were observed. Several in vivo studies demonstrated that neutrophils phagocytose Mycobacteria from dying Mycobacteria-infected macrophages within the nascent granuloma but simultaneously potentiate inflammation and tissue damage (48, 49). Similarly, uncontrolled activation of neutrophils has been shown to play an important role in human autoimmune and inflammatory diseases by exacerbating inflammation and tissue destruction (46). Therefore, the negative regulation of polymorphonuclear cell functions is anticipated to have significant pharmacological utility in treating the inflammation that is characteristic of the early clinical stage of PTB, as well as several human inflammatory and autoimmune illnesses (50).

In the comparison of PB from cows with diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions, we found several genes (ACTN1, TGFβ2, ITGβ2, and C8G) with AS events associated with the lysosome (bta:04142) and amoebiasis (bta:05146) caused by Entamoeba histolytica, a human extracellular protozoan parasite that like MAP invades the intestinal epithelium. The infection with Entamoeba histolytica occurs upon ingestion of contaminated water and food and involves parasite attachment and disruption of the intestinal mucus layer, followed by apoptosis of host epithelial cells (51). Intestinal tissue destruction causes severe dysentery and ulcerations in amoebic colitis. Moreover, the parasite can cause extraintestinal infections, such as amoebic liver abscesses, by evading the host immune response (52). MAP infection also impacts the intestinal mucosa and over time causes serious damage to the ileum and jejunum, diarrhea, progressive wasting, and the eventual death of the infected animal in the more advanced stages of clinical PTB (8). We propose that the AS of several genes associated with the activation of the lysosomes and amoebiasis might also cause disruption of the intestinal mucus layer, apoptosis, and MAP dissemination to other organs and tissues as seen in humans infected with Entamoeba histolytica. In the ICV samples of the infected cows, alternatively spliced genes that encode proteins with RNA-binding domains and coiled-coil domains critical for splicing activity, and involved in AS, were identified. As RNA splicing is regulated by cis-regulatory elements in pre-mRNA and trans-regulatory elements, mainly RNA-binding proteins, AS of RNA-binding proteins may in turn affect the splicing of other pre-mRNAs and contribute to the various onsets of PTB.

Our study also provides evidence of a relationship between AS patterns and gene expression regulation in distinct stages of MAP infection, as several genes were altered in both splicing and expression patterns in the ICV samples. In the ICV of animals with diffuse lesions, for instance, truncated transcripts correlated with increased expression levels of several genes involved in endocytosis (bta:04144) and antigen processing and presentation (bta:04612), including BOLA and BOLA-NC1. In cattle, the MHC region is termed BOLA and is involved in the processing and presentation of antigens to intestinal epithelial gamma delta T cells. BOLA genes are highly polymorphic, which leads to variation in the animal’s ability to recognize and present antigens, making some animals more susceptible to infection and disease than others. The human homologs of these genes have been also associated with several viral and autoimmune diseases, such as type I diabetes mellitus (bta:04940), Graft-versus-host disease (bta:05332), autoimmune thyroid disease (bta:05320), viral myocarditis (bta:05416), and human T cell leukemia virus 1 infection (bta:05166). In the comparisons of cows with diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions, AS events were associated with the upregulation of the BOLA, BOLA-NC1, and complement C2 and C4A genes involved in complement activation (GO:006958 and GO:006958), humoral immune response mediated by circulating Ig (GO:0002455), Ig-mediated immune response (GO:00160664), and B-cell-mediated immunity (GO:0019724), highlighting the activation of the humoral immune response observed in the more advanced stages of clinical PTB. C2 and C4A expression has been associated with the pathogenesis of human diseases caused by Bordetella pertussis (bta:05133) and Staphylococcus aureus infections (bta:05150). These findings are supported by the discovery that changes in the AS of C4A were increased when Staphylococcus aureus mastitis developed (53). Furthermore, components of the complement system, such as C1S, C2, C3, C4A, C6, C7, and C8 genes, were differentially expressed and underwent AS in mammary gland tissues of cows naturally infected with Staphylococcus aureus (31). Interestingly, the bovine C4A gene is closely linked to the MHC class II region on Bos taurus chromosome 23, which shows a significant association with susceptibility to intramammary infections (54, 55). In the comparison of cows with diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions, three alternatively spliced genes (IFI30, PSAP, and ASAH1) involved in the lysis of vacuoles by lysosomes and MHC class II-restricted antigen processing were upregulated. Altogether, our data identify potential mechanistic biomarkers and novel opportunities for the development of splicing-based therapies for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

5 Conclusion

Earlier studies have focused on the role of transcription in setting up the host response against pathogens. In this study, we addressed the underexplored role of AS in regulating gene expression and the host immune response in MAP-infected cattle. This wide analysis of AS events is still rare in human research, and even more so in a veterinary context. Furthermore, our study seeks to explore differences in alternative splicing events taking place in immune-associated pathways that could be paralleled to human inflammatory and infectious diseases. Our results demonstrated that MAP infection causes changes in AS in cows with different PTB outcomes. In the PB of cows with focal lesions, alternatively spliced genes involved in the endocytosis and recognition of MAP antigens might contribute to immune tolerance to MAP antigens, as observed in EBV and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infections in humans. In the PB samples of cows with diffuse lesions vs. controls, the AS of genes involved in neutrophil degranulation and platelet activation may simultaneously control MAP growth and facilitate granuloma formation. As the infection progresses to a clinical stage, AS of genes involved in the lysis of MAP-containing phagosomes might lead to apoptosis and disruption of the intestinal mucus layer by similar mechanisms as seen in humans infected with Entamoeba histolytica. In ICV samples of cattle with diffuse lesions vs. focal lesions, AS and the upregulation of genes involved in endocytosis and antigen processing and presentation might activate an uncontrolled pro-inflammatory response characteristic of the clinical disease. Uncontrolled antigen presentation and complement activation have also been associated with several inflammatory and autoimmune human diseases. Overall, our results identify the AS of important immune genes as a mechanistic link between PTB in cattle and many inflammatory and autoimmune human diseases and provide important clues for future therapies in human pathologies.

Data availability statement

RNA-Seq raw data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under the accession number GSE137395. The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by The Animal Ethics Committee of the Servicio Regional de Investigation y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

GB: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. JL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. RC: Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. MA: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Financial support for this study was provided by the National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA) (RTA2014-00009; RTI2018-094192, PID2021-122197OR), MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and FEDER, “Una manera de hacer Europa”. Funds were also provided by the Gobierno del Principado de Asturias Regional funds PCTI 2021–2023 (GRUPIN: IDI2021-000102) co-funded by FEDER. GBB was awarded a fellowship from INIA and MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and “FSE Invierte en tu futuro” (PRE2019-090562).

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are due to SERIDA farm´s workers and veterinarians for their collaboration with sample collection. We would like to thank the i2basque Research and Academic Network for computational support. We are grateful to Kyle P. Hearn for the careful editing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1354500/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Nielsen SS, Toft N. A review of prevalences of paratuberculosis in farmed animals in Europe. Prev Vet Med. (2009) 88:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lombard JE. Epidemiology and economics of paratuberculosis. Vet Clinics North America: Food Anim Pract. (2011) 27:525–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.07.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Rasmussen P, Barkema HW, Mason S, Beaulieu E, Hall DC. Economic losses due to Johne’s disease (paratuberculosis) in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. (2021) 104:3123–43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hines ME, Stiver S, Giri D, Whittington L, Watson C, Johnson J, et al. Efficacy of spheroplastic and cell-wall competent vaccines for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in experimentally-challenged baby goats. Vet Microbiol. (2007) 120:261–83. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.10.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bermudez LE, Petrofsky M, Sommer S, Barletta RG. Peyer’s Patch-Deficient Mice Demonstrate That Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Translocates across the Mucosal Barrier via both M Cells and Enterocytes but Has Inefficient Dissemination. Infect Immun. (2010) 78:3570–7. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01411-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Khare S, Lawhon SD, Drake KL, Nunes JES, Figueiredo JF, Rossetti CA, et al. Systems Biology Analysis of Gene Expression during In Vivo Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis Enteric Colonization Reveals Role for Immune Tolerance. PloS One. (2012) 7:e42127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. González J, Geijo MV, García-Pariente C, Verna A, Corpa JM, Reyes LE, et al. Histopathological classification of lesions associated with natural paratuberculosis infection in cattle. J Comp Pathol. (2005) 133:184–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2005.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sweeney RW. Pathogenesis of paratuberculosis. Vet Clinics North America: Food Anim Pract. (2011) 27:537–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.07.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Juste RA, Elguezabal N, Pavón A, Garrido JM, Geijo M, Sevilla I, et al. Association between Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA in blood and cellular and humoral immune response in inflammatory bowel disease patients and controls. Int J Infect Dis. (2009) 13:247–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.06.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Paccagnini D, Sieswerda L, Rosu V, Masala S, Pacifico A, Gazouli M, et al. Linking chronic infection and autoimmune diseases: Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, SLC11A1 polymorphisms and type-1 diabetes mellitus. PloS One. (2009) 4:e7109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Schultze JL, Rosenstiel P. Systems medicine in chronic inflammatory diseases. Immunity. (2018) 48:608–13. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Sechi LA, Dow CT. Mycobacterium avium ss. paratuberculosis Zoonosis - The Hundred Year War - Beyond Crohn’s Disease. Front Immunol. (2015) 6:96. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Alonso-Hearn M, Canive M, Blanco-Vazquez C, Torremocha R, Balseiro A, Amado J, et al. RNA-Seq analysis of ileocecal valve and peripheral blood from Holstein cattle infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis revealed dysregulation of the CXCL8/IL8 signaling pathway. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:14845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51328-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Canive M, Badia-Bringué G, Vázquez P, González-Recio O, Fernández A, Garrido JM, et al. Identification of loci associated with pathological outcomes in Holstein cattle infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis using whole-genome sequence data. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99672-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Badia-Bringué G, Canive M, Fernandez-Jimenez N, Lavín JL, Casais R, Blanco-Vázquez C, et al. Summary-data based Mendelian randomization identifies gene expression regulatory polymorphisms associated with bovine paratuberculosis by modulation of the nuclear factor Kappa β (NF-κß)-mediated inflammatory response. BMC Genomics. (2023) 24(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09710-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Canive M, Fernandez-Jimenez N, Casais R, Vázquez P, Lavín JL, Bilbao JR, et al. Identification of loci associated with susceptibility to bovine paratuberculosis and with the dysregulation of the MECOM, eEF1A2, and U1 spliceosomal RNA expression. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79619-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wang J, Zhang J, Li K, Zhao W, Cui Q. SpliceDisease database: Linking RNA splicing and disease. Nucleic Acids Res. (2012) 40(Database issue):D1055–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chabot B, Shkreta L. Defective control of pre-messenger RNA splicing in human disease. J Cell Biol. (2016) 212:13–27. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201510032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lee Y, Rio DC. Mechanisms and regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. (2015) 84:291–323. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034316

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wahl MC, Will CL, Lührmann R. The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell. (2009) 136:701–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Dvinge H, Kim E, Abdel-Wahab O, Bradley RK. RNA splicing factors as oncoproteins and tumour suppressors. Nat Rev Cancer. (2016) 16:413–30. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.51

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Tabrez SS, Sharma RD, Jain V, Siddiqui AA, Mukhopadhyay A. Differential alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated decay of mRNA ensures dietary restriction-induced longevity. Nat Commun. (2017) 8:306. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00370-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rotival M, Quach H, Quintana-Murci L. Defining the genetic and evolutionary architecture of alternative splicing in response to infection. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:1671. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09689-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Wang GS, Cooper TA. Splicing in disease: disruption of the splicing code and the decoding machinery. Nat Rev Genet. (2007) 8:749–61. doi: 10.1038/nrg2164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Kalsotra A, Cooper TA. Functional consequences of developmentally regulated alternative splicing. Nat Rev Genet. (2011) 12:715–29. doi: 10.1038/nrg3052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Ren P, Lu L, Cai S, Chen J, Lin W, Han F. Alternative splicing: A new cause and potential therapeutic target in autoimmune disease. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:713540. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.713540

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Lord J, Baralle D. Splicing in the diagnosis of rare disease: advances and challenges. Front Genet. (2021) 12:689892. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.689892

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Kalam H, Fontana MF, Kumar D. Alternate splicing of transcripts shape macrophage response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. PloS Pathog. (2017) 13:e1006236. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Mvubu NE, Pillay B, Pillay M. Infection of pulmonary epithelial cells by clinical strains of M. tuberculosis induces alternate splicing events. Gene. (2020) 750:144755. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144755

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Asselstine V, Medrano JF, Cánovas A. Identification of novel alternative splicing associated with mastitis disease in Holstein dairy cows using large gap read mapping. BMC Genomics. (2022) 23:222. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08430-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Wang XG, Ju ZH, Hou MH, Jiang Q, Yang CH, Zhang Y, et al. Deciphering transcriptome and complex alternative splicing transcripts in mammary gland tissues from cows naturally infected with Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. PloS One. (2016) 11:e0159719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159719

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Li H, Huang J, Zhang J, Gao Y, Han B, Sun D. Identification of alternative splicing events associated with paratuberculosis in dairy cattle using multi-tissue RNA sequencing data. Genes (Basel). (2022) 13:497. doi: 10.3390/genes13030497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Blanco-Vázquez C, Alonso-Hearn M, Juste RA, Canive M, Iglesias T, Iglesias N, et al. Detection of latent forms of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection using host biomarker-based ELISAs greatly improves paratuberculosis diagnostic sensitivity. PloS One. (2020) 15:e0236336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. (2013) 29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. (2019) 47:e47–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. (2014) 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Society: Ser B (Methodological). (1995) 57:289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Shen S, Park JW, Lu ZX, Lin L, Henry MD, Wu YN, et al. rMATS: Robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2014) 111:E5593–601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419161111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation. (2021) 2:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F, Hachilif R, et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. (2023) 51:D638–46. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Grant GR, Farkas MH, Pizarro AD, Lahens NF, Schug J, Brunk BP, et al. Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM). Bioinformatics. (2011) 27:2518–28. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr427

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Liao KC, Garcia-Blanco MA. Role of alternative splicing in regulating host response to viral infection. Cells. (2021) 10:1720. doi: 10.3390/cells10071720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Chacko E, Ranganathan S. Genome-wide analysis of alternative splicing in cow: implications in bovine as a model for human diseases. BMC Genomics. (2009) 10:S11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S3-S11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Ning S, Pagano JS, Barber GN. IRF7: activation, regulation, modification and function. Genes Immun. (2011) 12:399–414. doi: 10.1038/gene.2011.21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Häcker H, Tseng PH, Karin M. Expanding TRAF function: TRAF3 as a tri-faced immune regulator. Nat Rev Immunol. (2011) 11:457–68. doi: 10.1038/nri2998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Bo M, Jasemi S, Uras G, Erre GL, Passiu G, Sechi LA. Role of infections in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: Focus on mycobacteria. Microorganisms. (2020) 8:1–19. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101459

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kissler S, Stern P, Takahashi K, Hunter K, Peterson LB, Wicker LS. In vivo RNA interference demonstrates a role for Nramp1 in modifying susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet. (2006) 38:479–83. doi: 10.1038/ng1766

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Futosi K, Fodor S, Mócsai A. Neutrophil cell surface receptors and their intracellular signal transduction pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. (2013) 17:638–50. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2013.06.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Yang CT, Cambier CJ, Davis JM, Hall CJ, Crosier PS, Ramakrishnan L. Neutrophils exert protection in the early tuberculous granuloma by oxidative killing of mycobacteria phagocytosed from infected macrophages. Cell Host Microbe. (2012) 12:301–12. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.07.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Azcutia V, Parkos CA, Brazil JC. Role of negative regulation of immune signaling pathways in neutrophil function. J Leukoc Biol. (2018) 103:1029–41. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MIR0917-374R

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Sellau J, Groneberg M, Hoenow S, Lotter H. The underlying cellular immune pathology of Entamoeba histolytica-induced hepatic amoebiasis. J Hepatol. (2021) 75:481–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.03.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Uribe-Querol E, Rosales C. Immune response to the enteric parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Physiol (Bethesda). (2020) 35:244–60. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00038.2019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Yang Y, Huang JM, Ju ZH, Li QL, Zhou L, Li RL, et al. Increased expression of a novel splice variant of the complement component 4 (C4A) gene in mastitis-infected dairy cattle. Genet Mol Res. (2012) 11:2909–16. doi: 10.4238/2012.May.18.12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Andersson L, Lunden A, Sigurdardottir S, Davies CJ, Rask L. Linkage relationships in the bovine MHC region. High recombination frequency between class II subregions. Immunogenetics. (1988) 27:273–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00376122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Rupp R, Boichard D. Genetics of resistance to mastitis in dairy cattle. Vet Res. (2003) 34:671–88. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2003020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: paratuberculosis, alternative splicing, chronic inflammatory diseases, autoimmune diseases, molecular mechanisms

Citation: Badia-Bringué G, Lavín JL, Casais R and Alonso-Hearn M (2024) Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA modulates the immune response in Holstein cattle naturally infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Front. Immunol. 15:1354500. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1354500

Received: 12 December 2023; Accepted: 09 February 2024;
Published: 01 March 2024.

Edited by:

Han Sang Yoo, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea

Reviewed by:

Aruna Pal, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India
Emmanuel Atangana Maze, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire del’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (ANSES), France
Liliana Oliveira, Universidade do Porto, Portugal

Copyright © 2024 Badia-Bringué, Lavín, Casais and Alonso-Hearn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Marta Alonso-Hearn, malonso@neiker.eus

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.