Min Song Jeong
Yun Young Choi
Yo Han Ahn
Kyeonghun Lee
Ji Soo Park
Dong In Suh- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a life-threatening mucocutaneous disorder commonly caused by drugs. TEN is often treated with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or cyclosporine; however, the efficacy of these treatments is controversial. Etanercept (a TNF-α antagonist) was proven to decrease skin-healing time in a randomized clinical trial. Herein, we report the case of a 44-month-old boy who developed TEN due to deflazacort as the probable culprit drug and was successfully treated with etanercept. The patient presented to the emergency department complaining of erythematous maculopapular rashes and vesicles all over the face and body, with vesicles on the hands, feet, and trunk. Symptoms started 4 days before presentation, with edema of the upper lip, which progressed to erythematous macules over the body. He was started on deflazacort for nephrotic syndrome 21 days before the visit. Approximately 20% of the body surface area (BSA) was covered by vesicular lesions. Under the diagnosis of Steven Johnson syndrome/TEN, deflazacort was discontinued, and intravenous dexamethasone (1.5 mg/kg/day), a 5-day course of IVIG (0.4 mg/kg/day), and cyclosporine (3 mg/kg/day) were administered. The lesions seemed to be stationary for 3 days, but on the 6th day of hospitalization, when IVIG was discontinued, the vesicular lesions progressed to approximately 60% of the BSA. Etanercept 0.8 mg/kg was administered subcutaneously. Lesions stopped progressing, and bullous lesions started epithelialization. However, on the 15th day, around 30% of the BSA was still involved; thus, a second dose of etanercept was administered. No acute or sub-acute complications were observed. In conclusion, the use of etanercept in children with TEN that is not controlled with conventional therapy is both effective and safe.
1 Introduction
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a life-threatening mucocutaneous disorder often induced by drugs (1). Patients with TEN exhibit over 30% body surface area (BSA) for epidermal detachment, while those with Steven Johnson syndrome (SJS) have less than 10% BSA for skin detachment. Approximately 10%–30% of skin detachments are classified as overlapping SJS-TEN. Flu-like symptoms, such as fever, malaise, poor oral intake, sore throat, and headache, precede the onset of mucocutaneous symptoms, which are atypical targetoid maculopapules that form blisters (2).
TEN is mostly caused by drugs, such as sulfonamide or beta-lactam antibiotics, anti-seizure medications (phenytoin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine), allopurinol, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (3, 4). Other causes include Mycoplasma pneumoniae, dengue virus, cytomegalovirus, and the use of contrast agents (2). The probability of the culprit drug is assessed through algorithm of drug causality for epidermal necrolysis (ALDEN), which is based on six parameters: 1) the time interval between the start of the drug and the onset of the reaction (index day), 2) the likelihood that the drug was present on the index day, 3) the presence of a history of adverse effects with the same drug, 4) whether the drug was discontinued as the disease progressed, 5) whether the drug has been documented in previous studies (3, 4), and 6) consideration of alternative possibilities (5).
TEN treatment involves systemic steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or cyclosporine; however, the efficacy of these treatments is controversial (6). Recent studies showed elevated TNF-α levels in patients with SJS-TEN (7), and etanercept, a TNF-α antagonist, reduced skin-healing time in a randomized clinical trial (8). Herein, we report a case of a 44-month-old boy who developed TEN due to deflazacort as the probable culprit drug and was successfully treated with etanercept.
2 Case description
A 44-month-old boy presented to the emergency department with a fever of up to 38.4°C, sore throat, and erythematous maculopapular rashes and vesicles all over the face and body, with vesicles on the hands, feet, and trunk. The rashes and vesicles made the patient complain of severe pain and itching sensation. Symptoms began 4 days prior to presentation, with edema of the upper lip and vesicles in both hands. He was diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome and was taking deflazacort for nephrotic syndrome 21 days prior to the visit. Other complaints included diarrhea and dysuria. Physical examination showed that his eyes were also involved, with swelling of the eyelids, conjunctival injection, and yellowish mucous discharge. Erythematous maculopapular rashes appeared on the cheeks, neck, trunk, arms, penis, and fluid vesicles on both hands and feet. The patient also had a crust on his lips.
Laboratory tests showed a white blood cell count of 12,260 cells/mm3 (eosinophil count of 800 cells/mm3), hemoglobin level of 15.4 g/dL, and platelet count of 375,000 cells/mm3. Serum biochemistry showed blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level of 10 IU/L, creatinine level of 0.48 mg/dL, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level of 12/27 IU/L, C-reactive protein level of 1.83 mg/dL, and procalcitonin level of 0.206 ng/mL. Blood and urine cultures were negative for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, and human herpes virus antigen.
Under the diagnosis of SJS/TEN involving 20% of BSA with severity-of-illness score for TEN (SCORTEN) (6) of 1 (tachycardia, heart rate 162), deflazacort was discontinued, and dexamethasone (1.5 mg/kg/day), a 5-day course of IVIG (0.4 mg/kg/day), and cyclosporine 3 mg/kg/day were initiated. The lesions appeared to be stationary for 3 days; however, when IVIG was discontinued on the 6th day of hospitalization, the vesicular lesions progressed to approximately 60% of BSA (Figures 1A–C). Etanercept (0.8 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously (Figure 2). After administration, the lesion did not progress, and the bullous lesion also began to epithelialize. However, when re-evaluated on day 15, approximately 30% of the BSA was still involved (Figures 1D–F); therefore, a second dose of 0.8 mg/kg of etanercept was administered. Since then, the patient’s condition improved without any complications (Figure 1G–I).
Figure 1 Toxic epidermal necrolysis. (A–C). HD#7: Prior to the first etanercept injection, the patient had maculopapular rashes and vesicles throughout the body. (D–F). HD#11: After the first dose of etanercept, epithelization began, but some vesicles and bullae remained. (G–I). HD#18: After the second dose of etanercept, the patient’s skin was mostly epithelialized. HD, hospital day.
Figure 2 Skin detachment extent according to time. Extent of skin detachment due to toxic epidermal necrolysis during admission. Etanercept (0.8 mg/kg) was injected on hospital day #7 and hospital day #14. BSA, body surface area; HD, hospital day.
3 Discussion
TEN is a severe, potentially fatal mucocutaneous disorder (1). Despite the life-threatening nature of TEN, there are currently no standard treatment guidelines for TEN. The mainstay of treatment for TEN involves discontinuation of the culprit drug and provision of supportive care. The efficacy of commonly used systemic therapies, such as systemic steroid therapy, IVIG, and cyclosporine, has not been proven in large randomized trials and has yielded controversial results in smaller studies (6).
Deflazacort, a derivative of prednisolone oxazoline, is commonly used to treat nephrotic syndrome and is associated with low rates of steroid-induced osteoporosis and growth retardation (9). Although steroids are not commonly associated with the risk of SJS/TEN, in our case, deflazacort was the “probable” causative drug according to the ALDEN criteria. While notoriety of deflazacort is not “high risk”, the delay from initial drug intake to index day was “suggestive”, drug was present in the patient at index day, patient had not been exposed to this drug in the past and he had not been introduced to another culprit drug prior to the event (3–5). There have been some prior reports of SJS/TEN caused by deflazacort in literature (9–11). Steroids are classified into four classes based on their cross-reactivity. Deflazacort and corticosteroids are both in class A for cross-reactivity. Therefore, we used dexamethasone, which is in class C (12). Dexamethasone has been used in several cases to treat steroid-induced TEN (11, 13, 14).
While the complete pathogenesis of TEN remains elusive, TEN is understood as a T cell-mediated disease with CD8+ cells causing keratinocyte death with the contribution of granulysin, soluble Fas ligand, and TNF-α (2, 8). Systemic treatments, such as steroids, IVIG, and cyclosporine, inhibit these cytokines; however, their efficacy remains unclear (6, 15, 16). Etanercept is a monoclonal antibody that functions as a TNF-α antagonist by fusing to the extracellular binding domain of the human TNF receptor 2 (7, 17). In preclinical studies, etanercept showed significant immunosuppressive effects by reducing granulysin and TNF-α secretion in blister cells of patients with CTL-mediated severe cutaneous adverse reactions. In a randomized controlled trial comparing etanercept with steroids, etanercept was more effective than systemic corticosteroids in promoting reepithelialization in patients with TEN (8).
However, the use of etanercept in the pediatric population is limited (Table 1). In the previously mentioned randomized controlled study (8), the study population was mostly adults with a mean age of 56 years. Six pediatric patients were included in the study, only one of whom was treated with etanercept. Few case reports have described the use of etanercept in pediatric patients with TEN. The predominant causative drug is sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, a sulfonamide antibiotic. Treatment protocols varied, with some cases managed solely with etanercept while others concurrently treated with conventional systemic treatments, such as corticosteroids, IVIG, and cyclosporine. In most cases, the etanercept dosage was chosen using a small value of either 0.8 mg/kg/dose or 50 mg. The dosing interval varied from daily to once every 3 days. Physicians are prudent when using etanercept in pediatric patients with TEN due to its off-label application (24).
Table 1 Pediatric cases of SJS/TEN treated with etanercept in the literature.
In this case, the patient experienced an increase in skin detachment despite conventional systemic treatment. After the administration of etanercept on the 7th day of hospitalization, skin healing commenced, leading to a reduction in the degree of detachment. The patient recovered without complications and was discharged.
This study has limitations in that we have diagnosed TEN due to deflazacort as the probable culprit drug and did not perform skin biopsy to pathologically confirm TEN and in vivo or in vitro test to confirm the culprit drug. Furthermore, the use of etanercept was not initiated from the onset but rather after other treatments, making it challenging to attribute the observed effects solely to etanercept. Nevertheless, the noticeable improvement in skin lesions following etanercept administration suggests a potentially positive effect of etanercept.
As cases involving the administration of etanercept in pediatric patients are relatively scarce, this study is significant in that etanercept was safely used in children with TEN and led to improvement. Considering the limited number of pediatric patients, this study underscores the importance of further research, including randomized clinical trials, to assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept in the pediatric population.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board. (No. 2210-077-1368) Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the patient’s parents. Written informed consent was obtained from the minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
MJ: Writing – original draft, Investigation. YC: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YA: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. KL: Writing – review & editing. JP: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft. DS: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the patient and family for allowing us to share this experience with the medical community.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
TEN, toxic epidermal necrolysis; BSA, body surface area; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; ALDEN, algorithm of drug causality for epidermal necrolysis; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin.
References
1. Duong TA, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Wolkenstein P, Chosidow O. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs. Lancet (2017) 390(10106):1996–2011. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30378-6
2. Schwartz RA, McDonough PH, Lee BW. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: Part I. Introduction, history, classification, clinical features, systemic manifestations, etiology, and immunopathogenesis. J Am Acad Dermatol (2013) 69(2):173.e1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.003
3. Roujeau J-C, Kelly JP, Naldi L, Rzany B, Stern RS, Anderson T, et al. Medication use and the risk of stevens–johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. New Engl J Med (1995) 333(24):1600–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512143332404
4. Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, Naldi L, Halevy S, Bouwes Bavinck JN, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Invest Dermatol (2008) 128(1):35–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701033
5. Sassolas B, Haddad C, Mockenhaupt M, Dunant A, Liss Y, Bork K, et al. ALDEN, an algorithm for assessment of drug causality in stevens–johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: comparison with case–control analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther (2010) 88(1):60–8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.252
6. Schwartz RA, McDonough PH, Lee BW. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: Part II. Prognosis, sequelae, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol (2013) 69(2):187.e1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.002
7. Posadas SJ, Padial A, Torres MJ, Mayorga C, Leyva L, Sanchez E, et al. Delayed reactions to drugs show levels of perforin, granzyme B, and Fas-L to be related to disease severity. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2002) 109(1):155–61. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.120563
8. Wang CW, Yang LY, Chen CB, Ho HC, Hung SI, Yang CH, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of TNF-α antagonist in CTL-mediated severe cutaneous adverse reactions. J Clin Invest (2018) 128(3):985–96. doi: 10.1172/JCI93349
9. Jat KR, Khairwa A. Deflazacort in comparison to other steroids for nephrotic syndrome. Indian J Nephrol (2012) 22(4):239–45. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.101238
10. Lee EC, Kim GA, Koo JW. Toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with deflazacort therapy with nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Res Clin Pract (2014) 33(4):222–5. doi: 10.1016/j.krcp.2014.08.002
11. Youn D, Kim M-H, Koh SW, Kim JW, Yoon SE, Jeon HK, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by deflazacort. Allergy Asthma Respir Dis (2016) 4(3):221–4. doi: 10.4168/aard.2016.4.3.221
12. Browne F, Wilkinson SM. Effective prescribing in steroid allergy: controversies and cross-reactions. Clin Dermatol (2011) 29(3):287–94. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.11.007
13. Lauerma AI, Reitamo S, Maibach HI. Systemic hydrocortisone/cortisol induces allergic skin reactions in presensitized subjects. J Am Acad Dermatol (1991) 24(2 Pt 1):182–5. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70024-V
14. Koh WL, Tay YK, Koh MJ. Danazol-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Dermatol Online J (2015) 21(1). doi: 10.5070/D3211025452
15. Jacobsen A, Olabi B, Langley A, Beecker J, Mutter E, Shelley A, et al. Systemic interventions for treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2022) 3(3):Cd013130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013130.pub2
16. Schneck J, Fagot J-P, Sekula P, Sassolas B, Roujeau JC, Mockenhaupt M. Effects of treatments on the mortality of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: A retrospective study on patients included in the prospective EuroSCAR Study. J Am Acad Dermatol (2008) 58(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.039
17. Paquet P, Paquet F, Al Saleh W, Reper P, Vanderkelen A, Piérard GE. Immunoregulatory effector cells in drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis. Am J Dermatopathol (2000) 22(5):413–7. doi: 10.1097/00000372-200010000-00005
18. Sibbald C, Putterman E, Micheletti R, Treat J, Castelo-Soccio L. Retrospective review of drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis cases at a pediatric tertiary care institution. Pediatr Dermatol (2020) 37(3):461–6. doi: 10.1111/pde.14118
19. Gavigan GM, Kanigsberg ND, Ramien ML. Pediatric stevens-johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis halted by etanercept. J Cutan Med Surg (2018) 22(5):514–5. doi: 10.1177/1203475418758989
20. Coulombe J, Belzile E, Duhamel A, Rault P, Buteau C, DeBruycker JJ, et al. Pediatric SJS/TEN subdued by a combination of dexamethasone, cyclosporine, and etanercept. J Cutan Med Surg (2019) 23(5):547–50. doi: 10.1177/1203475419861078
21. Eliades P, Fonseca M, Harp J. Use of etanercept in a series of pediatric patients with stevens-johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis spectrum disease. JAMA Dermatol (2020) 156(8):921–2. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.3731
22. Zander E, Hintze TD, Sallee B, Allen P, Miller JL, Sagdeo M. Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis with etanercept in a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther (2021) 26(7):758–61. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.7.758
23. Tian CC, Ai XC, Ma JC, Hu FQ, Liu XT, Luo YJ, et al. Etanercept treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol (2022) 129(3):360–365.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.05.009
Keywords: toxic epidermal necrolysis, Steven Johnson syndrome, etanercept, deflazacort, severe cutaneous adverse reaction, pediatric
Citation: Jeong MS, Choi YY, Ahn YH, Lee K, Park JS and Suh DI (2024) Etanercept treatment for pediatric toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by deflazacort: a case report and literature review. Front. Immunol. 15:1342898. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1342898
Received: 22 November 2023; Accepted: 08 January 2024;
Published: 25 January 2024.
Edited by:
Mattia Bellan, University of Eastern Piedmont, ItalyReviewed by:
Yashwant Kumar, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), IndiaTomoya Watanabe, Yokohama City University, Japan
Raghwendra Mishra, Ananda Mohan College, India
Copyright © 2024 Jeong, Choi, Ahn, Lee, Park and Suh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ji Soo Park, jisoopark11@gmail.com